[Federal Register: November 5, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 214)]
[Notices]               
[Page 62570-62571]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05no03-51]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENGERY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP04-10-000]

 
EnCana Border Pipelines Limited and Omimex Canada, Ltd.; Notice 
of Application

October 30, 2003.
    On October 24, 2003, EnCana Border Pipelines Limited (EnCana 
Border), formerly 3698157 Canada Ltd., and Omimex Canada, Ltd. (Omimex) 
filed an application requesting the Commission to issue an order 
transferring 3698157 Canada Ltd 's NGA Section 3 authorization and 
Presidential Permit to Omimex to operate and maintain

[[Page 62571]]

facilities at the international boundary between the United States and 
Canada at Reagan, Alberta and Del Bonita, Montana for the importation 
of natural gas into the United States, all as more fully set forth in 
the application on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection. This filing may be viewed on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov 
using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last 
three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov 
or toll-free at (866) 208-3676, or for TTY, contact (202) 502-8659.
    EnCana Border and Ominex state that the facilities consist of 
approximately one mile of 4\1/2\ inch pipe extending from the 
interconnection with the EnCana Border system on the northern side of 
the international boundary between the United States and Canada in a 
southerly direction to the interconnection with the 4-inch gathering 
line owned by Northwestern Corporation, formerly Montana Power Gas 
Company.
    EnCana Border and Omimex state that approval of the subject request 
would facilitate the sale of the facilities to Omimex pursuant to a 
Purchase and Sale Agreement between EnCana Border and Omimex. The 
transfer will not affect the underlying use of the Facilities or the 
services that are currently provided to customers on the Facilities.
    Any questions regarding the application should be directed to 
Stefan M. Krantz, Esquire, Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP, 2101 
L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037, at (202) 861-9113.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of 
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by 
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or 
before the comment date stated below file with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a 
motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person 
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by 
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all 
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must 
submit 14 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a 
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only 
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission Orders 
in the proceeding.
    A person does not have to intervene in order to have comments 
considered. The second way to participate is by filing with the 
Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and two 
copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project. The 
Commission will consider these comments in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will not serve to 
make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's rules 
require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project 
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly 
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of 
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments 
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be 
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive 
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings 
associated with the Commission's environmental review process. 
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed 
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will 
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by 
the Commission (except for mailing of environmental documents issued by 
the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court review of the 
Commission's final order.
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically 
via the Internet in lieu of paper. The Commission strongly encourages 
electronic filings. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and instructions on 
the Commission's web site under the ``e-Filing'' link.
    If the Commission decides to set the application for a formal 
hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, the Commission will issue 
another notice describing that process. At the end of the Commission's 
review process, a final Commission order approving or denying a 
certificate will be issued.
    Comment Date: November 20, 2003.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E3-00181 Filed 11-04-03; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P