[Federal Register: January 6, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 4)]
[Notices]
[Page 1275-1277]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06ja05-76]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-499]
In the Matter of Certain Audio Digital-to-Analog Converters and
Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Decision To Review and
Reverse One Finding of the Administrative Law Judge in a Final Initial
Determination; Commission Determination Not To Review the Remainder of
the Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337: Schedule
for the Filing of Written Submissions on the Issues of Remedy, the
Public Interest, and Bonding
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review and reverse a finding contained in
the final initial determination (``ID'') issued by the presiding
administrative law judge (``ALJ'') in the above-captioned investigation
on November 15, 2004. Specifically, the Commission has determined to
review and reverse the ID's finding that the '928 patent is
unenforceable due to incorrect inventorship in view of a recently
issued Certificate of Correction by the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office (USPTO). The Commission has determined not to review the
remainder of the ID, thereby finding a violation of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the above-captioned
investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy P. Monaghan, Esq., Office of
the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3152. Copies of the
public version of the ID and all nonconfidential documents filed in
connection with this investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in
the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing-
impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
[[Page 1276]]
205-1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on November 14, 2003, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Cirrus
Logic, Inc. of Austin, TX (``Cirrus''). 68 FR 64641 (Nov. 14, 2003).
The complaint, as supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 in
the importation into the United States, sale for importation, and sale
within the United States after importation of certain audio digital-to-
analog converters and products containing same by reason of
infringement of claims 1 and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,492,928 (``the
'928 patent''). The notice of investigation named Wolfson
Microelectronics, PLC of Edinburgh, United Kingdom; and Wolfson
Microelectronics, Inc. of San Diego, CA (collectively ``Wolfson'') as
respondents.
On December 29, 2003, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 5) granting
complainant's motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation
to add allegations of infringement of claims 2, 3, 5, 6, and 15 of the
'928 patent, and of claims 9, 12, and 19 of U.S. Patent No. 6,011,501
(``the `501 patent''). 69 FR 4177 (Jan. 28, 2004). On July 1, 2004, the
ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 16) granting complainant's motion to
terminate the investigation as to claims 1 and 2 of the '928 patent. On
July 27, 2004, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 24) granting
complainant's motion to terminate the investigation in part as to claim
11 of the '928 patent. Orders Nos. 5, 16, and 24 were not reviewed by
the Commission; consequently, claims 3, 5, 6 and 15 of the '928 patent
and claims 9, 12, and 19 of the '501 patent remain in the
investigation. An evidentiary hearing was held from August 3-August 11,
2004.
On November 15, 2004, the ALJ issued his final ID finding a
violation of section 337 based on his findings that the asserted claims
of the '501 patent are infringed, that they are not invalid in view of
any prior art, and that claims 9 and 12 of the '501 patent are not
invalid because of failure to provide an enabling written description
of the claimed invention. The ALJ found that the '928 patent is
unenforceable because the inventors intentionally withheld highly
material prior art from the examiner during the prosecution of the '928
patent application at the USPTO. Independently, the ALJ found that the
'928 patent is unenforceable because one person was mistakenly listed
as an inventor on the patent. On November 23, 2004, a certificate
correcting inventorship was issued by the USPTO. Accordingly,
unenforceability on this ground has been cured. Viskase Corp. v.
American National Can Co., 261 F.3d 1316, 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
(``Absent fraud or deceptive intent, the correction of inventorship
does not affect the validity or enforceability of the patent for the
period before the correction.''). The ALJ found that the accused
devices infringe the asserted claims of the '928 patent, if
enforceable, and that the asserted claims of the '928 patent are not
invalid in view of any prior art, or for failure to provide an enabling
written description of the claimed invention or for failure to disclose
the best mode. The ALJ also issued his recommendations on remedy and
bonding during the period of Presidential review on November 15, 2004.
On November 30, 2004, Cirrus, Wolfson, and the Commission's
investigative attorney filed petitions for review of the final ID. On
December 7, 2004, all parties filed responses.
Having examined the record in this investigation, including the
ALJ's final ID, the petitions for review, and the responses thereto,
the Commission has determined to review and reverse the ID's finding
that the '928 patent is unenforceable due to incorrect inventorship in
view of the recently issued certificate of correction by the USPTO. The
Commission has determined not to review the remainder of the ID,
thereby finding a violation of section 337.
In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the
Commission may issue (1) an order that could result in the exclusion of
the subject articles from entry into the United States, and/or (2)
cease and desist orders that could result in respondents being required
to cease and desist from engaging in unfair action in the importation
and sale of such articles. Accordingly, the Commission is interested in
receiving written submissions that address the form of remedy, if any,
that should be ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an article from
entry into the United States for purposes other than entry for
consumption, the party should so indicate and provide information
establishing that activities involving other types of entry are either
adversely affecting it or likely to do so. For background, see In the
Matter of Certain Devices for Connecting Computers via Telephone Lines,
Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994) (Commission
Opinion).
When the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must
consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The
factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an
exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders would have on (1) the
public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S.
economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly
competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.
consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written
submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in
the context of this investigation.
If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the President has 60
days to approve or disapprove the Commission's action. During this
period, the subject articles would be entitled to enter the United
States under a bond, in an amount determined by the Commission and
prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The Commission is
therefore interested in receiving submissions concerning the amount of
the bond that should be imposed.
Written Submissions: The parties to the investigation, interested
government agencies, and any other interested persons are encouraged to
file written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest,
and bonding. Such submissions should address the ALJ's recommended
determination on remedy and bonding. Complainant and the Commission
investigative attorney are also requested to submit proposed remedial
orders for the Commission's consideration. The written submissions and
proposed remedial orders must be filed no later than the close of
business on Monday, January 10, 2005, and reply submissions must be
filed no later than close of business on Monday, January 17, 2005. No
further submissions will be permitted unless otherwise ordered by the
Commission.
Persons filing written submissions must file the original document
and 14 true copies thereof with the Office of the Secretary on or
before the deadlines stated above. Any person desiring to submit a
document (or portions thereof) to the Commission in confidence must
request confidential treatment unless the information has already been
granted such treatment during the proceedings. All such requests should
be directed to the Secretary of the Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
[[Page 1277]]
Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 210.5. Documents for
which confidential treatment is granted by the Commission will be
treated accordingly. All nonconfidential written submissions will be
available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary.
This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and sections 210.42,
210.46, and 210.50 of the Commission's Interim Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42, 210.46, and 210.50).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 30, 2004.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-251 Filed 1-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P