 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in South Carolina: 2000
Excel | CSV
| Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
156 |
71 |
704 |
990 |
1,457 |
| Very good |
46 |
7 |
13 |
47 |
62 |
| Good |
80 |
40 |
195 |
117 |
61 |
| Fair |
18 |
23 |
380 |
517 |
602 |
| Mediocre |
11 |
0 |
66 |
189 |
337 |
| Poor |
1 |
1 |
50 |
120 |
395 |
| Not reported |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
29 |
10 |
2 |
5 |
4 |
| Good |
51 |
56 |
28 |
12 |
4 |
| Fair |
12 |
32 |
54 |
52 |
41 |
| Mediocre |
7 |
0 |
9 |
19 |
23 |
| Poor |
1 |
1 |
7 |
12 |
27 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness
using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition.
A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement
distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions,
tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
