Data for Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Montana: 2000,,,,,,
(Miles),,,,,,
,Interstate ,Other Freeways & Expressways,Other Principal Arterial ,Urban Minor Arterial ,Urban Collector,
Total,57,0,172,25,0,
   Very good ,4,0,2,0,0,
   Good,27,0,32,13,0,
   Fair,12,0,77,12,0,
   Mediocre ,13,0,25,0,0,
   Poor,1,0,36,0,0,
(Percent),,,,,,
,Interstate ,Other Freeways & Expressways,Other Principal Arterial ,Urban Minor Arterial ,Urban Collector,
Total,57,0,172,25,0,
Very good ,7,0,1,0,0,
Good,47,0,19,52,0,
Fair,21,0,45,48,0,
Mediocre ,23,0,15,0,0,
Poor,2,0,21,0,0,
KEY FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: N = data do not exist; NA = not applicable.,,,,,,
"SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.",,,,,,
"NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE:  Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition.  A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.  ",,,,,,
,,,,,,