TABLE 2 Time-Use Comparisons for 1990 and 1995 Data,,,,,,,
,Home,Work,Shop,Other,Travel,,
FEMALE,,,,,,,
Nonworker,,,,,,,
1995,"1,172",,42,166,60,,
1995,(186)*,,(64)*,(170)*,(44),,
1990,"1,220",,35,127,58,,
1990,(209),,(70),(172),(61),,
Worker,,,,,,,
1995,944,313,25,93,65,,
1995,(226)*,(249)*,(49)*,(132)*,(44),,
1990,928,284,30,132,65,,
1990,(357),(357),(69),(191),(64),,
MALE,,,,,,,
Nonworker,,,,,,,
1995,"1,171",,30,177,62,,
1995,(200)*,,(55),(184)*,(46),,,
1990,"1,222",,29,130,59,,,
1990,(211),,(60),(183),(65),,,
Worker,,,,,,,,
1995,900,365,15,90,70,,,
1995,(233),(262)*,(37)*,(136)*,(48),,,
1990,903,338,20,110,69,,,
1990,(360),(367),(59),(189),(71),,,
* denotes significance at 95% level by difference of means test between 1995 and 1990 results. Standard deviations are in parenthesis.,,,,,,,,