March 31, 1994

The Honorable Bob Goodlatte
U.S. House of Representatives
640 Crestar Plaza
10 Franklin Road, S.E.
Roanoke, Virginia 24011

Dear Congressman Goodlatte:

Thank you for your letter of February 25, concerning the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) requirements. Your constituent, Dr. William F. Ball, feels that his compliance with this standard is "entirely too burdensome, unnecessary and of little benefit given the trouble and expenditure it requires."

We believe the HCS is a common sense regulation. It applies only to hazardous chemicals which are known to be present in the workplace in such a manner that employees may be exposed under normal conditions of use or in a foreseeable emergency. In terms of the notebooks of information mentioned by Dr. Ball, it appears that he is referring to the requirement for material safety data sheet (MSDS). The standard requires that for each hazardous chemical in the workplace, the employer is required to maintain a copy of the MSDS.

The HCS exempts several product categories, some of which would be pertinent to a physician employer. These exemptions include: any consumer product where the individual employer can show that it is used for the purpose intended by the manufacturer, and that the duration and frequency of exposure is no greater than the range of exposures experienced by consumers; drugs which are in solid, final form for direct administration to the patient (i.e., tablets or pills); drugs which are packaged by the manufacturer for sale to consumers and which employees do not administer to patients (e.g., over-the-counter medicines); and medicines which are intended for personal consumption by employees. However, non-solid, hazardous drugs are covered by the standard, and the physician employer would need to maintain a copy of the MSDS for such drugs, and include these products in the workplace hazard communication program.

OSHA'S HCS provides workers exposed to hazardous chemicals with information as well as training about the identities and hazards of those chemicals, as well as protective measures. OSHA believes that when workers have such information, they are better able to take steps to protect themselves from experiencing adverse effects from exposure. In addition, providing such information to employers helps them to design better protective programs for exposed employees.

OSHA believes that significant benefits are associated with the implementation of the HCS in the workplace. Employers may use the information, for example, to select personal protective equipment, design engineering controls, and substitute less hazardous chemicals. These actions will improve protection of workers. In addition, the written information may be used to train workers to properly handle the chemical.

For further references we have enclosed copies of the booklet designed to assist employers in complying with the HCS, entitled "Chemical Hazardous Communication." We have also enclosed a copy of the current rule, which was updated in a February 9, 1994 Federal Register notice. The requirements of the HCS have been clarified, but not substantially changed, in this rulemaking notice.

We hope this information is helpful. If you have any further questions please contact us at (202) 219-8036.

Sincerely,



H. Berrien Zettler, Deputy Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs