![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081010055131im_/http://www.cdc.gov/i/s.gif) |
Maternal and Infant Health: Maternal and Child Health Journal
special issue |
|
Back to Maternal and Infant Health
The Social Context of Pregnancy for African-American Women
Source: Maternal and Child Health Journal, 5(2) 67–140 (2001).
http://www.kluweronline.com/issn/1092-7875/contents*
Foreword: The Social Context of Pregnancy for African American Women:
Implications for the Study and Prevention of Adverse Perinatal Outcomes
Vijaya K. Hogan, Pregnancy and Infant Health
Branch, Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Cynthia D. Ferré, Pregnancy and Infant Health Branch, Division of
Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta,
Georgia
Prologue: Closing the Gap, Opening the Process: Why Study Social Contributors
to Preterm Delivery Among Black Women
Diane L. Rowley, National Center for Chronic
Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
In the United States, the excess rates of infant mortality, VLBW,
and preterm delivery among African American families relative to white
families are known as “the gap.” A group of researchers in the Division
of Reproductive Health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
proposed that the study of causes of the gap in preterm delivery and
the potential interventions to eliminate this disparity required a multidisciplinary
approach to elucidate the biologic pathways, stressors, and social environment
associated with preterm birth. They encouraged studies that examined
the social and political impact of being an African American woman in
the United States, racism, and the combined effects of gender, racism,
and relative social position, as potential unmeasured etiologic factors
that contribute to the gap. The studies conducted represent the expertise
of anthropologists, sociologists, medical researchers, and epidemiologists
who study both individual and social causes and then also provide a
theoretical interpretation by those who lived the experience, (e.g.,
the study participants) rather than just the researchers' interpretation
of the causes of and prevention strategies for the gap.
The Prevalence of Socioeconomic and Behavioral Characteristics and
their Impact on Very Low Birth Weight in Black and White Infants in Georgia
Cynthia J. Berg, Division of Reproductive Health, National Center
for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Lynne S. Wilcox, Division of Reproductive Health, National Center
for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Philip J. d'Almada, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio
Objectives: We examined possible reasons for the disparity
in the rate of very low birth weight (VLBW) delivery (<1500 g) in the
United States between black women and white women. Methods:
Using data from a population-based, case–control study of very low birth
weight infants, we compared the prevalence of sociodemographic and behavioral
characteristics between black and white mothers of normal birth weight
infants; the difference in these characteristics between case and control
mothers; and, using logistic regression, calculated odds ratios for
VLBW for black versus white infants, adjusting for these characteristics.
Results: Although black women were disadvantaged on every
variable examined, they did not report more behavioral risk factors.
Among white women, several traditional risk factors were associated
with VLBW, while among black women, only marital status, cigarette smoking,
and vitamin nonuse were associated with VLBW delivery. Controlling for
the socioeconomic and behavioral factors reduced the odds ratio for
VLBW delivery among black mothers from 3.7 to 3.3. Conclusions:
Racial disparity in socioeconomic status may be greater than our current
ability to adjust for it in epidemiologic studies. The fact that traditional
risk factors were not associated with VLBW delivery in black women may
be due to the very high prevalence of these risk factors among black
women or to different or additional risks or stresses experienced by
black women.
Qualitative Methodologies and Community Participation in Examining
Reproductive Experiences: The Harlem Birth Right Project
Leith Mullings, Department of Anthropology,
Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York, New
York, New York
Alaka Wali, The Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois
Diane McLean, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York
Janet Mitchell, Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center, New York, New
York
Sabiyha Prince, Department of Anthropology, Graduate School and University
Center, City University of New York, New York, New York
Deborah Thomas, Department of Anthropology, Graduate School and University
Center, City University of New York, New York, New York
Patricia Tovar, Colombian Institute of Anthropology and History,
National University, Bogotá, Colombia
Objectives: Racial disparities in health present a
challenge to public health because of the complexity of interacting
social forces. The Harlem Birth Right Project sought to improve understanding
of these forces by using qualitative and community participatory methods.
In this paper we 1) describe the process of qualitative inquiry and
community involvement, 2) evaluate the impact of community participation,
and 3) present a brief summary of the findings on social context as
it relates to pregnancy outcomes of women in Harlem. Methods:
We operationalized the qualitative method by combining participant
observation, longitudinal case studies, and focus groups. An ethnographic
survey was used to verify and triangulate findings across methods of
data collection. We involved the community in the design, implementation,
and analysis by collaborating with community-based organizations, setting
up a community advisory board, and the use of dialogue groups and community
meetings. Results: The use of qualitative methods and
community partnership uncovered important aspects of the social context
of women's lives that may not have emerged through traditional epidemiologic
research. We found that pregnancy may serve as a catalyst to increase
perception of the magnitude of preexisting social stressors. Several
stressors and chronic strains associated with structural forces were
identified. For example, the high percentage of households headed by
women is seen as one consequence of larger structural forces. While
social support networks serve as an important coping mechanism to buffer
against the stress caused by these structural forces, the types of support
women seek differs by social strata, and some strategies were identified
as being substantially more effective than others. Conclusions:
Qualitative and community participatory research can be successfully
conducted to support public health goals and can derive important new
information on the social context of women's lives.
Examining the Burdens of Gendered Racism: Implications for Pregnancy
Outcomes Among College-Educated African American Women
Fleda Mask Jackson, Rollins School of Public
Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
Mona Taylor Phillips, Spelman College, Atlanta, Georgia
Carol J. Rowland Hogue, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University,
Atlanta, Georgia
Tracy Y. Curry-Owens, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University,
Atlanta, Georgia
Objectives: As investigators increasingly identify
racism as a risk factor for poor health outcomes (with implications
for adverse birth outcomes), research efforts must explore individual
experiences with and responses to racism. In this study, our aim was
to determine how African American college-educated women experience
racism that is linked to their identities and roles as African American
women (gendered racism). Methods: Four hundred seventy-four
(474) African American women collaborated in an iterative research process
that included focus groups, interviews, and the administration of a
pilot stress instrument developed from the qualitative data. Analysis
of the qualitative and quantitative data from the responses of a subsample
of 167 college-educated women was conducted to determine how the women
experienced racism as a stressor. Results: The responses
of the women and the results from correlational analysis revealed that
a felt sense of obligations for protecting children from racism and
the racism that African American women encountered in the workplace
were significant stressors. Strong associations were found between pilot
scale items where the women acknowledged concerns for their abilities
to provide for their children's needs and to the women's specific experiences
with racism in the workplace (r = 0.408, p < .001). Conclusions:
We hypothesize that the stressors of gendered racism that precede
and accompany pregnancy may be risk factors for adverse birth outcomes.
Pregnancy Discovery and Acceptance Among Low-Income Primiparous Women:
A Multicultural Exploration
Nadine R. Peacock, Division of Community Health
Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago,
Illinois. Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois at Chicago,
Chicago, Illinois
Michele A. Kelley, Division of Community Health Sciences, School
of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Health Research and Policy Centers, School of Public Health, University
of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Colleen Carpenter, Department of Health Behavior and Health Education,
School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North
Carolina
Margaret Davis, Southside Health Consortium, Chicago, Illinois
Glenda Burnett, Mile Square Health Center, University of Illinois at Chicago,
Chicago, Illinois
Noel Chavez, Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public
Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Verónica Aranda, Health Research and Policy Centers, School of Public
Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Members of the Chicago Social Networks Project
Objectives: As part of a larger study exploring psychosocial
factors that influence self-care and use of health care services during
pregnancy, we investigated the process of pregnancy discovery and acceptance
among a culturally diverse group of women who had given birth to their
first child in the year preceding data collection. Methods:
Eighty-seven low-income women from four cultural groups (African
American, Mexican, Puerto Rican, and white) participated in eight focus
groups held in their communities. The focus groups were ethnically homogenous
and stratified by early and late entry into prenatal care. A social
influence model guided the development of focus group questions, and
the study followed a participatory action research model, with community
members involved in all phases of the research. Results:
Issues that emerged from the focus groups as possible influences on
timing of pregnancy recognition include the role of pregnancy signs
and symptoms and pregnancy risk perception in the discovery process,
the role of social network members in labeling and affirming the pregnancy,
concerns about disclosure, “planning” status of the pregnancy, and perceived
availability of choices for resolving an unintended pregnancy.
Conclusions: The pregnancy discovery process is complex,
and when protracted, can potentially result in delayed initiation of
both prenatal care and healthful pregnancy behaviors. Enhancing our
understanding of pregnancy discovery and acceptance has clear implications
for primary and secondary prevention. Future research is needed to further
explain the trajectory of pregnancy discovery and acceptance and its
influence on health behaviors and pregnancy outcome.
Stress and Preterm Birth: Neuroendocrine, Immune/Inflammatory,
and Vascular Mechanisms
Pathik D. Wadhwa, Departments of Psychiatry
& Human Behavior and Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Medicine, Irvine,
University of California, Irvine, California
Jennifer F. Culhane, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Thomas
Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Virginia Rauh, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University,
New York, New York
Shirish S. Barve, Department of Medicine, University of Louisville
College of Medicine,
Louisville, Kentucky
A growing literature suggests that maternal psychological and social
stress is a significant and independent risk factor for a range of adverse
reproductive outcomes including preterm birth. Several issues remain
to be addressed about stress and vulnerability to stress during pregnancy.
Of these, perhaps one of the most important questions relates to biologic
plausibility. Parturition, the process that results in birth, is a biological
phenomenon. Very little empirical research to date, however, has examined
the role of biological processes, if any, as mediators of the relationship
between stress and preterm birth. In this paper we discuss the maternal,
placental, and fetal neuroendocrine, immune/inflammatory, and vascular
processes that may bridge the experience of social adversity before
and during pregnancy and the biological outcome of preterm birth.
Jennifer F. Culhane, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson
University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Virginia Rauh, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health,
NYC, New York
Kelly Farley McCollum, The Health Federation of Philadelphia, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
Vijaya K. Hogan, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division
of Reproductive Health, Atlanta, Georgia
Kathy Agnew, University of Washington, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Seattle, Washington
Pathik D. Wadhwa, Departments of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, and
Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of California,
Irvine, California. UC Irvine Behavioral Perinatology Research Program,
Irvine, California
Objectives: Maternal infection, particularly bacterial
vaginosis (BV) in pregnancy, is one of the leading causes of adverse
perinatal outcomes. The determinants of individual differences in susceptibility,
or vulnerability, to maternal infections are poorly understood. This
study examines whether chronic maternal stress predisposes women to
infection during pregnancy, and if so, whether the effects of chronic
stress on infection are independent of other established risk factors.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, clinical prevalence
study of chronic maternal stress and BV status in a sample of 454 pregnant
women at 14.3 ± 0.3 weeks gestation (±SEM). BV was diagnosed by Gram-stain
of vaginal fluid samples; chronic maternal stress was assessed using
the Cohen Perceived Stress Scale. Other established risk factors for
BV, including maternal age, race/ethnicity, marital status, SES, and
behaviors related to feminine hygiene, sexual practices, and substance
use, were measured using a structured interview. Results:
Of the 454 women enrolled in this study, 224 (49%) were BV positive
(Nugent score 7–10), 64 (14%) had intermediate vaginal flora (Nugent
score 4–6), and 166 (37%) were BV negative (Nugent score 0–3). BV+ women
had significantly higher chronic stress levels than BV- women (24.6
± 0.5 vs. 22.2 ± 0.6 units (±SEM), respectively; t = 3.19; p < .01).
Maternal sociodemographic variables (African-American race/ethnicity)
and behavioral characteristics (vaginal douching, number of lifetime
sexual partners, and use of illicit drugs) also were significantly associated
with the presence of BV. After controlling for the effects of these
variables, using a multivariable logistic regression model, chronic
maternal stress remained a significant and independent predictor of
BV status. Women in the moderate-stress group (third quartile) and high-stress
(fourth quartile) group were 2.3 times (95% CI = 1.2–4.3) and 2.2 times
(95% CI = 1.1–4.2) more likely to be BV+ than women in the low-stress
group (bottom quartile). Conclusions: High levels of chronic
stress during pregnancy are associated with bacterial vaginosis. The
effect of chronic maternal stress is independent of the effects of other
established sociodemographic and behavioral risk factors for BV.
Commentary: Eliminating Disparities in Perinatal Outcomes—Lessons
Learned
Vijaya K. Hogan, Pregnancy and Infant Health
Branch, Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Terry Njoroge, Pregnancy and Infant Health Branch, Division of Reproductive
Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Tonji M. Durant, Pregnancy and Infant Health Branch, Division of
Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta,
Georgia
Cynthia D. Ferre , Pregnancy and Infant Health Branch, Division of
Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta,
Georgia
The disparity between blacks and whites in perinatal health ranges
from a 2.3-fold excess risk among black women for preterm delivery and
infant mortality to a 4-fold excess risk among black women for maternal
mortality. To stimulate concerted public health action to address such
racial and ethnic disparities in health, the national Healthy People
objectives call for elimination of all health disparities by the year
2010. Eliminating health disparities requires a greater understanding
of the factors that contribute to their development. This commentary
summarizes the state of the science of reducing such disparities and
proposes a framework for using the results of qualitative studies on
the social context of pregnancy to understand, study, and address disparities
in infant mortality and preterm delivery. Understanding the social context
of African American women's lives can lead to an improved understanding
of the etiology of preterm birth, and can help identify promising new
interventions to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in preterm delivery.
* |
Links to non-Federal organizations found at this site are provided solely as a service to our users. These links do not constitute an endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the Federal Government, and none should be inferred. The CDC is not responsible for the content of the individual organization Web pages found at these links.
|
Back to Maternal and Infant Health
Date last reviewed:
03/21/2006
Content source: Division
of Reproductive Health, National
Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081010055131im_/http://www.cdc.gov/i/s.gif) |
|