[Federal Register: March 28, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 61)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 16562-16571]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28mr08-11]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, and 199
RIN 2137-AE29
[Docket No. PHMSA-2007-0033]
Pipeline Safety: Administrative Procedures, Address Updates, and
Technical Amendments
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Interim final rule and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This interim final rule conforms PHMSA's administrative
procedures with the Pipeline Inspection, Protection, Enforcement, and
Safety Act of 2006 (PIPES Act) by establishing the procedures PHMSA
will follow in issuing safety orders and handling requests for special
permits, including emergency special permits. This interim final rule
also notifies operators about electronic docket information
availability; updates
[[Page 16563]]
addresses, telephone numbers, and routing symbols; and clarifies the
time period for processing requests for written interpretations of the
regulations. This interim final rule does not impose any new operating,
maintenance, or other substantive requirements on pipeline owners or
operators.
DATES: Effective Date: This interim final rule is effective April 28,
2008. Comment date: Persons interested in submitting written comments
on this interim final rule must do so by April 28, 2008. PHMSA will
consider late filed comments so far as practicable.
ADDRESSES: Comments should reference Docket No. PHMSA-2007-0033 and may
be submitted in the following ways:
E-Gov Web Site: http://www.regulations.gov. This site
allows the public to enter comments on any Federal Register notice
issued by any agency.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: DOT Docket Operations Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: DOT Docket Operations Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Instructions: Identify the docket number, PHMSA-2007-0033, at the
beginning of your comments. If you mail your comments, we request that
you send two copies. To receive confirmation that PHMSA received your
comments, include a self-addressed stamped postcard. Note: All comments
are electronically posted without changes or edits, including any
personal information provided.
Privacy Act Statement
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received in
response to any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting
the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement was published in the Federal Register on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry White, PHMSA, Office of Chief
Counsel, 202-366-4400, or by e-mail at lawrence.white@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This interim final rule conforms PHMSA's administrative procedures
with the PIPES Act by outlining the procedures PHMSA will follow in
issuing safety orders under 49 U.S.C. 60117(l) and handling requests
for special permits, including emergency special permits under 49
U.S.C. 60118(c). This interim final rule also notifies operators about
electronic docket information availability; makes minor amendments
reflecting the recent relocation of DOT headquarters; updates several
Web site addresses, telephone numbers, and routing symbols; and
clarifies the time period for processing requests for written
interpretations of the regulations. This interim final rule does not
impose any new operating, maintenance or other substantive requirements
on pipeline operators. The following is a brief summary of each
amendment.
1. Safety Orders
Section 13 of the PIPES Act amended 49 U.S.C. 60117(l) to read as
follows:
``(1) In general.--Not later than December 31, 2007, the
Secretary shall issue regulations providing that, after notice and
opportunity for a hearing, if the Secretary determines that a
pipeline facility has a condition that poses a pipeline integrity
risk to public safety, property, or the environment, the Secretary
may order the operator of the facility to take necessary corrective
action, including physical inspection, testing, repair, or other
appropriate action, to remedy that condition.
(2) Considerations.--In making a determination under paragraph
(1), the Secretary, if relevant and pursuant to the regulations
issued under paragraph (1), shall consider--
(A) The considerations specified in paragraphs (1) through (6)
of section 60112(b);
(B) The likelihood that the condition will impair the
serviceability of a pipeline;
(C) The likelihood that the condition will worsen over time; and
(D) The likelihood that the condition is present or could
develop on other areas of the pipeline.''
The Secretary has delegated to PHMSA all necessary authority to
establish and enforce regulations under the pipeline safety laws,
including the PIPES Act (49 CFR 1.53). Pursuant to this delegation,
PHMSA is prepared to issue safety orders under the procedures and
standards prescribed in Section 13 of the PIPES Act and this interim
final rule. We will consider initiating safety order proceedings to
address identified pipeline integrity risks that may not rise to the
level of a hazardous condition requiring immediate corrective action
under 49 U.S.C. 60112, but should be addressed over time to protect
life, property, or the environment and prevent pipeline failures or
conditions that could disrupt energy supplies. In keeping with
legislative objectives, we intend to broadly consider all known
integrity risks on a given pipeline or pipeline segment, including
those related to external or environmental forces. Over time, changes
in external factors, such as climate, geology, and land use, may pose
direct threats to the integrity of a pipeline warranting additional
monitoring and special precautions.
The PIPES Act amended 49 U.S.C. 60117(l) by establishing statutory
standards for issuance of a safety order. A safety order must be based
on a finding by the Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety that a
pipeline facility has a condition that poses a pipeline integrity risk
to public safety, property, or the environment. In making the required
finding, the Associate Administrator will consider all relevant
information, including the nine considerations expressly enumerated in
Sec. 60117(l)(2) (and by cross-reference to Sec. 60112(b)):
The characteristics of the pipe and other equipment used
in the pipeline facility involved, including its age, manufacturer,
physical properties (including its resistance to corrosion and
deterioration), and the method of its manufacture, construction or
assembly;
The nature of the materials transported by such facility
(including their corrosive and deteriorative qualities), the sequence
in which such materials are transported, and the pressure required for
such transportation;
The characteristics of the geographical areas in which the
pipeline facility is located, in particular the climatic and geologic
conditions (including soil characteristics) associated with such areas;
For hazardous liquid pipelines, the proximity of the area
in which the pipeline facility is located to unusually sensitive areas;
The population density and population and growth patterns
of the area in which the pipeline facility is located;
Any recommendation of the National Transportation Safety
Board issued in connection with any investigation conducted by the
Board;
The likelihood that the condition will impair the
serviceability of the pipeline;
The likelihood that the condition will worsen over time;
and
The likelihood that the condition is present or could
develop on other areas of the pipeline.
[[Page 16564]]
The statute also gives PHMSA broad authority to prescribe
corrective action based on the nature of the identified risk condition.
As provided in section 60117(l)(2), we are authorized to ``order the
operator of the facility to take necessary corrective action, including
physical inspection, testing, repair, or other appropriate action, to
remedy th[e] condition.'' For purposes of this interim final rule, we
have identified specific measures that may be considered appropriate
for inclusion in a safety order. In addition to physical inspection,
testing, integrity assessment, and repair, PHMSA will consider ordering
an operator to establish procedures for continuous monitoring of
pipeline conditions; implement or strengthen its data integration
processes; and improve information management systems. Through such
measures, the operator would identify and incorporate findings from its
continuous evaluation of the pipeline's operations and performance.
PHMSA believes this approach is consistent with the language and
purpose of the PIPES Act and the clear legislative intent to address
problems before they present immediate hazards.
The amendment made by the PIPES Act also requires PHMSA to provide
operators with notice and an opportunity for a hearing before issuing a
safety order and directs PHMSA to issue applicable procedural
regulations. This interim final rule establishes the procedures PHMSA
will use to issue safety orders. In general, PHMSA will use its
longstanding procedures for administrative enforcement proceedings set
forth in 49 CFR part 190. In addition, PHMSA will provide operators
with an opportunity for informal consultation in advance of a hearing.
PHMSA believes the informal consultation process will benefit the
agency, operators, and the public by providing a more streamlined and
timely means of achieving safety improvements. The process is
summarized as follows: Notice of Proposed Safety Order. PHMSA will
initiate a safety order proceeding by serving written notice of a
proposed safety order in accordance with Sec. 190.5 upon the operator
of the identified facility. The notice will allege the existence of a
condition that poses a pipeline integrity risk to public safety,
property, or the environment, and state the facts and circumstances
that support issuing a safety order for the specified pipeline
facility. The notice will also propose testing, integrity assessment,
evaluations, repairs, or other corrective action to be taken by the
operator and may propose that the operator submit a work plan and
schedule to address the condition(s) identified in the notice. The
notice will describe the respondent operator's response options,
including procedures for requesting informal consultation and hearing.
An operator receiving a notice will have 30 days to respond.
Informal consultation. Upon timely request by the operator, PHMSA
will provide an opportunity for informal consultation concerning the
proposed safety order. Such informal consultation shall commence within
30 days, provided that PHMSA may extend this time by request or
otherwise for good cause. Informal consultation provides an opportunity
for the operator to explain the circumstances associated with the risk
condition(s) alleged in the notice and, as appropriate, to present a
proposal for remedial action, without prejudice to the operator's
position in any subsequent hearing. If the operator and PHMSA agree
within 30 days of informal consultation on a plan for the operator to
address each identified risk condition, they may enter into a written
consent agreement, and PHMSA will then issue an administrative consent
order incorporating the terms of the agreement. If a consent agreement
is reached, no further hearing will be provided in the matter and any
pending hearing request will be considered withdrawn. If a consent
agreement is not reached, any admissions made by the operator during
the informal consultation shall be excluded from the record in any
subsequent hearing.
Hearing and final action. An operator receiving a notice of
proposed safety order will be granted an administrative hearing upon
written request filed within 30 days following receipt of the notice or
within 10 days following the conclusion of informal consultation that
did not result in a consent agreement, as applicable. The hearing will
be conducted informally, without strict adherence to formal rules of
evidence before a Presiding Official who has had no significant prior
involvement in the case. The respondent may submit any relevant
information or materials, call witnesses, and present arguments
addressing the proposed safety order. After conclusion of a hearing
under this section, based on the record and the recommendation of the
Presiding Official, if the Associate Administrator finds the facility
to have a condition that poses a pipeline integrity risk to public
safety, property, or the environment, the Associate Administrator may
issue a safety order under this section. If the Associate Administrator
does not find that the facility has such a condition, or concludes that
a safety order is otherwise not warranted, the Associate Administrator
will withdraw the notice, and promptly notify the operator in writing.
PHMSA and the operator may enter into a consent agreement at any time
before a safety order is issued.
Termination of a safety order. Once all remedial actions set forth
in the safety order and associated work plans are completed, as
determined by PHMSA, the Associate Administrator will terminate the
safety order and notify the operator of such termination. In any case,
the Associate Administrator may suspend or terminate a safety order
upon a finding that the facility no longer has a condition or
conditions that pose a pipeline integrity risk to public safety,
property, or the environment.
2. Special Permits
Section 10 of the PIPES Act amended 49 U.S.C. 60118(c) to read as
follows:
(c) Waivers by Secretary.--
(1) Nonemergency waivers.--
(A) In general.--On application of an operator of a pipeline
facility, the Secretary by order may waive compliance with any part
of an applicable standard prescribed under this chapter with respect
to such facility on terms the Secretary considers appropriate if the
Secretary determines that the waiver is not inconsistent with
pipeline safety.
(B) Hearing.--The Secretary may act on a waiver under this
paragraph only after notice and an opportunity for a hearing.
(2) Emergency waivers.--
(A) In general.--The Secretary by order may waive compliance
with any part of an applicable standard prescribed under this
chapter on terms the Secretary considers appropriate without prior
notice and comment if the Secretary determines that--
(i) It is in the public interest to grant the waiver;
(ii) The waiver is not inconsistent with pipeline safety; and
(iii) The waiver is necessary to address an actual or impending
emergency involving pipeline transportation, including an emergency
caused by a natural or manmade disaster.
(B) Period of waiver.--A waiver under this paragraph may be
issued for a period of not more than 60 days and may be renewed upon
application to the Secretary only after notice and an opportunity
for a hearing on the waiver. The Secretary shall immediately revoke
the waiver if continuation of the waiver would not be consistent
with the goals and objectives of this chapter.
(3) Statement of reasons.--The Secretary shall state in an order
issued under this subsection the reasons for granting the waiver.
This amendment granted PHMSA new authority to waive compliance with
a pipeline safety regulation on an emergency basis, without the prior
notice and hearing required under the agency's general waiver
authority.
[[Page 16565]]
Special Permit Applications and Procedures. PHMSA now uses the term
``special permits'' to refer to orders granting regulatory waivers. In
most cases, such orders impose conditions requiring the special permit
holder to perform alternative measures, such as integrity assessment
and additional inspections and monitoring, in lieu of the measures
otherwise required by the relevant regulation. Therefore, PHMSA
believes the term ``special permit'' better reflects the limited and
conditional nature of these agency actions.
To clarify the procedures governing special permits, and to
establish new procedures for exercise of the agency's emergency
authority, this interim final rule adds a new section entitled
``Special permits,'' to our administrative procedures in 49 CFR part
190. This interim final rule outlines the procedures under which
pipeline operators (and prospective operators) may request special
permits. It specifies the information that must be provided in each
application and, in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 60118(c)(1)(B), provides
for public notice and comment on applications for nonemergency special
permits.
Our procedures for notice and comment in these cases are comparable
to those governing the adoption or repeal of regulations: PHMSA
ordinarily publishes advance notice in the Federal Register of its
intent to consider a special permit application; invites written
comments on the proposal; and establishes a public docket for
submission of all comments. PHMSA also notifies the state pipeline
safety program manager or other appropriate authority in each affected
state. We address all public comments in our decisions granting or
denying special permits and publish all special permits on the PHMSA
Web site.
These general procedures govern all nonemergency special permit
applications, including those involving proposed new pipelines. In the
case of proposed pipelines, however, additional efforts may be
warranted to notify affected communities of our proceeding. Because
special permits may affect material orders and other investment
decisions, and because a planned pipeline route is subject to change
during the design and permitting process, a prospective operator may
need to seek a special permit in advance of final site selection. In
these cases, we will make special efforts to verify that communities
likely to be affected have notice of the application and opportunity
for comment. PHMSA has no authority over pipeline siting, but we work
closely with appropriate authorities and members of the public to
address site-specific safety concerns. In the case of proposed
interstate natural gas transmission pipelines, PHMSA regularly provides
technical assistance on safety issues to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC), which has exclusive authority over pipeline siting,
including authority to impose site-specific safety controls.
PHMSA inspects new pipelines during construction to verify
compliance with our requirements and engages in ongoing oversight of
pipeline operations. PHMSA has a longstanding record of issuing
corrective action orders to require operators to mitigate imminent
hazards and, in accordance with this interim final rule, now is
prepared to issue safety orders addressing less urgent risk conditions.
On an appropriate record, moreover, PHMSA retains inherent authority to
revoke a special permit, or impose additional conditions, in the
interests of safety. As explained below, this interim final rule sets
forth the procedures and standards that would govern such a
determination. Accordingly, although we would not propose to revoke or
impose additional conditions on a special permit simply because the
pipeline route has changed since issuance, we are prepared to address
safety concerns at any time.
This interim final rule also clarifies the relationship between
special permits and other administrative orders and sets forth the
grounds and procedures under which a special permit may be modified,
suspended, or revoked. To protect the integrity of the special permit
process, PHMSA reserves the right to revoke, suspend, or modify a
special permit at any time if it discovers a material or intentional
misrepresentation or omission in the application; material error in the
agency's evaluation of the special permit application; or a material
change in the circumstances underlying the agency's decision. PHMSA
also will monitor the operator's performance and may suspend or revoke
a special permit based on the holder's failure to comply with any term
or condition of the special permit.
Except as may be warranted in an emergency, PHMSA will take such
action only after providing the operator an opportunity to show cause
why its special permit should not be revoked, suspended, or modified.
This interim final rule also sets forth the administrative procedure
for requesting reconsideration of a denial of an application for a
special permit or revocation of an existing special permit.
Emergency Special Permits. This interim final rule also outlines
the procedures for operators to request emergency special permits.
PHMSA has authority to issue an emergency waiver of a pipeline safety
regulation without prior notice and comment if necessary to address an
emergency involving pipeline transportation. This interim final rule
specifies additional information that must be in the application
concerning how the applicant is being affected by the emergency. In
accordance with the PIPES Act, this rule limits the duration of an
emergency special permit to no longer than 60 days unless renewed.
State Waivers for Intrastate Pipelines. This interim final rule
maintains the existing role that states participating in the oversight
of pipelines pursuant to a certification under 49 U.S.C. 60105 or an
agreement under section 60106 have in granting state waivers for
intrastate pipelines. The PIPES Act does not alter the requirement that
a state pipeline authority give PHMSA 60-day notice of a state waiver.
However, if a state notifies PHMSA that it believes the waiver is
necessary to respond to an emergency involving an intrastate pipeline
subject to state regulation, PHMSA will expedite its review of the
state's decision. Because the PIPES Act does not affect the authority
of a state to waive the requirements of state law, each state regulator
should review its particular state law to determine the extent to which
it has the authority to grant emergency waivers of state pipeline
requirements.
3. Electronic Docket Information Availability
This interim final rule amends Sec. 190.209 by adding a new
paragraph notifying operators that all materials they submit in
response to administrative enforcement actions may be placed on
publicly accessible Web sites. Pursuant to section 6 of the PIPES Act
and in accordance with its commitment to enforcement transparency,
PHMSA has established a Web site that makes information and documents
associated with an administrative enforcement action available to the
public by electronic means. A Respondent that seeks confidential
treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b) for any portion of its responsive
materials must provide a second copy of such materials along with the
complete original document. A Respondent may redact the portions it
believes qualify for confidential treatment in the second copy but must
provide an explanation for each redaction. The interim rule sets forth
this procedure, along with other
[[Page 16566]]
information concerning the agency's new enforcement transparency Web
site. This interim rule also reflects the decommissioning of the
Department's electronic docket management system and the recent
migration to the government-wide electronic docket system found at
regulations.gov and allows electronic service of enforcement documents.
4. Miscellaneous Amendments
On April 20, 2007, PHMSA relocated its headquarters to the new DOT
building at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Accordingly, this interim final rule amends 49 CFR parts 190, 191, 192,
193, 194, 195, and 199 to reflect the new address. In addition, this
rule updates several Web site addresses, telephone numbers, and routing
symbols, and clarifies the time period for processing requests for
written interpretations of the regulations.
Comments on This Interim Final Rule and Effective Date
This interim final rule conforms agency practice and procedures to
current public law and reflects the relocation of PHMSA headquarters.
This rule does not impose any new substantive requirements on operators
or the public. Accordingly, we have determined that it is unnecessary
to precede it with a notice of proposed rulemaking. The Regulatory
Policies and Procedures of DOT (44 FR 1134; February 26, 1979) provide
that, to the maximum extent possible, DOT operating administrations
should provide an opportunity for public comment on regulations issued
without prior notice. Accordingly, we encourage persons to participate
in this rulemaking by submitting comments containing relevant
information, data, or views. We will consider all comments received on
or before the closing date for comments. We will consider late filed
comments so far as practicable.
Although we may later amend it based on comments received, this
interim final rule will go into effect in 30 days. Because the rule
conforms agency practice and procedures to reflect current public law
and does not impose any new substantive requirements on operators or
the public, and because its expeditious issuance facilitates
implementation of the PIPES Act, we find that there is good cause under
5 U.S.C. 553(d) to make this rule effective on April 28, 2008.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This interim final rule is not considered a significant regulatory
action under Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, was
not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. This
interim final rule is not significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034; Feb. 26, 1979). Because this rule conforms
agency practice and procedure to reflect current public law and does
not impose any new substantive requirements on operators or the public,
it has no significant economic impact on regulated entities, and
preparation of a regulatory impact analysis was not warranted.
B. Executive Order 13132
This interim final rule has been analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132
(``Federalism''). This rule does not introduce any regulation that: (1)
Has substantial direct effects on the states, the relationship between
the national government and the states, or the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government; (2)
imposes substantial direct compliance costs on state and local
governments; or (3) preempts state law. Therefore, the consultation and
funding requirements of Executive Order 13132 do not apply. Further,
this rule does not have impacts on federalism sufficient to warrant the
preparation of a federalism assessment.
C. Executive Order 13175
This interim final rule has been analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13175
(``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'').
Because this rule does not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of the Indian tribal governments, the funding and
consultation requirements of Executive Order 13175 do not apply.
D. Executive Order 13211
This interim final rule is not a significant energy action under
Executive Order 13211. It is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. Further, this
rule has not been designated by the Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy action.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because this interim final rule conforms 49 CFR part 190 to the
PIPES Act, updates the part 190 procedures to reflect current public
law, and reflects the relocation of PHMSA headquarters, and will have
no direct or indirect economic impacts for government units,
businesses, or other organizations, I certify that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
This interim final rule contains no new information collection
requirements and imposes no additional paperwork burdens. Therefore,
submitting an analysis of the burdens to OMB pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act was unnecessary.
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This interim final rule does not impose unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It does not result in costs of
$100 million or more, as adjusted for inflation, to either state, local
or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, and
is the least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the
rule.
H. Environmental Assessment
Because this interim final rule conforms agency practice and
procedure to reflect current public law and does not impose any new
substantive requirements on operators or the public, there are no
significant environmental impacts associated with this rule.
List of Subjects 49 CFR Part 190
Administrative practice and procedure; Penalties.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, PHMSA is amending 49 CFR
parts 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, and 199 as follows:
PART 190--PIPELINE SAFETY PROGRAMS AND RULEMAKING PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority citation for part 190 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321; 49 U.S.C. 5101-5127, 60101 et seq.;
49 CFR 1.53.
0
2. In 49 CFR part 190, remove the words ``400 7th Street, SW'' and add,
in their place, the words ``1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE'' in the
following places:
0
a. Section 190.9(b)(1)(ii) and (b)(2);
0
b. Section 190.11(b)(1) and (b)(2);
0
c. Section 190.305 (a) and (b); and
0
d. Section 190.309
[[Page 16567]]
0
3. Section 190.5 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (c) to read
as follows:
Sec. 190.5 Service.
(a) Each order, notice, or other document required to be served
under this part shall be served personally, by registered or certified
mail, overnight courier, or electronic transmission by facsimile or
other electronic means that includes reliable acknowledgement of actual
receipt.
* * * * *
(c) Service by registered or certified mail or overnight courier is
complete upon mailing. Service by electronic transmission is complete
upon transmission and acknowledgement of receipt. An official receipt
for the mailing from the U.S. Postal Service or overnight courier, or a
facsimile or other electronic transmission confirmation, constitutes
prima facie evidence of service.
Sec. 190.11 [Amended]
0
4. Section 190.11 is amended as follows:
0
A. The last sentence of Sec. 190.11(a) is amended by removing the
telephone number ``(202) 366-0918'' and adding in its place the number
``(202) 366-4595''.
0
B. The first sentence of Sec. 190.11(b)(1) is amended by removing the
routing symbol ``(DPS-10)'' and adding in its place ``(PHP-30)''.
0
C. Section 190.11(b)(1) is further amended by adding a new sentence at
the end to read as follows: ``Written requests should be submitted at
least 120 days before the time the requestor needs the response.''
0
5-7. Section 190.209 is amended by adding a new paragraph (d) to read
as follows:
Sec. 190.209 Response options.
* * * * *
(d) All materials submitted by operators in response to enforcement
actions may be placed on publicly accessible Web sites. A Respondent
that seeks confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b) for any portion
of its responsive materials must provide a second copy of such
materials along with the complete original document. A Respondent may
redact the portions it believes qualify for confidential treatment in
the second copy but must provide an explanation for each redaction.
Sec. 190.227 [Amended]
0
8. Section 190.227(a) is amended by removing the routing symbol ``(AMZ-
120)'' and adding in its place ``(AMZ-341)''.
0
9. Section 190.239 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 190.239 Safety orders.
(a) When may PHMSA issue a safety order? If the Associate
Administrator, OPS finds, after notice and an opportunity for hearing
under paragraph (b) of this section, that a particular pipeline
facility has a condition or conditions that pose a pipeline integrity
risk to public safety, property, or the environment, the Associate
Administrator may issue an order requiring the operator of the facility
to take necessary corrective action. Such action may include physical
inspection, testing, repair, risk assessment, risk control, data
integration, information management, or other appropriate action to
remedy the identified risk condition.
(b) How is an operator notified of the proposed issuance of a
safety order and what are its response options? (1) Notice of proposed
safety order. PHMSA will serve written notice of a proposed safety
order under Sec. 190.5 to an operator of the pipeline facility. The
notice will allege the existence of a condition that poses a pipeline
integrity risk to public safety, property, or the environment, and
state the facts and circumstances that support issuing a safety order
for the specified pipeline or portion thereof. The notice will also
specify proposed testing, evaluations, integrity assessment, or other
actions to be taken by the operator and may propose that the operator
submit a work plan and schedule to address the conditions identified in
the notice. The notice will also provide the operator with its response
options, including procedures for requesting informal consultation and
a hearing. An operator receiving a notice will have 30 days to respond.
(2) Informal consultation. Upon timely request by the operator,
PHMSA will provide an opportunity for informal consultation concerning
the proposed safety order. Such informal consultation shall commence
within 30 days, provided that PHMSA may extend this time by request or
otherwise for good cause. Informal consultation provides an opportunity
for the respondent to explain the circumstances associated with the
risk condition(s) identified in the notice and, where appropriate, to
present a proposal for corrective action, without prejudice to the
operator's position in any subsequent hearing. If the respondent and
PHMSA agree within 30 days of the informal consultation on a plan for
the operator to address each risk condition, they may enter into a
written consent agreement and PHMSA may issue a consent order
incorporating the terms of the agreement. If a consent agreement is
reached, no further hearing will be provided in the matter and any
pending hearing request will be considered withdrawn. If a consent
agreement is not reached within 30 days of the informal consultation
(or if informal consultation is not requested), the Associate
Administrator may proceed under paragraphs (b)(3) through (5) of this
section. If PHMSA subsequently determines that an operator has failed
to comply with the terms of a consent order, PHMSA may obtain any
administrative or judicial remedies available under 49 U.S.C. 60101 et
seq. and this part. If a consent agreement is not reached, any
admissions made by the operator during the informal consultation shall
be excluded from the record in any subsequent hearing. Nothing in this
paragraph (b) precludes PHMSA from terminating the informal
consultation process if it has reason to believe that the operator is
not engaging in good faith discussions or otherwise concludes that
further consultation would not be productive or in the public interest.
(3) Hearing. An operator receiving a notice of proposed safety
order may contest the notice, or any portion thereof, by filing a
written request for a hearing within 30 days following receipt of the
notice or within 10 days following the conclusion of informal
consultation that did not result in a consent agreement, as applicable.
In the absence of a timely request for a hearing, the Associate
Administrator may issue a safety order in the form of the proposed
order in accordance with paragraphs (c) through (g) of this section.
(4) Conduct of hearing. An attorney from the Office of Chief
Counsel, PHMSA, will serve as the Presiding Official in a hearing under
this section. The hearing will be conducted informally, without strict
adherence to formal rules of evidence in accordance with Sec. 190.211.
The respondent may submit any relevant information or materials, call
witnesses, and present arguments on the issue of whether a safety order
should be issued to address the alleged presence of a condition that
poses a pipeline integrity risk to public safety, property, or the
environment.
(5) Post-hearing action. Following a hearing under this section,
the Presiding Official will submit a recommendation to the Associate
Administrator concerning issuance of a final safety order. Upon receipt
of the recommendation, the Associate Administrator may proceed under
paragraphs (c) through (g) of this
[[Page 16568]]
section. If the Associate Administrator finds the facility to have a
condition that poses a pipeline integrity risk to public safety,
property, or the environment, the Associate Administrator will issue a
safety order under this section. If the Associate Administrator does
not find that the facility has such a condition, or concludes that a
safety order is otherwise not warranted, the Associate Administrator
will withdraw the notice and promptly notify the operator in writing by
service as prescribed in Sec. 190.5. Nothing in this subsection
precludes PHMSA and the operator from entering into a consent agreement
at any time before a safety order is issued.
(6) Termination of safety order. Once all remedial actions set
forth in the safety order and associated work plans are completed, as
determined by PHMSA, the Associate Administrator will notify the
operator that the safety order has been lifted. The Associate
Administrator shall suspend or terminate a safety order whenever the
Associate Administrator determines that the pipeline facility no longer
has a condition or conditions that pose a pipeline integrity risk to
public safety, property, or the environment.
(c) How is the determination made that a pipeline facility has a
condition that poses an integrity risk? The Associate Administrator,
OPS may find a pipeline facility to have a condition that poses a
pipeline integrity risk to public safety, property, or the environment
under paragraph (a) of this section:
(1) If under the facts and circumstances the Associate
Administrator determines the particular facility has such a condition;
or
(2) If the pipeline facility or a component thereof has been
constructed or operated with any equipment, material, or technique with
a history of being susceptible to failure when used in pipeline
service, unless the operator involved demonstrates that such equipment,
material, or technique is not susceptible to failure given the manner
it is being used for a particular facility.
(d) What factors must PHMSA consider in making a determination that
a risk condition is present? In making a determination under paragraph
(c) of this section, the Associate Administrator, OPS shall consider,
if relevant:
(1) The characteristics of the pipe and other equipment used in the
pipeline facility involved, including its age, manufacturer, physical
properties (including its resistance to corrosion and deterioration),
and the method of its manufacture, construction or assembly;
(2) The nature of the materials transported by such facility
(including their corrosive and deteriorative qualities), the sequence
in which such materials are transported, and the pressure required for
such transportation;
(3) The characteristics of the geographical areas where the
pipeline facility is located, in particular the climatic and geologic
conditions (including soil characteristics) associated with such areas;
(4) For hazardous liquid pipelines, the proximity of the pipeline
to an unusually sensitive area;
(5) The population density and growth patterns of the area in which
the pipeline facility is located;
(6) Any relevant recommendation of the National Transportation
Safety Board issued in connection with any investigation conducted by
the Board;
(7) The likelihood that the condition will impair the
serviceability of the pipeline;
(8) The likelihood that the condition will worsen over time; and
(9) The likelihood that the condition is present or could develop
on other areas of the pipeline.
(e) What information will be included in a safety order? A safety
order shall contain the following:
(1) A finding that the pipeline facility has a condition that poses
a pipeline integrity risk to public safety, property, or the
environment;
(2) The relevant facts which form the basis of that finding;
(3) The legal basis for the order;
(4) The nature and description of any particular corrective actions
to be required of the operator; and
(5) The date(s) by which the required corrective actions must be
taken or completed and, where appropriate, the duration of the order.
(f) Can PHMSA take other enforcement actions on the affected
facilities? Nothing in this section precludes PHMSA from issuing a
Notice of Probable Violation under Sec. 190.207 or taking other
enforcement action if noncompliance is identified at the facilities
that are the subject of a safety order proceeding.
0
10. Section 190.305(b) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 190.305 Regulatory dockets.
* * * * *
(b) Once a public docket is established, docketed material may be
accessed at http://www.regulations.gov. Public comments also may be
submitted at http://www.regulations.gov. Comment submissions must
identify the docket number. You may also examine public docket material
at the offices of the Docket Operations Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building, First Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. You may obtain a
copy during normal business hours, excluding Federal holidays, for a
fee, with the exception of material which the Administrator of PHMSA
determines should be withheld from public disclosure under 5 U.S.C.
552(b) or any other applicable statutory provision.
0
11. Section 190.341 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 190.341 Special permits.
(a) What is a special permit? A special permit is an order by which
PHMSA waives compliance with one or more of the Federal pipeline safety
regulations under the standards set forth in 49 U.S.C. 60118(c) and
subject to conditions set forth in the order. A special permit is
issued to a pipeline operator (or prospective operator) for specified
facilities that are or, absent waiver, would be subject to the
regulation.
(b) How do I apply for a special permit? Applications for special
permits must be submitted at least 120 days before the requested
effective date using any of the following methods:
(1) Direct fax to PHMSA at: 202-366-4566; or
(2) Mail, express mail, or overnight courier to the Associate
Administrator for Pipeline Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., East Building,
Washington, DC 20590.
(c) What information must be contained in the application?
Applications must contain the following information:
(1) The name, mailing address, and telephone number of the
applicant and whether the applicant is an operator;
(2) A detailed description of the pipeline facilities for which the
special permit is sought, including:
(i) The beginning and ending points of the pipeline mileage to be
covered and the Counties and States in which it is located;
(ii) Whether the pipeline is interstate or intrastate and a general
description of the right-of-way including proximity of the affected
segments to populated areas and unusually sensitive areas;
(iii) Relevant pipeline design and construction information
including the year of installation, the material, grade,
[[Page 16569]]
diameter, wall thickness, and coating type; and
(iv) Relevant operating information including operating pressure,
leak history, and most recent testing or assessment results;
(3) A list of the specific regulation(s) from which the applicant
seeks relief;
(4) An explanation of the unique circumstances that the applicant
believes make the applicability of that regulation or standard (or
portion thereof) unnecessary or inappropriate for its facility;
(5) A description of any measures or activities the applicant
proposes to undertake as an alternative to compliance with the relevant
regulation, including an explanation of how such measures will mitigate
any safety or environmental risks;
(6) A description of any positive or negative impacts on affected
stakeholders and a statement indicating how operating the pipeline
pursuant to a special permit would be in the public interest;
(7) A certification that operation of the applicant's pipeline
under the requested special permit would not be inconsistent with
pipeline safety; and
(8) If the application is for a renewal of a previously granted
waiver or special permit, a copy of the original grant of the waiver or
permit.
(d) How does PHMSA handle special permit applications? (1) Public
notice. Upon receipt of an application for a special permit, PHMSA will
provide notice to the public of its intent to consider the application
and invite comment. In addition, PHMSA may consult with other Federal
agencies before granting or denying an application on matters that
PHMSA believes may have significance for proceedings under their areas
of responsibility.
(2) Grants and denials. If the Associate Administrator determines
that the application complies with the requirements of this section and
that the waiver of the relevant regulation or standard is not
inconsistent with pipeline safety, the Associate Administrator may
grant the application, in whole or in part, on a temporary or permanent
basis. Conditions may be imposed on the grant if the Associate
Administrator concludes they are necessary to assure safety,
environmental protection, or are otherwise in the public interest. If
the Associate Administrator determines that the application does not
comply with the requirements of this section or that a waiver is not
justified, the application will be denied. Whenever the Associate
Administrator grants or denies an application, notice of the decision
will be provided to the applicant. PHMSA will post all special permits
on its Web site at http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/.
(e) Can a special permit be requested on an emergency basis? Yes.
PHMSA may grant an application for an emergency special permit without
notice and comment or hearing if the Associate Administrator determines
that such action is in the public interest, is not inconsistent with
pipeline safety, and is necessary to address an actual or impending
emergency involving pipeline transportation. For purposes of this
section, an emergency event may be local, regional, or national in
scope and includes significant fuel supply disruptions and natural or
manmade disasters such as hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, terrorist
acts, biological outbreaks, releases of dangerous radiological,
chemical, or biological materials, war-related activities, or other
similar events. PHMSA will determine on a case-by-case basis what
duration is necessary to address the emergency. However, as required by
statute, no emergency special permit may be issued for a period of more
than 60 days. Each emergency special permit will automatically expire
on the date specified in the permit. Emergency special permits may be
renewed upon application to PHMSA only after notice and opportunity for
a hearing on the renewal.
(f) How do I apply for an emergency special permit? Applications
for emergency special permits may be submitted to PHMSA using any of
the following methods:
(1) Direct fax to the Crisis Management Center at: 202-366-3768;
(2) Direct e-mail to PHMSA at: phmsa.pipeline-
emergencyspecpermit@dot.gov; or
(3) Express mail/overnight courier to the Associate Administrator
for Pipeline Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., East Building, Washington,
DC 20590.
(g) What must be contained in an application for an emergency
special permit? In addition to the information required under paragraph
(c) of this section, applications for emergency special permits must
include:
(1) An explanation of the actual or impending emergency and how the
applicant is affected;
(2) A citation of the regulations that are implicated and the
specific reasons the permit is necessary to address the emergency
(e.g., lack of accessibility, damaged equipment, insufficient
manpower);
(3) A statement indicating how operating the pipeline pursuant to
an emergency special permit is in the public interest (e.g., continuity
of service, service restoration);
(4) A description of any proposed alternatives to compliance with
the regulation (e.g., additional inspections and tests, shortened
reassessment intervals); and
(5) A description of any measures to be taken after the emergency
situation or permit expires--whichever comes first--to confirm long-
term operational reliability of the pipeline facility.
Note to paragraph (g): If PHMSA determines that handling of the
application on an emergency basis is not warranted, PHMSA will
notify the applicant and process the application under normal
special permit procedures of this section.
(h) In what circumstances will PHMSA revoke, suspend, or modify a
special permit?
(1) PHMSA may revoke, suspend, or modify a special permit on a
finding that:
(i) Intervening changes in Federal law mandate revocation,
suspension, or modification of the special permit;
(ii) Based on a material change in conditions or circumstances,
continued adherence to the terms of the special permit would be
inconsistent with safety;
(iii) The application contained inaccurate or incomplete
information, and the special permit would not have been granted had the
application been accurate and complete;
(iv) The application contained deliberately inaccurate or
incomplete information; or
(v) The holder has failed to comply with any term or condition of
the special permit.
(2) Except as provided in paragraph (h)(3) of this section, before
a special permit is modified, suspended or revoked, PHMSA will notify
the holder in writing of the proposed action and the reasons for it,
and provide an opportunity to show cause why the proposed action should
not be taken.
(i) The holder may file a written response that shows cause why the
proposed action should not be taken within 30 days of receipt of notice
of the proposed action.
(ii) After considering the holder's written response, or after 30
days have passed without response since receipt of the notice, PHMSA
will notify the holder in writing of the final decision with a brief
statement of reasons.
(3) If necessary to avoid a risk of significant harm to persons,
property, or the environment, PHMSA may in the
[[Page 16570]]
notification declare the proposed action immediately effective.
(4) Unless otherwise specified, the terms and conditions of a
corrective action order, compliance order, or other order applicable to
a pipeline facility covered by a special permit will take precedence
over the terms of the special permit.
(5) A special permit holder may seek reconsideration of a decision
under paragraph (h) of this section as provided in paragraph (i) of
this section.
(i) Can a denial of a request for a special permit or a revocation
of an existing special permit be appealed? Reconsideration of the
denial of an application for a special permit or a revocation of an
existing special permit may be sought by petition to the Associate
Administrator. Petitions for reconsideration must be received by PHMSA
within 20 calendar days of the notice of the grant or denial and must
contain a brief statement of the issue and an explanation of why the
petitioner believes that the decision being appealed is not in the
public interest. The Associate Administrator may grant or deny, in
whole or in part, any petition for reconsideration without further
proceedings. The Associate Administrator's decision is the final
administrative action.
(j) Are documents related to an application for a special permit
available for public inspection? Documents related to an application,
including the application itself, are available for public inspection
on regulations.gov or the Docket Operations Facility to the extent such
documents do not include information exempt from public disclosure
under 5 U.S.C. 552(b). Applicants may request confidential treatment
under part 7 of this title.
PART 191--TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE:
ANNUAL REPORTS, INCIDENT REPORTS, AND SAFETY-RELATED CONDITION
REPORTS
0
12. The authority citation for part 191 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5121, 60102, 60103, 60104, 60108, 60117,
60118, and 60124; and 49 CFR 1.53.
Sec. 191.7 [Amended]
0
13. The first sentence of Sec. 191.7 is amended by removing the words
``the Information Resources Manager, Office of Pipeline Safety,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department
of Transportation, Room 7128, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,'' and adding in
their place the words ``Office of Pipeline Safety, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, PHP-10, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,''.
Sec. 191.27 [Amended]
0
14. Section Sec. 191.27(b) is amended by removing the words ``the
Information Officer, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW.,'' and adding in its place ``Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration, Department of Transportation, PHP-10, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE.''
PART 192--TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE:
MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
0
15. The authority citation for part 192 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5103, 60102, 60104, 60108, 60109, 60110,
60113, 60116, and 60118; and 49 CFR 1.53.
Sec. 192.7 [Amended]
0
16. The first sentence of Sec. 192.7(b) is amended by removing the
words ``400 Seventh Street, SW.'' and adding in their place the words
``1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.''
Sec. 192.727 [Amended]
0
17. The seventh sentence of Sec. 192.727(g)(1) is amended by removing
the words ``Room 2103, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590;
fax (202) 366-4566; e-mail, roger.little@dot.gov.'' and adding in their
place the words ``PHP-10, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590; fax (202) 366-4566; e-mail
InformationResourcesManager@phmsa.dot.gov.''
Sec. 192.949 [Amended]
0
18. Section 192.949(a) is amended by removing the words ``Room 2103,
400 Seventh Street, SW.'' and adding in their place the words ``PHP-10,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.''
Sec. 192.951 [Amended]
0
19. Section 192.951(a) is amended by removing the words ``Room 2103,
400 Seventh Street, SW.'' and adding in their place the words ``PHP-10,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.''
PART 193--LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS FACILITIES: FEDERAL SAFETY
STANDARDS
0
20. The authority citation for part 193 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5103, 60102, 60103, 60104, 60108, 60109,
60110, 60113, 60118; and 49 CFR 1.53.
Sec. 193.2013 [Amended]
0
21. Section Sec. 193.2013(b) is amended by removing the words ``400
Seventh Street, SW.'' and adding in their place the words ``PHP-30,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.''
PART 194--RESPONSE PLANS FOR ONSHORE OIL PIPELINES
0
22. The authority citation for part 194 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231, 1321(j)(1)(C), (j)(5) and (j)(6);
sec. 2, E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; 49 CFR
1.53.
Sec. 194.119 [Amended]
0
23. The second sentence of Sec. 194.119(a) is amended by removing the
words ``Pipeline Response Plans Officer, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW'' and adding in their place the words ``Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation, PHP 80, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE''.
PART 195--TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS BY PIPELINE
0
24. The authority citation for part 195 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5103, 60102, 60104, 60108, 60109, 60118;
and 49 CFR 1.53.
Sec. 195.3 [Amended]
0
25. Section 195.3(b) is amended by removing the words ``400 Seventh
Street, SW.'' and adding in their place the words ``1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE,''
Sec. 195.57 [Amended]
0
26. Section Sec. 195.57(b), is amended by removing the words
``Information Officer, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW''
and adding in their place the words ``Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration, Department of Transportation, PHP-10, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE.''
Sec. 195.59 [Amended]
0
27. Section 195.59(a) is amended by removing the words ``Room 2103, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590; fax (202) 366-4566; e-mail,
roger.little@dot.gov'', and adding in their place the words ``PHP-10,
1200
[[Page 16571]]
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590; fax (202) 366-4566; e-
mail, ``InformationResourcesManager@phmsa.dot.gov''.
Sec. 195.452 [Amended]
0
28. Section 195.452(m) is amended by removing the words, ``Room 7128,
400 Seventh Street SW.'' and adding in their place the words ``1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE.''
PART 199--DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING
0
29. The authority citation for part 199 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5103, 60102, 60104, 60108, 60117, and
60118; 49 CFR 1.53.
0
30. In 49 CFR part 199, remove the words ``Room 7128, 400 Seventh
Street, SW.'' and add in their place the words ``PHP-60, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE'' in the following places:
0
a. Section 199.119(b); and
0
b. Section 199.229(c).
Issued in Washington, DC on March 18, 2008.
Carl T. Johnson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8-5926 Filed 3-27-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P