Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g3JIhBu19649; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:43:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:43:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <2E3AC3356942D511B8A30008C7AAAC08A6499A@wdcrobexc10.ed.gov> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Behroozi, Jaleh" <Jaleh.Behroozi@nifl.gov> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:101] assessment tool X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Status: O Content-Length: 802 Lines: 18 --------- > We have been working with a local manufacturing > company doing workplace education. Last summer we did a needs > assessment and now we are trying to build a tool for oral > assessment based on this. The tool is not a criteria for > advancement, but for class placement. I am trying to do a > good job, and build a fair test, although I feel like I'm > doing the devil's work. > > I would like to look at some other tools, but I don't > want to lose two weeks time waiting for "sample" material > that may or may not be good/applicable/useful. If you have > any suggestions that would be great. What good oral > assessments have you found? What was good about them? What > bad ones? What was bad about them (so I can avoid > incorporating the same mistakes). > Kevin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:46:24 EST