Indian
Health
Service. Trends
in
Indian
Health,
2000-2001
Edition. Washington,
DC:
U.S.
Department
of
Health
and
Human
Services,
February
2004.
Indian
Health
Service. Regional
Differences
in
Indian
Health,
2000-2001
Edition. Washington,
DC:
U.S.
Department
of
Health
and
Human
Services,
May
2003.
Office
of
Management
and
Budget. Revisions
to
the
Standards
for
the
Classification
of
Federal
Data
on
Race
and
Ethnicity. Washington,
DC.
October
1997.
Accessed
at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/ombdir15.html.
U.S.
Department
of
Health
and
Human
Services. Healthy
People
2010. 2nd
Ed.
With
Understanding
and
Improving
Health
and
Objectives
for
Improving
Health.
2
vols.
Washington,
DC:
U.S.
Government
Printing
Office,
November
2000.
Indian
Health
Service,
Division
of
Program
Statistics.
Adjusting
for
Miscoding
of
Indian
Race
on
State
Death
Certificates,
November
1996.
Thoroughman
DA,
Frederickson
D,
Cameron
HD,
Shelby
LK,
Cheek
JE.
Racial
misclassification
of
American
Indians
in
Oklahoma
State
surveillance
data
for
sexually
transmitted
diseases.
American
Journal
of
Epidemiology. 2002
Jun
15;155(12):
1137-41.
Centers
for
Disease
Control
and
Prevention.
Case
definitions
for
infectious
conditions
under
public
health
surveillance,
1997;46
(No.
RR-10;1).
Dicker
LW,
Mosure
DJ,
Levine
WC.
Chlamydia
positivity
versus
prevalence:
what’s
the
difference?
Sexually
Transmitted
Diseases. 1998;25:
251-3.
Weinstock
H,
Berman
S,
Cates
W.
Sexually
transmitted
diseases
among
American
youth:
incidence
and
prevalence
estimates,
2000.
Perspectives
on
Sexual
and
Reproductive
Health. 2004;36(1):
6-10.
Chesson
HW,
Blandford
JM,
Gift
TL,
Tao
G,
Irwin
KL.
The
estimated
direct
medical
cost
of
STDs
among
American
youth,
2000.
Abstract
P075.
2004
National
STD
Prevention
Conference.
Philadelphia,
PA.
March
8-11,
2004.
U.S.
Census
Bureau.
The
American
Indian
and
Alaska
Native
Population:
2000—Census
2000
Brief. Washington,
DC.
February
2002.
Cates
W
Jr,
Wasserheit
JN.
Genital
chlamydial
infections:
epidemiology
and
reproductive
sequelae.
American
Journal
of
Obstetrics
and
Gynecology. 1991;164:
1771-1781.
