Masthead: Home Link

Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of perform.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USASpending.gov Last Updated
August 25, 2008

Contracts data was updated for all 24 CFO Act agencies at this time.

Assistance data was updated for 15 of 24 CFO act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies: DOD, DOT, DHS, GSA, HHS, NRC, OPM, SBA and TREAS.

For more details, please click here


Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in Florida 4 (Ander Crenshaw)
(FY 2007)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2007
Total dollars: $641,363,060
The amount for this search is 0.1% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This Congressional District is ranked 163 among districts for this year.
Total number of contractors: 438
Total number of transactions: 7,956
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$349,804,795
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was recieved$23,771,531
Competition within a limited pool$146,308,624
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$1,781,589
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$49,337,198
Not competed for an allowable reason$25,331,252
Not identified, soon to be addressed$45,028,072

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

Florida 4 (Ander Crenshaw)$231,808,052
Florida 11 (Jim Davis / Kathy Castor)$43,509,453
North Carolina 2 (Bob Etheridge)$34,853,950
Virginia 2 (Thelma D. Drake)$31,790,750
Maryland 5 (Steny H. Hoyer)$24,710,452

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

Construction of Structures and Facilities -- Miscellaneous Buildings$103,514,504
Non-nuclear Ship Repair (East) Ship repair (including overhauls and conversions) performed on non-nuclear propelled and nonpropelled ships east of the 108th meridian$87,101,627
Operation of Government-Owned Facilities -- Other Non-Building Facilities$48,518,208
Maintenance, Repair or Alteration of Real Property -- Other Airfield Structures$38,724,071
Maintenance, Repair or Alteration of Real Property -- Miscellaneous Buildings$31,840,267

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

NAVY, Department of the$301,364,826
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$154,680,913
Maritime Administration$49,790,774
VETERANS AFFAIRS, Department of$32,522,591
AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$28,190,651

Top 10 Contractors

SAUER HOLDINGS, INC.$230,617,921
CROWLEY MARITIME CORPORATION$49,022,353
ATLANTIC MARINE HOLDING CO$46,257,704
EARL INDUSTRIES, L.L.C.$34,987,247
L. C. GASKINS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.$26,016,896
CDI CORP.$21,634,974
WARDEN CONSTRUCTION CORP$15,494,386
QC MANAGEMENT, INC.$15,236,211
LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC.$14,667,349
SARVIS ASSOCIATES, INC$14,537,887

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$0
2001$0
2002$0
2003$0
2004$382,026,409
2005$462,765,698
2006$561,027,630
2007$641,363,060
2008 3Q * Partial year help link$239,226,648
*Note: FY 2008 only includes data up to second and part of third quarter.


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on September 21, 2008.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.