[Federal Register: December 9, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 236)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 68577-68578]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09de03-33]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
32 CFR Part 312
Office of the Inspector General; Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY: Office of the Inspector General, DoD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of the Inspector General, DoD (OIG, DoD) is
proposing to exempt the system of records CIG-21, entitled
``Congressional Correspondence Tracking System'' from 5 U.S.C.
552a(j)(2), (k)(1) through (k)(7). The exemption is needed because
during the course of a Congressional inquiry, exempt materials from
other systems of records may in turn become part of the case records in
the system. To the extent that copies of exempt records from those
``other'' systems of records are entered into the Privacy Act case
records, the Inspector General, DoD, hereby claims the same exemptions
for the records from those ``other'' systems that are entered into this
system, as claimed for the original primary systems of records of which
they are a part. In addition, two administrative changes are also being
made.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 9, 2004, to be
considered by this agency.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Office of the Inspector General, Department
of Defense, 400 Army Navy Drive, Room 223, Arlington, VA 22202-4704.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Darryl R. Aaron at (703) 604-9785.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) Have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity;
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State,
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive Order.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because they are concerned only with the
administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department
of Defense.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Office of the
Inspector General and that the information collected within the Office
of the Inspector General is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C.
552a, known as the Privacy Act of 1974.
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been determined that the Privacy Act rulemaking for the
Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and
that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been determined that the Privacy Act rules for the
Department of Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 312
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 312 is proposed to be amended to read as
follows:
PART 312--OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL (OIG) PRIVACY PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 312 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
2. Section 312.8, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 312.8 OIG review of request for amendment.
(a) A written acknowledgement of the receipt of a request for
amendment of a
[[Page 68578]]
record will be provided to the requester within 20 working days, unless
final action regarding approval or denial will constitute
acknowledgement.
* * * * *
3. Section 312.12, paragraph (b) is revised and paragraph (i) is
added to read as follows:
Sec. 312.12 Exemptions.
* * * * *
(b) The Inspector General of the Department of Defense claims an
exemption for the following record systems under the provisions of 5
U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k)(1)-(k)(7) from certain indicated subsections of
the Privacy Act of 1974. The exemptions may be invoked and exercised on
a case-by-case basis by the Deputy Inspector General for Investigations
or the Director, Communications and Congressional Liaison Office, and
the Chief, Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Office which serve as the
Systems Program Managers. Exemptions will be exercised only when
necessary for a specific, significant and legitimate reason connected
with the purpose of the records system.
* * * * *
(i) System Identifier: CIG-21.
(1) System name: Congressional Correspondence Tracking System.
(2) Exemption: During the processing of a Congressional inquiry,
exempt materials from other systems of records may in turn become part
of the case record in this system. To the extent that copies of exempt
records from those ``other'' systems of records are entered into this
system, the Inspector General, DoD, claims the same exemptions for the
records from those ``other'' systems that are entered into this system,
as claimed for the original primary system of which they are a part.
(3) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2), (k)(3), (k)(4),
(k)(5), (k)(6), and (k)(7).
(4) Reasons: Records are only exempt from pertinent provisions of 5
U.S.C. 552a to the extent such provisions have been identified and an
exemption claimed for the original record and the purposes underlying
the exemption for the original record still pertain to the record which
is now contained in this system of records. In general, the exemptions
were claimed in order to protect properly classified information
relating to national defense and foreign policy, to avoid interference
during the conduct of criminal, civil, or administrative actions or
investigations, to ensure protective services provided the President
and others are not compromised, to protect the identity of confidential
sources incident to Federal employment, military service, contract, and
security clearance determinations, to preserve the confidentiality and
integrity of Federal testing materials, and to safeguard evaluation
materials used for military promotions when furnished by a confidential
source. The exemption rule for the original records will identify the
specific reasons why the records are exempt from specific provisions of
5 U.S.C. 552a.
Dated: November 20, 2003.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 03-30396 Filed 12-8-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P