U.S. Geological Survey
Water-Resources Investigations Report 03–4150
Download this report as a PDF
file (2.86 mb)
Download a free copy of
Acrobat Reader
Trends in Suspended-Sediment Concentration at Selected Stream Sites in Kansas,
1970–2002
By James E. Putnam and Larry M. Pope
Knowledge of erosion, transport, and deposition of sediment relative to streams
and impoundments is important to those involved directly or indirectly in the
development and management of water resources. Monitoring the quantity of sediment
in streams and impoundments is important because:
(1) sediment may degrade the water quality of streams for such uses as municipal
water supply,
(2) sediment is detrimental to the health of some species of aquatic animals
and plants, and
(3) accumulation of sediment in water-supply impoundments decreases the amount
of storage and, therefore, water available for users.
One of the objectives of the Kansas Water Plan is to reduce the amount of sediment
in Kansas streams by 2010. During the last 30 years, millions of dollars have
been spent in Kansas watersheds to reduce sediment transport to streams. Because
the last evaluation of trends in suspended-sediment concentrations in Kansas was
completed in 1985, 14 sediment sampling sites that represent 10 of the 12 major
river basins in Kansas were reestablished in 2000. The purpose of this report
is to present the results of time-trend analyses at the reestablished sediment
data-collection sites for the period of about 1970–2002 and to evaluate
changes in the watersheds that may explain the trends.
Time-trend tests for 13 of 14 sediment sampling sites in Kansas for the period
from about 1970 to 2002 indicated that 3 of the 13 sites tested had statistically
significant decreasing suspended-sediment concentrations; however, only 2 sites,
Walnut River at Winfield and Elk River at Elk Falls, had trends that were statistically
significant at the 0.05 probability level. Increasing suspended-sediment concentrations
were indicated at three sites although none were statistically significant at
the 0.05 probability level. Samples from five of the six sampling sites located
upstream from reservoirs indicated decreasing suspended-sediment concentrations.
Watershed impoundments located in the respective river basins may contribute
to the decreasing suspended-sediment trends exhibited at most of the sampling
sites because the impoundments are designed to trap sediment. Both sites that
exhibited statistically significant decreasing suspended-sediment concentrations
have a large number of watershed impoundments located in their respective drainage
basins. The relation between percentage of the watershed affected by impoundments
and trend in suspended-sediment concentration for 11 sites indicated that, as
the number of impoundments in the watershed increases, suspended-sediment concentration
decreases. Other conser-vation practices, such as terracing of farm fields and
contour farming, also may contribute to the reduced suspended-sediment concentrations
if their use has increased during the period of analysis.
Regression models were developed for 13 of 14 sediment sampling sites in Kansas
and can be used to estimate suspended-sediment concentration if the range in
stream discharge for which they were developed is not exceeded and if time trends
in suspended-sediment concentrations are not significant. For those sites that
had a statistically significant trend in suspended-sediment concentration, a
second regression model was developed using samples collected during 2000–02.
Past and current studies by the U.S. Geological Survey have shown that regression
models can be developed between in-stream measurements of turbidity and laboratory-analyzed
sediment samples. Regression models were developed for the relations between
discharge and suspended-sediment concentration and turbidity and suspended-sediment
concentration for 10 sediment sampling sites using samples collected during
2000–02.
CONTENTS
Abstract
Introduction
Background
Factors Affecting Sediment Transport
Study Methods
Site Selection and Sample Collection
Development of Regression Models and Trend Analysis
Results of Trend Analysis
Evaluation of Trend Results
Use of Turbidity to Develop Regression Equations for Estimating Suspended-Sediment Concentration
Future Sediment Data-Collection Needs
Summary and Conclusions
References
Supplemental Information
Putnam, J.E., and Pope, L.M., 2003, Trends in suspended-sediment concentration
at selected stream sites in Kansas, 1970–2002: U.S. Geological Survey
Water-Resources Investigations Report 03–4150, 36 p.
For additional information contact:
Jim Putnam
U.S. Geological Survey
4821 Quail Crest Place
Lawrence, KS 66049-3839
Telephone: (785) 832-3541
Fax: (785) 832-3500
Email: jputnam@usgs.gov
|