[NIFL-FOBASICS:24] Outcomes and Impacts

From: Barbara Garner (Barbara_Garner@jsi.com)
Date: Wed Mar 10 1999 - 08:31:36 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5/980425bjb) with SMTP id IAA12068; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 08:31:36 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 08:31:36 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <s6e62e56.000@jsi.com>
Errors-To: lmann@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Barbara Garner" <Barbara_Garner@jsi.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:24] Outcomes and Impacts
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2
Status: OR

Hal Beder's article, "Lessons from NCSALL's Outcomes and Impacts
Study," suggests that we have a long way to go in gathering
substantive information regarding learner's academic skill changes.
Much the same can be said for gathering information on the longer-term
impacts of adult basic education.

Thinking back, the program I worked with that had the most success
gathering "post program" information from students 1) built a strong
community within the classroom 2) from the outset explained that they
keep in touch with students to learn about jobs they get or additional
education they enroll in, and 3) had staff from the community who
sometimes made home visits or tapped into an extended network to
reconnect with former students.

What strategies or techniques have you used to follow up on students
that have worked?

Barb Garner

******************************

Barbara Garner                  phone (617) 482-9485
World Education                fax      (617) 482-0617
44 Farnsworth Street          e-mail bgarner@worlded.org
Boston, MA  02210-1211



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 21 2000 - 11:03:55 EDT