ISSN: 1080-6059
Silvana R. Favoretto,*† Cecília C. de Mattos,‡ Nélio B. de
Morais,§ Maria Luíza Carrieri,* Benedito N. Rolim,§ Lucia M. Silva,§
Charles E. Rupprecht,‡ Edison L. Durigon,† and Carlos A. de Mattos‡
*Instituto Pasteur de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; †Universidade
de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; ‡Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; and §Secretaria
Estadual de Saúde do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil
Suggested citation for this article
Abstract
Rabies viruses circulating in Ceará, Brazil, were identified
by molecular analysis to be related to variants maintained by dogs, bats, and
other wildlife. Most of these viruses are associated with human rabies cases.
We document the emergence of a rabies virus variant responsible for an
independent epidemic cycle in the crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous).
After dog rabies control programs were implemented in Ceará State, Brazil, a the number of human cases decreased (1,2). Thereafter, the epidemiologic importance of rabies in wildlife became evident. From 1990 through 2005, a total of 173 cases of rabies were reported in Cerdocyon thous (crab-eating fox), 25 in Callithrix. j. jacchus (common marmoset) and 6 in Procyon cancrivorous (crab-eating raccoon). During this period, in 13 of 40 human cases reported in Ceará, wildlife was the source of infection (2).
In 1996, because of this new epidemiologic situation, public health authorities launched an educational program, and no human cases due to wildlife were recorded in 1999, despite 84 cases in wildlife registered that year (2). The objective of this study was to elucidate some of the epidemiologic events involved in rabies emergence among wildlife in Ceará.
We studied 22 samples, from dogs, cattle, wildlife, and humans in Ceará, obtained from 1997 to 2003 (Table). Samples were antigenically characterized by using a monoclonal antibody (MAb) panel against the viral nucleoprotein (3–5). Isolates were injected into the brains of suckling mice, and brain impressions were made for MAb typing (3,5). Characterization of the samples identified 4 antigenic variants. Antigenic variant-2 (AgV2), maintained by dogs, was found in all C. thous, P. crancrivourous, and human cases and in all dog isolates with the exception of brdg5360, which was positive with all the MAbs. Antigenic variant-3 (AgV3), epidemiologically associated with vampire bats, Desmodus rotundus, was identified in 3 bovine samples. A previously reported profile, representing an AgV that circulates in marmosets in Ceará (5), was detected in sample brsg5696.
The Ceará viruses were analyzed genetically through a comparative phylogenetic study based on a 320-bp fragment of the nucleoprotein gene, from position 1157 to 1476, as compared with SADB19 (5–8). These isolates were also compared with rabies virus variants circulating among domestic animals and wildlife from the Americas. The viral RNA was extracted from infected tissues, and the cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription–PCR techniques, using primers 21 g and 304, and was sequenced with primer 304 (7,9). The phylogenetic analyses were made by using the PileUp program of the Wisconsin Package Version 10.1 (10) and the programs DNADIST, NEIGHBOR, SEQBOOT, and CONSENSE of the PHYLIP package (11). The expressed percentages of identity refer to the nucleotide sequences. The trees were obtained with the TREEVIEW program (12). The phylogenetic analyses showed segregation in 5 lineages, A–E (Figure 1), which was statistically supported by high bootstrap values.
Lineage A was represented by a sample from a dog from Maranguape, which was obtained in 2001. This virus showed its closest genetic relationship with lineage B (identity 92.4%–94.2%). Lineage B was formed by all the C. thous isolates, a sample from a human bitten by a P. cancrivorous raccoon in Fortaleza in 1997, and a virus from a P. crancrivorous raccoon collected in Maranguape during 2001 (intrinsic identity 96.5%–100%). This lineage showed its highest percentage of identity with lineage C (intrinsic identity 90.6%–92.8%). Lineage C consisted of 9 human samples collected in 5 different counties from 2000 to 2003 and an isolate obtained from a dog in 2000. The samples were highly homologous (intrinsic identity 99.1%–100%). Lineage D included 3 bovines collected in 3 geographically distant counties during 2000 and 2001 (intrinsic identity 97.5%–98.4%). Lineage E was represented by the only sample collected from a C. j jacchus marmoset, These last 2 lineages were related distantly to all the others.
When compared with representatives of rabies variants maintained by terrestrial and bat species in the Americas (Figure 2), lineages A, B, and C continue to segregate as independent lineages with high statistical support. Ceará bovine samples representing lineage D clustered with D. rotundus and D. rotundus–related cases from Latin America (intrinsic identity 94%–97.8%).
The only sample representative of lineage E segregated with 2 isolates from humans bitten by C. j. jacchus and a sample collected from a marmoset kept as a pet (5). The isolates were highly homologous to each other (intrinsic identity 98.7%–100%).
A thorough description of rabies epidemiology depends on a comprehensive surveillance program and application of accurate molecular methods to discriminate among different variants and the emergence of new foci. Antigenic and limited sequencing analyses were used to better understand the emergent epidemiologic events in wildlife in Ceará, Brazil. These analyses allowed identification of 5 potential cycles in this region, despite antigenic homogeneity.
Lack of antigenic and genetic relationships of sample brdg5693, representing lineage A, with the rest of the isolates from Ceará and the known terrestrial rabies vectors from the Americas shows that this virus is a variant not previously described. This virus was geographically and temporarily associated with samples brpcr5698 and brcth5692, obtained in Maranguape during 2001. These circumstances demonstrated the existence of at least 2 overlapping endemic cycles in this area. Lineage B was formed mainly by isolates from C. thous, which indicates the existence of an emerging rabies cycle in this species.
The epidemiologic situation in Ceará was complicated because of overlapping distributions of dog and C. thous rabies cases (Figure 1). Tree topology and genetic relationships between dog and C. thous variants suggested that the canine virus was introduced in C. thous populations because of spillover events, which gave rise to an emergent cycle. A similar event was described between domestic dogs and Canis adustus (jackal) in Zimbawe. In this case, the variant circulating in dogs was introduced into the C. adustus population by spillover events, with the consequent emergence of an independent cycle (13). Recently, the hoary fox has been identified as a rabies reservoir in Brazil (14).
Inclusion in lineage B of an isolate obtained from a human bitten by a P. cancrivorous raccoon and another sample collected from this species suggested the risk of establishing C. thous variant in P. cancrivorous. The niches of these 2 species overlap, which facilitates their encounters. Additional surveillance is necessary to clarify this situation.
Epidemiologic data which indicates that humans had been exposed to dog bites, results of molecular characterization, and inclusion of a dog isolate in the C lineage strongly incriminate the dog as the reservoir of this variant. Identification of the source of infection by using classic surveillance alone is complicated by the presence of multiple cycles of transmission. Genetic comparison of samples from lineage D with viruses representing bats viruses from the Americas helped to identify D. rotundus as the source of livestock infection.
The close genetic relationship of sample brsg5696 with rabies isolates obtained from C. j. jacchus and human cases bitten by marmosets further supported C. j. jaccuss as the most important vector of this variant. This finding indicates that this species plays an important role for disease maintenance in nature.
Methods for antigenic and genetic identification of rabies samples isolated in the Americas have contributed effectively to the development of health programs, as well as recognition of possible wild reservoirs of urban rabies. The emergence of new cycles in Latin American wildlife indicates the need to strengthen surveillance programs in these species and research development for the evaluation of the feasibility of oral vaccination interventions.
We thank Débora R. V. Sacramento for her technical collaboration, Fabiana L. A. da Silveira Lebrun for structural support, Maria das Graças Silva for help with the bibliography and illustrations, and all staff at Instituto Pasteur of São Paulo, Brazil, and Laboratory of Rabies Diagnosis of Ceará, Brazil, for collaboration and incalculable incentives.
Dr Favoretto is a scientific researcher and specialist in public health at the Instituto Pasteur of São Paulo. Her research interests include diagnosis and molecular epidemiology of rabies virus.
Figure 1. Rabies virus isolates by geographic localization
and neighbor-joining tree showing a comparison of the groups formed by Ceará
State, Brazil...
Figure 2. Neighbor-joining tree showing a comparison of
Ceará samples (groups A, B, C, D, E) with isolates obtained from the Americas...
Favoretto SR, de Mattos CC, de Morais NB, Carrieri ML, Rolim BN, Silva LM, et al. Rabies virus maintained by dogs in humans and terrestrial wildlife, Ceará State, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2006 Dec. [date cited]. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol12no12/06-0429.htm
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Silvana R. Favoretto, Instituto Pasteur of São Paulo, Brazil, Av: Paulista, 393, Paraíso, São Paulo, SP – Brazil, CEP: 01311000; email: srfavoretto@ig.com.br
Please note: To prevent email errors, please use no web addresses, email addresses, HTML code, or the characters <, >, and @ in the body of your message.
Please contact the EID Editors at eideditor@cdc.gov
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
This page posted November 8, 2006
This page last reviewed November 17, 2006
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, U.S.A
Tel: (404) 639-3311 / Public Inquiries: (404) 639-3534 / (800) 311-3435