FR Doc E7-1469
[Federal Register: January 31, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 20)]
[Notices]
[Page 4534]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr31ja07-90]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-60,409]
Davis International, Okolona, MS; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application of January 2, 2007, a petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of
the subject firm to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
(ATAA).
The workers of Davis International, Okolona, Mississippi were
certified eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
denied to apply for ATAA on December 5, 2006. The denial notice will be
soon published in the Federal Register.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) if it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) if in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-
interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The group eligibility criteria for the ATAA program that the
Department must consider under Section 246 of the Trade Act are:
1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are
not easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
The initial ATAA investigation revealed that no workers at the
subject firm were 50 years of age or older during the relevant time
period and thus criterion (1) has not been met.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner stated that he
was part of the petitioning worker group and that he was also over the
age of 50 during the relevant time period.
A company official was contacted to confirm the age of all the
employees of the subject firm during the relevant time period. The
company official did acknowledge the fact that the worker who submitted
the request for reconsideration is over the age of 50 and that she made
a mistake omitting him from the petitioning worker group during the
initial investigation. The official further stated that this worker was
the only employee over the age of 50 or older at the subject firm
during the relevant time period.
When assessing eligibility for ATAA, the Department makes its
determinations based on the requirements as outlined in Section 222 of
the Trade Act. In particular, the Department considers the relevant
employment data for the facility where the petitioning worker group was
employed in order to establish whether criterion 1 has been met. For
this purpose, the term ``significant number'' means five percent of the
adversely affected workforce or 50 workers, whichever is less, or at
least three workers in a firm with less than 50 adversely affected
workers.
As the total number of workers 50 years of age or older was one
employee during the relevant period, criterion (1) of the eligibility
requirements for ATAA has not been met.
Conclusion
After review of the application and investigative findings, I
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed at Washington, DC this 17th day of January, 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-1469 Filed 1-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P