![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115150926im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115150926im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115150926im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115150926im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
TABLE 5 A Sample Conditional Probability Table (Version 2)
Excel | CSV
1 |
0 |
10 |
50 |
21 |
35 |
43 |
2 |
2 |
10 |
50 |
70 |
15 |
15 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
30 |
20 |
35 |
45 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
10 |
95 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
80 |
20 |
35 |
45 |
Notes: The algorithm properly finds that for those cases where drivers have a license but not a vehicle at their disposal, the probabilities of motorized trips are low. When a private vehicle is available, the probabilities of motorized trips are high but only if associated with small percentages of high residential land use.
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115150926im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115150926im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115150926im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115150926im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |