[Federal Register: June 2, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 106)]
[Notices]
[Page 31153-31154]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02jn04-99]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement: City and County of San Francisco,
CA
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) will be prepared for a project in San Francisco, California,
known as the Bayview Transportation Improvements Project.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leland Dong, North Region Team Leader,
Federal Highway Administration, 650 Capitol Mall Suite 4-100,
Sacramento, California 95814, Telephone: (916) 498-5860 or Bill Wycko,
San Francisco Planning Department, 1660 Mission Street, San Francisco,
California 94103, Telephone (415) 558-5972.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans), will prepare an EIS for
proposed improvements to the roadway system in the southeast sector of
San Francisco, California. The project is needed to provide an
alternate designated route for future truck traffic from US Highway 101
to the planned industrial portion of the redeveloped Hunters Point
Shipyard and minimize travel time to the planned industrial portion of
the Shipyard, as well as the existing industrial areas of the Bayview.
The study area is approximately bounded by Caesar Chavez Street to
the north, the City and County of San Francisco border to the south, US
Highway 101 to the west and San Francisco Bay to the east.
Seven build-alternatives have been identified. While these
alternative routes attempt to avoid residential streets, a few
residences can be found on some of the alternative alignments. Three of
the alternatives involve constructing a new bridge over the Yosemite
Slough or South Basin. Two alternatives use overland roadway routes
only. Two alternatives involve construction of significant roadway
structures. The roadway improvements required for each alignment vary.
The build-alternatives, length, and highway connections are:
1. Long Bridge, 2.27 miles: Exits Northbound US 101 at Harney Way.
2. Medium Bridge, 3.12 miles: Exits Northbound US 101 at Harney Way.
3. Griffith Bridge, 3.34 miles: Exits Northbound US 101 at Harney Way.
4. Griffith Armstrong, 3.84 miles: Exits Northbound US 101 at Harney
Way.
5. Carroll Avenue Overpass, 3.74 miles: Exits Northbound US 101 at
Third Street/Bayshore Boulevard.
6. 3rd Street/Egbert/Ingalls, 3.45 miles: Exits USA 101 at Third
Street/Bayshore Boulevard.
7. I-280 Islais Creek interchange, 6.28 miles: Exits I-280 at Evans
Avenue.
Other alternatives to be considered include no-build,
Transportation Systems Management (TSM) and mass transit. Although
seven build-alternatives have been identified for study, combinations
of the alignments may be considered. Modified versions of these
alternatives which address technical considerations, respond to
concerns from the public or reduce community impacts may be considered.
The project area is an economically and socially diverse
neighborhood. The predominant land use within the project area is
residential with a mix of heavy commercial, industrial and warehousing
activities. The project area is adjacent to San Francisco Bay, an
Essential Fish Habitat Area as designated by the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration--Fisheries.
Key environmental issues to be studied include, but are not limited
to, air quality, noise, traffic, socioeconomic impacts, business
relocations, hazardous materials, biological, water quality, coastal
zone, flood plain, wetlands, visual impacts, impacts to open space and
cultural resources and construction/encroachment on State and/or
Federal lands. Other key issues may arise at the scoping meeting or
during the environmental review process. Resources subject to section
106 of the National Historic Preservation Act may be affected. Section
4(f) resources may also be affected.
Letters describing the proposed action and soliciting comments will
be sent to appropriate Federal, State and local agencies, and to
private organizations and citizens who have previously expressed, or
are known to have an interest in, this proposal.
Two scoping meetings will be held on July 8, 2004 at 1 p.m. and 7
p.m. at the Bayview Opera House, 4705 Third Street between Oakdale
Avenue and Newcomb Avenue in San Francisco. The purpose of the scoping
meetings is to seek input and to collect ideas and concerns regarding
(1) the individual project concepts and (2) the environmental studies
to be done.
Public meetings and a public hearing will also be held. The draft
EIS will be available for public and agency review prior to the public
hearing. Public notice will be given as to the exact time and location
of the meetings and hearing.
To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed
action are addressed and all significant issues identified, comments
and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments or
questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be
directed to the FHWA at the address provided above.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)
[[Page 31154]]
Issued on: May 18, 2004.
Leland W. Dong,
Team Leader--North Region, Federal Highway Administration, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. 04-11706 Filed 6-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-M