Use your browser's BACK button to return to your page of origin.

A cost-effectiveness evaluation of a jail-based Chlamydia screening program for men and its impact on their partners in the community.

Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2006; 33(10):S103-S110.

Gift TL, Lincoln T, Tuthill R, Whelan M, Briggs LP, Conklin T, Irwin KL.

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few cost-effectiveness evaluations of screening men in jails for chlamydia have been published, and none have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of providing partner notification services to the partners of chlamydia-infected inmates. GOAL: The goal of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the chlamydia screening and partner notification programs for men conducted by a Massachusetts jail compared with 3 hypothetical alternatives. STUDY DESIGN: Using jail cost and testing data, we used decision analyses to compare the cost and effectiveness of universal screening, age-based screening with 2 age cutoffs, and testing of symptomatic inmates at intake using treated cases of chlamydia and gonorrhea as the primary outcome. We also evaluated the cost-effectiveness of adding partner notification to these alternatives. RESULTS: Universal screening was the most effective and expensive alternative. Age-based screening would have identified slightly fewer cases at half the cost of universal screening. The net cost of partner notification was low. Assuming high sequelae costs in female partners made partner notification a cost-saving intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Age-based screening could lower costs without substantially sacrificing effectiveness. Notifying partners of infected inmates was a cost-effective adjunct to screening inmates.