UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ELECTRIC
INC., WALTER T. SIGMONT,
RUTH A. SIGMONT, EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.,
WIRT EDMONDS, FRANCIS D.
EDMONDS, PNE CONSTRUCTION,
CAPSTONE INC., and
TEAL-WHITWORTH ARCHITECTS,
P.A.,
Defendants.
___________________________________
COMPLAINT
The United States of America alleges:
- This action is brought by the United States to enforce the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619.
Jurisdiction and Venue
- This court has jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1345 and 28 U.S.C. § 3614(a).
- Venue is proper in that the claims alleged herein arose
in the District of Idaho.
Subject Properties
- Jade Village No. 2, Grayling Place, Imperial Court,
Lawton Apartments, and Eagleson Park (hereinafter collectively
referred to as "the subject properties") are apartment complexes
located in Boise, Idaho, in the District of Idaho.
- Jade Village No. 2 is located at 6715, 6719, 6723,
6727, 6733, 6761, 6775, 6787, 6799, and 6841 West Overland Road,
Boise. It consists of six buildings containing a total of 40
apartments. Twenty of the apartments are located on the ground
floor.
- Imperial Court is located at 4824, 4850, 4876, 4900,
4908, and 4920 West Blodgett Road, Boise. It consists of six
buildings containing a total of 24 apartments. Twelve of the
apartments are located on the ground floor.
- Lawton Apartments is located at 3430, 3436, 3452, 3474,
and 3498 North Street, Boise. It consists of five buildings
containing a total of 20 apartments. Ten of the apartments are
located on the ground floor.
- Eagleson Park is located at 1706, 1710, 1714, 1716,
1718, and 1720 South Eagleson Road, Boise. It consists of six
buildings containing a total of 23 apartments. Ten of the
apartments are located on the ground floor.
- Grayling Place is located at 545, 550, 567, and 584
South Dalton Ave., 9058, 9072, 9086, 9100, and 9114 West Sigmont
Lane, 540, 553, 565 and 578 South Workland Lane, Boise. It
consists of 13 buildings containing a total of 52 apartments.
Twenty-six of the apartments are located on the ground floor.
- The subject properties were designed and constructed
for first occupancy after March 13, 1991. Each apartment at the
subject properties is a dwelling within the meaning of 42 U.S.C.
§ 3602(b).
- Each of the 72 ground-floor apartments at the subject
properties is a "covered multifamily dwelling" within the
meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(7)(A) and is subject to the
design and construction requirements at 42 U.S.C. §
3604(f)(3)(C).
Defendants
- Defendants Pacific Northwest Electric, Inc., Walter T.
Sigmont, Ruth A. Sigmont, and PNE Construction reside in and/or
have their principle place of business in Boise, in the District
of Idaho. They owned the subject properties during their
construction and were responsible for their design and
construction.
- Defendants Edmonds Construction Co., Inc., Wirt
Edmonds and Francis D. Edmonds reside in and/or have their
principle place of business in Boise, in the District of Idaho.
They owned Jade Village No. 2, Grayling Place and Lawton
Apartments during their construction and were responsible for
their design and construction.
- Defendant Capstone Inc. is an architectural firm with
its principle place of business in Payette in the District of
Idaho. Defendant Capstone Inc. designed Jade Village No. 2.
- Defendant Teal-Whitworth Architects, P.A., is an
architectural firm with its principle place of business in Boise
in the District of Idaho. Defendant Teal-Whitworth Architects,
P.A. designed Lawton Apartments.
Fair Housing Act Pattern or Practice Claim
- The defendants have failed to design and construct the subject properties so that:
- the public use and common use portions are readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities;
- all doors within the 72 ground floor units are
sufficiently wide to allow passage by persons with
disabilities who use wheelchairs; and
- the 72 ground floor units contain the following
features of adaptive design: (i) an accessible route into
and through the dwelling; (ii) electrical outlets,
thermostats and other environmental controls in accessible
locations; (iii) reinforcements in bathroom walls to allow
later installation of grab bars; and iv) usable kitchens
and bathrooms such that an individual using a wheelchair
can maneuver about the space.
- The defendants, through the actions referred to in the
preceding paragraph, have:
- Discriminated in the rental, or otherwise made unavailable or denied, dwellings to renters because of
handicap, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(1);
- Discriminated against persons in the terms,
conditions or privileges of rental of a dwelling, or in the
provision of services or facilities in connection with a
dwelling, because of handicap, in violation of 42 U.S.C. §
3604(f)(2); and
- Failed to design and construct dwellings in
compliance with the accessibility and adaptability features
mandated by 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(C).
- The conduct of the defendants described above
constitutes:
- A pattern or practice of resistance to the full enjoyment of rights granted by the Fair Housing Act, 42
U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619; and
- A denial to a group of persons of rights granted
by the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619, which
denial raises an issue of general public importance.
- Persons who may have been the victims of the
defendants' discriminatory housing practices are aggrieved
persons as defined by 42 U.S.C. § 3602(i) and may have suffered
injuries as a result of the defendants' conduct described above.
- The defendants' conduct described above was
intentional, willful, and taken in disregard for the rights of
others.
WHEREFORE, the United States prays that the court enter an
order that:
- Declares that the defendants' policies and practices,
as alleged herein, violate the Fair Housing Act;
- Enjoins the defendants, their officers, employees,
agents, successors and all other persons in active concert or
participation with any of them, from:
- Failing or refusing to bring the 72 ground floor
units and public use and common use areas at the subject
properties into compliance with 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(C),
including providing reasonable compensation to the owners
and tenants of the subject properties for inconvenience
caused by and other expenses related to such retrofitting;
- Failing or refusing to take such affirmative steps
as may be necessary to restore, as nearly as practicable,
the victims of the defendants' unlawful practices to the
position they would have been in but for the discriminatory
conduct; and
- Designing or constructing covered multifamily
dwellings in the future that do not contain the
accessibility and adaptability features required by 42
U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(C);
- Awards such damages as would fully compensate each
person aggrieved by the defendants' discriminatory housing
practices for his or her injuries resulting from the defendants'
discriminatory conduct, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3614(d)(1)(B);
- Awards punitive damages to each person aggrieved by the
defendants' discriminatory housing practices because of the
intentional and willful nature of the defendants' conduct,
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3614(d)(1)(B); and
- Assesses a civil penalty against each defendant in the
maximum amount authorized by 42 U.S.C. § 3614(d)(1)(C), in order
to vindicate the public interest.
The United States further prays for such additional relief
as the interests of justice may require.
|
JANET RENO Attorney General |
BETTY A. RICHARDSON United States Attorney |
BILL LANN LEE Assistant Attorney General |
|
JOAN A. MAGAGNA Chief, Housing and Civil Enforcement Section |
|
Timothy J. Moran Deputy Chief Kathleen M. Pennington Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division Housing and Civil Enforcement Section P.O. Box 65998 Washington, D.C. 20035-5998 (202) 353-9759 |