Masthead: Home Link

Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of perform.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USASpending.gov Last Updated
August 25, 2008

Contracts data was updated for all 24 CFO Act agencies at this time.

Assistance data was updated for 15 of 24 CFO act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies: DOD, DOT, DHS, GSA, HHS, NRC, OPM, SBA and TREAS.

For more details, please click here


Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in Massachusetts 8 (Michael E. Capuano)
(FY 2008)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2008 3Q * Partial year help link
Total dollars: $1,202,494,892
The amount for this search is 0.5% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This Congressional District is ranked 57 among districts for this year.
Total number of contractors: 364
Total number of transactions: 4,001
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$129,747,422
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was recieved$82,441,859
Competition within a limited pool$27,041,173
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$4,444,617
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$4,967,689
Not competed for an allowable reason$938,828,310
Not identified, soon to be addressed$15,023,821

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

Massachusetts 7 (Edward J. Markey)$569,363,750
Massachusetts 8 (Michael E. Capuano)$508,816,655
Massachusetts (unknown districts)$32,626,713
District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$13,249,253
Massachusetts 9 (Stephen F. Lynch)$10,457,921

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

Defense Electronics and Communication Equipment -- Basic Research (R&D)$569,623,933
Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Guided Missiles$305,427,381
Space Science and Applications -- Basic Research (R&D)$34,919,333
Other Research and Development -- Basic Research (R&D)$20,304,253
Other Defense -- Applied Research and Exploratory Development (R&D)$19,620,574

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$602,038,952
NAVY, Department of the$338,139,333
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION$47,973,963
National Institutes of Health$33,712,252
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$22,031,289

Top 10 Contractors

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$595,721,164
THE CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY INC$323,113,889
BBN TECHNOLOGIES CORP$22,742,523
ABT ASSOCIATES INC$20,765,725
BBNT SOLUTIONS LLC$16,253,133
PARTNERS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC$13,901,136
STATE STREET CORPORATION$12,846,599
CAMP DRESSER & MC KEE INC$11,285,931
ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.$11,164,706
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY$10,746,465

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$0
2001$0
2002$0
2003$0
2004$1,342,986,716
2005$1,423,967,130
2006$1,253,814,246
2007$1,754,143,782
2008 3Q * Partial year help link$1,202,494,892
*Note: FY 2008 only includes data up to second and part of third quarter.


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on September 22, 2008.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.