Primary Navigation for the CDC Website
CDC en Español

Case Studies

Local Comprehensive Clean Indoor Air Ordinance in Texas


Lessons Learned

What were the important elements to the intervention's success?

A collaborative, unified approach throughout the campaign. The coalition’s motto could be described as "check your organizational turf and egos at the door" – everyone was working toward a common goal. There must be a unified approach to this type of campaign. It cannot be led by one agency, but rather it must be community-based and owned.

Sought training on policy and media advocacy for the coalition’s ordinance task force members. Received technical assistance and support from ANR, the CDC, the voluntary health agencies, and from other local coalitions with experience working on smoke-free ordinances (in particular, the Las Cruces NM coalition).

Built a diverse coalition, drawing from many sections of the community (e.g., health groups, law enforcement, educational groups, church groups, public agencies).

Youth component. The coalition recruited and developed youth leaders and empowered the youth coalition to set its own goals for the ordinance campaign. The youth were vital to the letter-writing campaign, held a rally the day of the council vote, and their testimony at the public hearing was extremely persuasive to city council members.

Found and cultivated a strong champion on the city council. Councilman Medina was passionate and enthusiastic in his support for the ordinance, stayed in close communication with the coalition about developments and strategy, and brooked no compromises.

Proactive efforts with the media. The coalition developed key speaking points and distributed them to committed activists. It provided the media with background information, facts, and statistics and monitored media coverage (responding immediately to any negative press). A letter-writing campaign to the local paper generated more than 7,000 letters to the editor (letters were cc:d to the City ).

Describe the policy and/or program interventions applicability/replicability to other sites, and include recommendations for other sites.

The El Paso campaign is an excellent example of a grassroots campaign. It relied on direct organizing to identify, recruit and mobilize supporters, and involved relatively little paid media or paid advocacy efforts. These broad lessons from this campaign are transferable to other communities. In addition, the El Paso Coalition serves as a model for developing a diverse, representative coalition in a predominantly Mexican American community.

The only caution to coalitions considering the El Paso experience is that the time frame to educate the community and organize grassroots support was considerably compressed, due to factors outside the Coalition’s control. Ideally, coalitions will have more time to educate the public and decision makers, and recruit and mobilize grassroots supporters.

Describe the challenges faced, and below each challenge, describe any solutions used to correct or reduce the problem.

Challenge: The ordinance was launched by health and environmental district well in advance of the coalition’s readiness to run a campaign. The coalition had planned to spend more than a year educating and organizing before formally introducing an ordinance before the city council. The campaign also was overtaken by city Council elections.

Solutions: Worked with the health and environmental district to slow down its process as much as possible. Was clear with people recruited to the ordinance task force that it was a serious time commitment. Met several times a week to adjust campaign activities based on recent events. Attended candidate forums to keep support for the ordinance visible.

Challenge: Business community saying "you have no right to regulate; you’re imposing on business and private property rights."

Solutions: Got hospitality workers involved to shift the focus back to the health issues. Rhetorical response to this is "The government already regulates business to protect public health, that’s why we have things like food handling and fire safety laws, this isn’t any different."

Challenge: Occasional inaccurate coverage in the press.

Solutions: Followed-up with reporter, provided the facts to set the record straight.

Challenge: Volunteers who were passionate, to the point of being aggressive and confrontational.

Solutions: Emphasized "facts not emotion" with volunteers. While passion is good, and personal stories compelling, The coalition trained volunteers how to stay on message and helped them see that being aggressive and confrontational harmed their cause. Developed a one-page fact sheet with speaking points to help volunteers focus and stay on track.

What would you have done differently?

Tried harder to recruit supportive restaurant and bar owners to talk to the media and city council members.

Lessons Learned Notes

Several key coalition member organizations could not directly lobby (i.e., urge council members to vote a particular way on a pending ordinance). This included public agency staff (e.g., local and state health departments), and the coalition coordinator, whose position was funded through the Paso del Norte Health Foundation grant to ACS. However, a tremendous amount of the organizing work to support the ordinance was educational, not direct lobbying. And the coalition included members who could, and did, lobby (e.g., the voluntary health agency staff, individual citizens, etc.). When seeking funding, consider carefully the potential restrictions on activity that may come with that funding. Make sure that some members of the coalition are not prevented from lobbying due to funding constraints.

Don’t have a "citizen’s committee" write the ordinance. This observation is based on the coalition’s experience with the 1994 attempt to strengthen the ordinance, when representatives from the local restaurant association were on the coalition and on the health and environmental district subcommittee that drafted the proposed revisions. Their presence significantly weakened the provisions.


 

Page last modified 07/25/2007