 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in South Carolina: 2000
(Miles)
Excel | CSV
| Graphic Version
| Total |
671 |
1,463 |
3,658 |
8,143 |
| Very good |
239 |
96 |
292 |
536 |
| Good |
302 |
957 |
1,531 |
2,832 |
| Fair |
95 |
381 |
1,714 |
3,038 |
| Mediocre |
35 |
24 |
52 |
793 |
| Poor |
0 |
5 |
69 |
944 |
| Not reported |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
36 |
7 |
8 |
7 |
| Good |
45 |
65 |
42 |
35 |
| Fair |
14 |
26 |
47 |
37 |
| Mediocre |
5 |
2 |
1 |
10 |
| Poor |
0 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness
using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition.
A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement
distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions,
tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
