[Federal Register: July 29, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 145)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 43771-43773]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29jy05-16]
[[Page 43771]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 147
[CGD08-05-015]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Outer Continental Shelf Facility in the Gulf of
Mexico for Green Canyon 787
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone around a
petroleum and gas production facility in Green Canyon 787 of the Outer
Continental Shelf in the Gulf of Mexico. The facility needs to be
protected from vessels operating outside the normal shipping channels
and fairways, and placing a safety zone around this area will
significantly reduce the threat of allisions, oil spills and releases
of natural gas. This rule prohibits all vessels from entering or
remaining in the specified area around the facility's location except
under specified conditions.
DATES: This final rule is effective on October 1, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket [CGD08-05-015] and are available for inspection or
copying at Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District (m), Hale Boggs
Federal Bldg., 500 Poydras Street, New Orleans, LA, between 8 a.m. and
3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant (LT) Kevin Lynn, Project
Manager for Eighth Coast Guard District Commander, Hale Boggs Federal
Bldg., 500 Poydras Street, New Orleans, LA 70130, telephone (504) 589-
6271.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory History
On March 23, 2005, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Safety Zone; Outer Continental Shelf Facility in the
Gulf of Mexico for Green Canyon 787'' in the Federal Register (70 FR
14612). We received no comments on the proposed rule. No public hearing
was requested, and none was held.
Background and Purpose
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone around the Atlantis
Semi-Submersible facility, a petroleum and gas production facility in
the Gulf of Mexico in Green Canyon 787 (GC 787), located at position
27[deg]11[min]44[sec] N, 90[deg]01[min]37[sec] W.
This safety zone is in the deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico.
For the purposes of this regulation it is considered to be in waters of
304.8 meters (1,000 feet) or greater depth extending to the limits of
the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) contiguous to the territorial sea of
the United States and extending to a distance up to 200 nautical miles
from the baseline from which the breadth of the sea is measured.
Navigation in the area of the safety zone consists of large commercial
shipping vessels, fishing vessels, cruise ships, tugs with tows and the
occasional recreational vessel. The deepwater area of the Gulf of
Mexico also includes an extensive system of fairways. The fairway
nearest the safety zone is the South of Gulf Safety Fairway.
Significant amounts of vessel traffic occur in or near the various
fairways in the deepwater area.
British Petroleum Exploration and Production, Inc., hereafter
referred to as BP, has requested that the Coast Guard establish a
safety zone in the Gulf of Mexico around the Atlantis Semi-Submersible
facility.
The request for the safety zone was made due to the high level of
shipping activity around the facility and the associated safety
concerns for both the onboard personnel and the environment.
Information provided by BP to the Coast Guard indicates that the
location, production level, and personnel levels on board the facility
make it highly likely that any allision with the facility or its
mooring system would result in a catastrophic event.
The Coast Guard has evaluated BP's information and concerns against
Eighth Coast Guard District criteria developed to determine if an Outer
Continental Shelf facility qualifies for a safety zone. Several factors
were considered to determine the necessity of a safety zone for the
Atlantis Semi-Submersible facility: (1) The facility is located
approximately 36 nautical miles south of the South of Gulf Safety
Fairway; (2) the facility will have a high daily production capacity of
petroleum oil and gas per day; (3) the facility will be manned; and (4)
the facility is a semi-submersible type platform.
We conclude that the risk of allision to the facility and the
potential for loss of life and damage to the environment resulting from
such an accident warrants the establishment of this safety zone. This
rule will significantly reduce the threat of allisions, oil spills and
natural gas releases and increase the safety of life, property, and the
environment in the Gulf of Mexico.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
We received no comments on the proposed rule. This facility was
originally expected to be on location beginning September 1, 2005.
Subsequent discussions with BP indicate the date has changed to October
1, 2005. Therefore, the effective date of this rule will be October 1,
2005. No other changes to this final rule have been made.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
It is not significant under the regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full regulatory evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary. The impacts on routine navigation are expected
to be minimal because the safety zone will not overlap any of the
safety fairways within the Gulf of Mexico.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Since the Atlantis Semi-Submersible is located far offshore,
few privately owned fishing vessels and recreational boats/yachts
operate in the area. This rule will not impact an attending vessel or
vessels less than 100 feet in length overall not engaged in towing.
Alternate routes are available for all other vessels impacted by this
rule. Use of an alternate route may cause a vessel to incur a delay of
four to ten minutes in arriving at their destinations depending on how
fast the vessel is traveling. Therefore, the Coast Guard expects the
[[Page 43772]]
impact of this regulation on small entities to be minimal.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that Order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1 paragraph (34)(g), of the instruction, from further
environmental documentation because this rule is not expected to result
in any significant environmental impact as described in NEPA.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 147
Continental shelf, Marine safety, Navigation (water).
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 147 as follows:
PART 147--SAFETY ZONES
0
1. The authority citation for part 147 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 85; 43 U.S.C. 1333; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 147.841 to read as follows:
Sec. 147.841 Atlantis Semi-Submersible safety zone.
(a) Description. Atlantis Semi-Submersible, Green Canyon 787 (GC
787), located at position 27[deg]11'44'' N, 90[deg]01'37'' W. The area
within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the structure's
outer edge is a safety zone. These coordinates are based upon [NAD 83].
(b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone
except the following:
(1) An attending vessel;
[[Page 43773]]
(2) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in
towing; or
(3) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District.
Dated: July 14, 2005.
R.F. Duncan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05-15075 Filed 7-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P