[Federal Register: January 11, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 7)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 1690-1695]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr11ja06-6]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Federal Bureau of Investigation
28 CFR Part 105
[Docket No. FBI 112; AG Order No. 2796-2006]
RIN 1110-AA23
Implementation of the Private Security Officer Employment
Authorization Act of 2004
AGENCY: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of Justice.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice (the Department) hereby amends title
28 of the Code of Federal Regulations to authorize access to FBI-
maintained criminal justice information systems to effectuate the
Private Security Officer Employment Authorization Act of 2004, which
was enacted as section 6402 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2004. This law authorizes a fingerprint-based check
of state and national criminal history records to screen prospective
and current private security officers and requires the Attorney General
to issue rules to regulate the ``security, confidentiality, accuracy,
use, submission, dissemination, destruction of information and audits,
and record keeping'' of the criminal history record information (CHRI)
and related information; standards for qualifying as an authorized
employer; and the imposition of fees.
DATES: The rule is effective January 11, 2006. Written comments must be
received on or before March 13, 2006.
ADDRESSES: All comments may be submitted to Assistant General Counsel
Harold M. Sklar, Federal Bureau of Investigation, CJIS Division, 1000
Custer Hollow Road, Module E-3, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306, or by
telefacsimile to (304) 625-3944. To ensure proper handling, please
reference FBI Docket No. 112 on your correspondence. You may view an
electronic version of this proposed rule at http://www.regulations.gov. You may also comment via electronic mail at enexreg@leo.gov. or by using
the http://www.regulations.gov comment form for this regulation. When
submitting comments electronically you must include RIN 1110-AA23 or
FBI Docket No 112 in the subject box.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Assistant General Counsel Harold M.
Sklar, telephone number (304) 625-2000.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 17, 2004, the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2004, Public Law 108-458, became law. Section 6402 of
that Act (The Private Security Officer Employment Authorization Act of
2004) authorizes a fingerprint-based criminal history check of state
and national criminal history records to screen prospective and current
private security officers. Section 6402(d)(2) requires the Attorney
General to publish an interim final or final regulation within 180 days
of the statute's enactment to regulate the ``security, confidentiality,
accuracy, use, submission, dissemination, destruction of information
and audits, and record keeping'' of the CHRI and related information;
standards for qualifying an authorized employer; and the imposition of
fees.
The FBI maintains several criminal justice information systems,
notably the Fingerprint Identification Record System (FIRS) and the
National Crime Information Center (NCIC). Access to the FIRS is
predicated upon fingerprint submission through the Integrated Automated
Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS). Previously enacted federal
law authorizes similar criminal history record checks for persons
engaged in other professions and occupations, such as the banking,
securities, and nursing home industries. In implementing section 6402,
the interim rule seeks to ensure that the exchange of CHRI and related
information relating to the employment of private security guards is
accomplished as fully and effectively as possible, achieving the public
safety goals of section 6402 and recognizing the sensitive nature of
the information involved. To that end, the Department is amending title
28 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to regulate the exchange of
CHRI authorized by section 6402.
Additional Information
The following discussion provides additional information to
participating States, authorized employers, and prospective and current
private security officers on the operation of the interim rule.
a. To initiate a criminal history record check, section
6402(d)(1)(A) requires the submission of ``fingerprints or other means
of positive identification * * *.'' The IAFIS presently utilizes ten
rolled fingerprints (captured or submitted manually or electronically)
to effectuate a search of the FBI's criminal history repository.
Effective June 15, 2005,
[[Page 1691]]
IAFIS has begun to also accept ten ``flat'' fingerprint impressions for
noncriminal justice purposes subject to certain conditions. Other forms
of positive identification cannot currently be accepted.
b. Before an authorized employer may request a criminal history
record check from a participating state, the authorized employer must
execute a certification to the state, developed by the State
Identification Bureau (SIB) or the relevant state agency for purposes
of accepting requests for these background checks, declaring that it is
an authorized employer that employs private security officers; that all
fingerprints and requests for criminal history background checks are
being submitted for private security officers; that it will use the
information obtained as a result of the state and national criminal
history record checks solely for the purpose of screening its private
security officers; and that it will abide by other regulatory
obligations. To help ensure that only legitimate use is made of this
authority, the certification shall be executed under penalties of
perjury, false statement, or other applicable state laws. The
authorized employer will provide a copy of the certification to the
appropriate state agency. The FBI will develop a model certification
form that participating States may use for this purpose.
c. Section 6402 and the interim rule require that an authorized
employer obtain the written consent of an employee to submit the
employee's fingerprints to the SIB to perform a search of the criminal
records. Such consent should clearly indicate the employee's
willingness to undergo a fingerprint-based criminal history record
check for the purpose of employment as a private security officer and
be provided not more than one year prior to the date the check is
requested. In light of the triennial auditing cycle maintained by the
FBI and the States, the authorized employer must retain such consent
forms for no less than three years from the date when the consent was
last used as a basis for a records check request.
d. The Act provides legal authority for a criminal history record
check--the check is permissive, not mandatory. Subject to any contrary
requirements of a particular jurisdiction, an employer may forego
requesting a check or may provide interim employment during the
pendency of a check. The Act does not compel an adverse or favorable
employment determination based upon the results of the check. Nor does
a favorable section 6402 check guarantee employment or provide an
applicant or an employee any legal right or entitlement.
e. In States that do not have state standards for a private
security officer, section 6402(d)(1)(D)(ii)(I)(aa) permits notification
of the fact of ``conviction'' of certain crimes to an employer. In
light of the Act's silence as to the impact of post-conviction relief,
the legal import of the various forms of post-conviction relief shall
be determined by applying the law of the convicting jurisdiction.
f. Section 6402(d)(1)(D) contains two periods for considering
relevant criminal conduct--ten years from convictions for non-felony
crimes involving ``dishonesty or a false statement'' or ``the use or
attempted use of physical force,'' and 365 days for a charge for a
felony that remains unresolved. The statute is silent as to the date
from which such periods should commence. Although the date of
submission by an employer or state agency and the date of processing by
the SIB and FBI may vary for several reasons (including whether the
submission is in manual or electronic form), the date of fingerprint
capture is static. Hence, for uniform application of this federal
statute, these periods should be considered to commence in reference to
the date the fingerprints were taken.
Pursuant to section 6402(d)(1)(D), a State that does not have
``standards for qualifications to be a private officer * * * shall
notify an authorized employer as to the fact of whether an employee has
been * * * charged with a criminal felony for which there has been no
resolution during the preceding 365 days.'' The regulation clarifies
that an employee shall be considered ``charged with a criminal felony
for which there has been no resolution during the preceding 365 days''
if the individual is the subject of a complaint, indictment, or
information, issued within 365 days of the date that the fingerprints
were taken, for a crime punishable by imprisonment for more than one
year.
g. Criminal history records maintained by the SIBs and the FBI
frequently do not include information about the disposition of arrest
records. In light of this fact, the interim rule provides that if
relevant CHRI is missing disposition information, the SIB or
responsible agency will make reasonable efforts to obtain such
information to promote the accuracy of the record and the integrity of
the application of the relevant standards. The interim rule also
provides that if additional time beyond a State's standard response
time is needed to find relevant disposition information, the SIB or
responsible agency may notify the authorized employer that additional
research is necessary before a final response can be provided.
h. It is the general practice of the FBI and SIBs when processing
criminal history background checks for licensing and employment
purposes, such as the checks authorized under Public Law 92-544, to
have the SIB first determine whether the applicant has a criminal
history at the state level. By checking records at the state level
first, a more thorough criminal history check is conducted. If a record
is found at the state level, the SIB may retrieve the remainder of the
record by accessing the FBI's Interstate Identification Index. The FBI
receives fingerprint submissions of individuals who do not have an
identifiable record at the state level and the results of the FBI check
are then returned to the authorized agency. This work process is
reflected in section 105.23(b) of the interim rule.
i. Section 6402(d)(4) authorizes the imposition of a user fee by
the FBI ``to process background checks * * *.'' Additionally, section
6402(d)(4)(C) authorizes a State ``to assess a reasonable fee on an
authorized employer for the costs to the State of administering this
Act.'' The interim rule acknowledges this user fee authority.
j. Section 6402(c)(3)(A) authorizes the Attorney General to exempt
some services from coverage under the Act if it would serve the public
interest. In light of the limited period authorized by statute for the
promulgation of these regulations, the Attorney General has not
determined what services, if any, should be excluded from coverage.
Therefore, the authority provided by section 6402(c)(3)(A) has been
expressly reserved by section 105.27(c) of the regulation.
k. The FBI diligently attempts to maintain accurate and current
CHRI and related information. Although the Act does not expressly
provide a record subject an opportunity to controvert his record,
nonetheless that opportunity is provided generally by other
regulations. See 28 CFR 50.12(b). An employee seeking to review the
CHRI upon which an adverse determination was predicated is authorized
by federal law to receive his CHRI by the submission of fingerprints
and a fee to the FBI. 28 CFR 16.32 et seq., implementing Departmental
Order 556-73. However, inasmuch as the SIB or designated state agency
is in possession of the employee's CHRI (which was predicated upon
positive identification), requiring an employee to comply with the
Departmental Order proceeding is
[[Page 1692]]
unnecessarily expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, a State may
redisseminate the employee's CHRI to the subject of the record in such
cases.
l. Numerous States already have adequate statutory authority under
the auspices of Public Law 92-544 to perform state and national
fingerprint-based criminal history record checks of prospective and
current private security officers, and therefore may elect to opt out
of participation in this program. Other states may, for other reasons,
wish not to participate in this program for national background checks
on private security officers. Congress has therefore provided that a
State may opt out of the Act by enactment of a law or promulgation of a
gubernatorial order. Section 6402(d)(5). If a State elects to opt out
of the Act, these regulations are inapplicable to that State.
m. Section 6402(d)(1)(A) of the Act provides that an authorized
employer ``may submit to the state identification bureau of a
participating State'' a request for a criminal history background check
of a private security guard employee pursuant to the Act. Although the
law does not specify to which participating State the authorized
employer is required to submit the request, it is generally expected
that an authorized employer will seek background checks on its employee
in the state of employment. Some States, however, may opt out from
participating in this background check system even where they have no
applicable Public Law 92-544 statute authorizing state and national
fingerprint-based criminal history checks of prospective and current
private security officers. In addition, some participating states may
take time to set up a process to accept and process the checks under
these regulations. To allow for the possibility of checks authorized by
the Act being done in these circumstances, the interim rule provides
that if an authorized employer is prevented from submitting an
employee's fingerprints because the employee's employment is (1) in a
State that does not have an applicable Public Law 92-544 statute
authorizing state and national fingerprint-based criminal history
checks of prospective and current private security officers and that
has elected to opt out, or (2) in a participating state that does not
yet have a process for accepting such fingerprint submissions under
these regulations, then the employer may submit the employee's
fingerprints to the SIB of another participating State other than the
state of employment provided it obtains the permission of the
accommodating state. Such an arrangement would be voluntary, could
involve the imposition of additional requirements by the alternative
state as a condition to agreeing to do the out-of-state checks, and
would discontinue once the State where the private security guard is
employed makes available a process for doing these checks. Conducting a
national check through an alternative state where possible may be
preferable to no check at all. Conducting the check through the state
of employment is, however, generally preferable inasmuch as such states
are more likely to have records on a subject not available at the FBI
than an alternative state with which an employee has had no contact.
n. Although not required by the statute, States are encouraged to
explore the beneficial use of (1) electronic/livescan fingerprint
capture and submission, and (2) channeling agents to transmit
fingerprints to the FBI and the results of the criminal history checks
to the States.
Comments Invited
The Department is seeking comments regarding this interim rule.
Accordingly, the Department invites interested persons to participate
in this rulemaking by submitting written comments. The Department may
change this rule in light of the comments received.
Good Cause Exception
The Department's implementation of this rule as an immediately
effective interim rule is based on the ``good cause'' exceptions found
at 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and (d)(3). The private security guard
industry is growing rapidly and performing an increasingly vital role
in protecting the public from violent crime and terrorism. As reflected
in the Congressional findings for the Private Security Officer
Employment Authorization Act of 2004, ``private security officers
protect individuals, property, and proprietary information, and provide
protection to such diverse operations as banks, hospitals, research and
development centers, manufacturing facilities, defense and aerospace
contractors, high technology businesses, nuclear power plants, chemical
companies, oil and gas refineries, airports, communication facilities
and operations, office complexes, schools, residential properties,
apartment complexes, gated communities, and others.'' Many of the areas
protected by private security guards may be potential targets for
terrorists or violent criminals. Congress found that the ``threat of
additional terrorist attacks requires cooperation between public and
private sectors and demands professional, reliable, and responsible
security officers for the protection of people, facilities, and
institutions.''
Key to preserving the trust placed by the public in private
security guards performing their protective duties are background
checks that include the CHRI maintained by the FBI. These checks will
help States and the private security guard industry assess the
qualifications of the private security guards performing vital public
safety and homeland security functions. Any delays in implementing such
a program will be detrimental to the public's safety.
Indeed, Congress recognized the need for the rapid implementation
of this program. Section 6402(d)(2) of the Act requires the Attorney
General to issue final or interim final regulations within 180 days of
the law's enactment. The Department believes that the compelling public
safety and homeland security reasons specified by Congress in the
findings of the Act provides good cause in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B) for dispensing with the requirements of prior notice.
These same reasons also provide good cause in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3) for making this rule immediately effective on January 11,
2006.
Applicable Administrative Procedures and Executive Orders
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
The proposed rule has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, section 1(b), Principles of Regulation. The
Department has determined that this rule is a significant regulatory
action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, it
has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule will not have a substantial, direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order
13132, it is determined that this rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The rule meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
[[Page 1693]]
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Attorney General, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), has reviewed this rule and, by approving it,
certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The FBI charges a user fee in
compliance with Public Law 101-515. States must submit $22.00 to the
FBI for each fingerprint forwarded to the FBI in accordance with these
regulations. State fees for such checks can range from $5.00 to $75.00.
This rule, however, imposes minimal costs on businesses, organizations,
or governmental jurisdictions (whether large or small) in that the
submission of fingerprints for State and national criminal background
checks is voluntary on the part of both the authorized employer and the
participating States. Additionally, any costs that may be borne by the
current or prospective employee are expected to be minimal.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995. Additionally, the regulation authorizes State governments to
recoup their costs by collecting a reasonable fee for their services.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. See 5 U.S.C. 804. This
proposed rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more, a major increase in costs or prices, or have
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets. The FBI charges a user fee in compliance with Public
Law 101-515. States must submit $22.00 to the FBI for each fingerprint
submitted pursuant to this provision. State fees for such checks can
range from $5.00 to $75.00. Inasmuch as authorized employers are
permitted and not mandated to request these background checks, and some
States may opt out of doing the checks, it is not known how many such
checks will be requested by the private security guard industry.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The rule does not contain collection of information requirements.
Therefore, clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., is not required.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 105
Administrative practice and procedure, Intergovernmental Relations,
Investigations, Law Enforcement, Privacy.
0
Accordingly, title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 105--CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS
0
1. Revise the heading for part 105 to read as set forth above.
0
2. In part 105, insert a new subpart C to read as follows.
Subpart C--Private Security Officer Employment
Sec.
105.21 Purpose and authority.
105.22 Definitions.
105.23 Procedure for requesting criminal history record check.
105.24 Employee's rights.
105.25 Authorized employer's responsibilities.
105.26 State agency's responsibilities.
105.27 Miscellaneous provisions.
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 534; sec. 6402, Pub. L. 108-458 (18 U.S.C.
534 note).
Sec. 105.21 Purpose and authority.
(a) The purpose of this subpart is to regulate the exchange of
criminal history record information (``CHRI''), as defined in 28 CFR
20.3(d), and related information authorized by Section 6402 (The
Private Security Officer Employment Authorization Act of 2004) (Act) of
Public Law 108-458 (The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention
Act of 2004). Section 6402 authorizes a fingerprint-based criminal
history check of state and national criminal history records to screen
prospective and current private security officers, and section
6402(d)(2) requires the Attorney General to publish regulations to
provide for the ``security, confidentiality, accuracy, use, submission,
dissemination, destruction of information and audits, and record
keeping'' of the CHRI and related information, standards for qualifying
an authorized employer, and the imposition of fees.
(b) The regulations in this subpart do not displace state licensing
requirements for private security officers. A State retains the right
to impose its own licensing requirements upon this industry.
Sec. 105.22 Definitions.
As used in this subpart:
(a) Authorized employer means any person that employs private
security officers and is authorized by the regulations in this subpart
to request a criminal history record information search of an employee
through a state identification bureau. An employer is not authorized
within the meaning of these regulations if it has not executed and
submitted to the appropriate state agency the certification required in
Sec. 105.25(g), if its authority to do business in a State has been
suspended or revoked pursuant to state law, or, in those states that
regulate private security officers, the employer has been found to be
out of compliance with any mandatory standards or requirements
established by the appropriate regulatory agency or entity.
(b) Employee means both a current employee and an applicant for
employment as a private security officer.
(c) Charged, with respect to a criminal felony, means being subject
to a complaint, indictment, or information.
(d) Felony means a crime punishable by imprisonment for more than
one year, regardless of the period of imprisonment actually imposed.
(e) Participating State means a State that has not elected to opt
out of participating in the Act by statutory enactment or gubernatorial
order. A State may decline to participate in the background check
system authorized by the Act by enacting a law or issuing an order by
the Governor (if consistent with state law) providing that the State is
declining to participate. The regulations in this subpart that pertain
to States apply only to participating states.
(f) Person means an individual, partnership, firm, company,
corporation or institution that performs security services, whether for
a third party for consideration or as an internal, proprietary
function.
(g) Private Security Officer means an individual other than an
employee of a Federal, State, or local government whose primary duty is
to perform security services, full or part time, for consideration,
whether armed or unarmed and in uniform or plain clothes, except as may
be excluded from coverage in these regulations, except that the term
excludes--
[[Page 1694]]
(1) Employees whose duties are primarily internal audit or credit
functions;
(2) Employees of electronic security system companies acting as
technicians or monitors; or
(3) Employees whose duties involve the secure movement of
prisoners.
(h) Security services means services, whether provided by a third
party for consideration, or by employees as an internal, proprietary
function, to protect people or property, including activities to:
Patrol, guard, or monitor property (including real property as well as
tangible or intangible personal property such as records, merchandise,
money, and equipment); protect against fire, theft, misappropriation,
vandalism, violence, terrorism, and other illegal activity; safeguard
persons; control access to real property and prevent trespass; or deter
criminal activity on the authorized employer's or another's premises.
This definition does not cover services by the employees described in
Sec. 105.22(f) as excluded from the definition of private security
officer.
(i) State Identification Bureau (SIB) means the state agency
designated by the Governor or other appropriate executive official or
the state legislature to perform centralized recordkeeping functions
for criminal history records and associated services in the States.
Sec. 105.23 Procedure for requesting criminal history record check.
These procedures only apply to participating states. An authorized
employer may obtain a State and national criminal history record check
as authorized by section 6402 of Public Law 105-458 as follows:
(a) An authorized employer is required to execute a certification
to the State, developed by the SIB or the relevant state agency for
purposes of accepting requests for these background checks, declaring
that it is an authorized employer that employs private security
officers; that all fingerprints and requests for criminal history
background checks are being submitted for private security officers;
that it will use the information obtained as a result of the state and
national criminal history record checks solely for the purpose of
screening its private security officers; and that it will abide by
other regulatory obligations. To help ensure that only legitimate use
is made of this authority, the certification shall be executed under
penalties of perjury, false statement, or other applicable state laws.
(b) An authorized employer must obtain a set of fingerprints and
the written consent of its employee to submit those prints for a state
and national criminal history record check. An authorized employer must
submit the fingerprints and appropriate state and federal fees to the
SIB in the manner specified by the SIB.
(c) Upon receipt of an employee's fingerprints, the SIB shall
perform a fingerprint-based search of its criminal records. If no
relevant criminal record is found, the SIB shall submit the
fingerprints to the FBI for a national search.
(d) Upon the conclusion of the national search, the FBI will
disseminate the results to the SIB.
(e) Based upon the results of the state check and, if necessary,
the national check:
(1) If the State has standards for qualifying a private security
officer, the SIB or other designated state agency shall apply those
standards to the CHRI and notify the authorized employer of the results
of the application of the state standards; or
(2) If the State does not have standards for qualifying a private
security officer, the SIB or other designated state agency shall notify
an authorized employer as to the fact of whether an applicant has been:
(i) Convicted of a felony;
(ii) Convicted of a lesser offense involving dishonesty or false
statement if occurring within the previous ten years;
(iii) Convicted of a lesser offense involving the use or attempted
use of physical force against the person of another if occurring within
the previous ten years; or
(iv) Charged with a felony during the previous 365 days for which
there has been no resolution.
(f) The limitation periods set forth in paragraph (e)(2) of this
section shall be determined using the date the employee's fingerprints
were submitted. An employee shall be considered charged with a criminal
felony for which there has been no resolution during the preceding 365
days if the individual is the subject of a complaint, indictment, or
information, issued within 365 days of the date that the fingerprints
were taken, for a crime punishable by imprisonment for more than one
year. The effect of various forms of post-conviction relief shall be
determined by the law of the convicting jurisdiction.
Sec. 105.24 Employee's rights.
An employee is entitled to:
(a) Obtain a copy from the authorized employer of any information
concerning the employee provided under these regulations to the
authorized employer by the participating State;
(b) Determine the status of his or her CHRI by contacting the SIB
or other state agency providing information to the authorized employer;
and
(c) Challenge the CHRI by contacting the agency originating the
record or complying with the procedures contained in 28 CFR 16.34.
Sec. 105.25 Authorized employer's responsibilities.
An authorized employer is responsible for:
(a) Executing and providing to the appropriate state agency the
certification to the State required under Sec. 105.23(a) before a
State can accept requests on private security guard employees;
(b) Obtaining the written consent of an employee to submit the
employee's fingerprints for purposes of a CHRI check as described
herein;
(c) Submitting an employee's fingerprints and appropriate state and
federal fees to the SIB not later than one year after the date the
employee's consent is obtained;
(d) Retaining an employee's written consent to submit his
fingerprints for a criminal history record check for a period of no
less than three years from the date the consent was last used to
request a CHRI check;
(e) Upon request, providing an employee with confidential access to
and a copy of the information provided to the employer by the SIB; and
(f) Maintaining the confidentiality and security of the information
contained in a participating State's notification by:
(1) Storing the information in a secure container located in a
limited access office or space;
(2) Limiting access to the information strictly to personnel
involved in the employer's personnel and administration functions; and
(3) Establishing internal rules on the handling and dissemination
of such information and training personnel with such access on such
rules, on the need to safeguard and control the information, and on the
consequences of failing to abide by such rules.
Sec. 105.26 State agency's responsibilities.
(a) Each State will determine whether it will opt out of
participation by statutory enactment or gubernatorial order and
communicating such determination to the Attorney General. Failure to
inform the Attorney General of the determination will result in a State
being considered a participating State.
(b) Each participating State is responsible for:
(1) Determining whether to establish a fee to perform a check of
state criminal
[[Page 1695]]
history records and related fees for administering the Act;
(2) Developing a certification form for execution by authorized
employers under Sec. 105.25(a) and receiving authorized employers'
certifications;
(3) Receiving the fingerprint submissions and fees from the
authorized employer; performing a check of state criminal history
records; if necessary, transmitting the fingerprints to the FBI;
remitting the FBI fees consistent with established interagency
agreements; and receiving the results of the FBI check;
(4) Applying the relevant standards to any CHRI returned by the
fingerprint check and notifying the authorized employer of the results
of the application of the standards as required under Sec. 105.23(e);
(5) Providing to an employee upon his or her request a copy of CHRI
upon which an adverse determination was predicated; and
(6) Maintaining, for a period of no less than three years,
auditable records regarding
(i) Maintenance and dissemination of CHRI; and
(ii) The employer's certification.
(c) If relevant CHRI is lacking disposition information, the SIB or
responsible agency in a participating State will make reasonable
efforts to obtain such information to promote the accuracy of the
record and the integrity of the application of the relevant standards.
If additional time beyond a State's standard response time is needed to
find relevant disposition information, the SIB or responsible agency
may advise the authorized employer that additional research is
necessary before a final response can be provided. If raised, a
participating State should take into account the effect of post-
conviction relief.
Sec. 105.27 Miscellaneous provisions.
(a) Alternate State availability. (1) An authorized employer may
submit the employee's fingerprints to the SIB of a participating State
other than the State of employment--provided it obtains the permission
of the accommodating State--if the authorized employer is prevented
from submitting an employee's fingerprints because the employee's
employment is in:
(i) A State that does not have an applicable Public Law 92-544
statute authorizing state and national fingerprint-based criminal
history checks of prospective and current private security officers and
has elected to opt out; or
(ii) A participating State that has not yet established a process
for receiving fingerprints and processing the checks under the
regulations in this subpart.
(2) A participating State agreeing to process checks under this
subsection will discontinue doing so if thereafter the State of the
employee's employment establishes a process State and national
fingerprint-based criminal history checks of prospective and current
private security officers.
(b) FBI fees for national check. The fee imposed by the FBI to
perform a fingerprint-based criminal history record check is that
routinely charged for noncriminal justice fingerprint submissions as
periodically noticed in the Federal Register.
(c) Penalties for misuse. (1) In addition to incarceration for a
period not to exceed two years, one who knowingly and intentionally
misuses information (including a State's notification) received
pursuant to the Act may be subject to a fine pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
3571.
(2) Consistent with State law, a violation of these regulations may
also result in the divestiture of ``authorized employer'' status,
thereby precluding an employer which provides security services from
submitting fingerprints for a State and national criminal history
record check.
(d) Exclusion from coverage. [Reserved.]
Dated: January 5, 2006.
Alberto R. Gonzales,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. 06-223 Filed 1-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-02-P