- Info
Contested Case Decisions
Department of Labor and Industrial Relation
|
|
|
Contested Case Decisions
06-001-H-D
Proposed
Decision
Final
Decision
Order Denying Executive Director's Motion for Reconsideration
|
Hoshijo/Del M. Scotto v. Janene Caracaus
(housing, disability)
a) Hearings Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended
Order (March 13, 2007)
b) Final Decision (June 22, 2007)
|
99-001-H-D
Proposed
Decision
Final
Decision
|
Hoshijo/Jerry and Manoa Ramos v. Beretania Hale and Mary Mau Le Cavelier
(housing, disability, resonable accommodation)
a) Hearings Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended
Order (December 13, 1999)
b) Final Decision (Febuary 28, 2000)
|
98-007-E-D
Recommended
Order
Order Sua
Sponte
Supplemental
Findings
2nd
Order Sua Sponte
2nd
Supplemental Findings
Final
Order
1st
Circuit Reversal
Notice
of Appeal
Unpublished Decision
|
Hoshijo/Pied v. Aloha IslandAir, Inc. (employment, disability)
a) Hearings Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended Order (May 28, 1999)
b) Order Sua Sponte Remanding Case For Further Proceedings
(June 3, 1999)
c) Hearings Examiner's Supplemental Findings of Fact, Conclusions
of Law and Recommended Order (November 29, 1999)
d) Order Sua Sponte Remanding Case For Further Proceedings
(March 10, 2000)
e) Hearings Examiner's Second Supplemental Findings of Fact, Conclusions
of Law and Recommended Order (August 21, 2000)
f) Final Decision and Order (November 22, 2000)
g) Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Reversing Final
Decision and Award [PDF file]
(First Circuit Court, State of Hawai'i, August 9, 2001)
h) Notice of Appeal to the Supreme Court (August 14, 2001)
i) Summary disposition order vacating and remanding case (unpublished decision, Aloha Islandair, Inc. vs. Hoshijo, 109 Hawai'i 457 (2006))
|
97-009-E-P
Proposed
Decision
Final
Decision
|
Hoshijo/Smith v. Taberu Management, Inc. dba RB Honolulu #1 (employment,
pregnancy)
a) Hearings Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended
Order (July 26, 1998)
b) Final Decision and Order (August 13, 1998)
|
97-001-PA-R
Proposed
Decision
Final
Decision
|
Hoshijo/White v. State of Hawai'i, University of Hawai'i and Rob Wallace
(public accommodations, race)
a) Hearings Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended
Order (February 2, 1998)
b) Final Decision and Order (May 19, 1998)
(affirmed, Civil No. 98-2810-06,
First Circuit Court, February 24, 1999); affirmed, Hawai'i Supreme
Court in State,
University of Hawaii v. Hoshijo, 102 Hawai'i 307 (2003)
|
96-008-E-NO-MS
Proposed
Decision
Final
Decision
|
Hoshijo/Hemaidan v. Life Support Systems Hawaii, Inc. (employment, pre-employment
inquiries)
a) Hearings Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended
Order (July 11, 1997)
b) Final Decision and Order (October 14, 1997)
|
95-012-E-SH
Proposed
Decision
Final Decision
|
Tseu/Gould v. Dr. Robert Simich, formerly dba Dr. Robert L. Simich and
Associates, also formerly dba Kailua Family and Urgent Medical Care; and
Dr. Harold Steinberg (employment, sexual harassment, same sex sexual harassment)
a) Hearings Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended
Order (June 20, 1996)
b) Final Decision and Order (October 29, 1996)
(affirmed, Civil No. 96-4865-11, First Circuit Court, September 19,
1997; affirmed, Hawai'i Supreme Court in Steinberg v. Hoshijo,
88 Haw. 10 (1998)
|
95-001-E-R-S
Proposed
Decision
Final
Decision
|
Tseu/Collins v. Cederquist, Inc.; Andres Corpuz; and Teresito Cabradilla
(employment, sexual harassment, retaliation)
a) Hearings Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended
Order (March 13, 1996)
b) Final Decision (June 28, 1996)
(affirmed, Civil No. 96-0614 (1) consolidated with Civil No. 96-0629
(1), Second Circuit Court, January 24, 1997)
|
95-002-E-A-D-RET
Proposed
Decision
Final
Decision
|
Tseu/Cole v. Treehouse Restaurant, Inc. (employment, age, disability,
retaliation, burdens of proof in circumstantial evidence cases)
a) Hearings Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended
Order (January 5, 1996)
b) Final Decision (May 2, 1996)
|
94-001-E-P
Proposed
Decision
Final
Decision
|
Tseu/Shaw v. Sam Teague, Ltd. et. al. (employment, pregnancy, pregnancy
harassment)
a) Hearings Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended
Order (November 18, 1994)
b) Final Decision (March 3, 1995)
(affirmed, Civil No. 95-1164-04, First Circuit Court, February 7,
1996); affirmed, Hawai'i Supreme Court in Teague v. HCRC, 89 Haw. 269,
(1999)
|
94-003-E-R
Proposed
Decision
Final
Decision
|
Tseu/Davis v. Volcano Island Farms, Inc. et. al. (employment, race harassment)
a) Hearings Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended
Order (November 2, 1994)
b) Final Decision (February 8, 1995)
(affirmed in part and modified in part, Civil No. 95-105 Third Circuit
Court, January 4, 1996)
|
94-002-E-D
Proposed
Decision
Final
Decision
|
Tseu/Aho v. Dept. of Parks and Recreation, City and County of Honolulu
(employment, disability)
a) Hearings Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended
Order (October 19, 1994)
b) Final Decision (December 20, 1994)
(affirmed, Civil No. 95-0178-01, First Circuit Court, December
14, 1995)
|
92-003-PA-R-S
Proposed
Decision
Final
Decision
|
In Re Smith/MTL, Inc. et. al. (public accommodations, race, sex)
a) Hearings Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended
Order (July 23, 1993)
b) Addendum to Hearings Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of
Law and Recommended Order (July 23, 1993)
c) Final Decision and Order (November 9, 199
|
91-001-E-SH
Proposed
Decision
Final
Decision
|
In Re Santos/Niimi - Hawaiian Flowers Exports, Inc. (employment, sexual
harassment)
a) Hearings Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended
Order (November 4, 1992)
b) Final Decision (January 25, 1993)
(affirmed, Civil No. 93-88, Third Circuit Court, August 31, 1994)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you can read this text, it means you are not experiencing the Plone design at its best.
Plone makes heavy use of CSS, which means it is accessible to any internet browser,
but the design needs a
standards-compliant browser to look like we intended it.
Just so you know ;)
|
|