Return-Path: <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5/980425bjb) with SMTP id WAA19904; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 22:14:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 22:14:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <19990909021430.28722.qmail@hotmail.com> Errors-To: lmann@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "ralph silva" <silva_ralph@hotmail.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:126] accountability balance X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Status: OR When we think about all the accountability scenarios presented in Juliet Merrifield's piece; is there a hierarchy of accountabilities? On page 10 she says, "Reforming accountability requires moving from one-way, top-down lines of accountability to a mutual web of accountability relationships...(changes) will require federal and state government departments to consult with the field and with stakeholders." How can these goals be implemented in a way that both honors the mission (of ABE) and satisfies funders and legislators? Does success depend on the type and size of your organization? Can Shirley Wright's success in Maine be duplicated in other programs? If not, why not, and if not, how do you decide what takes precedence? RS ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 21 2000 - 11:03:57 EDT