Governmental Affairs Committee
Hearing on the
Relationship Between a Department of Homeland Security and the
Intelligence Community
Chairman
Joe Lieberman
June 26, 2002
Good morning
and welcome to our witnesses and to our guests. Today we hold
the second of four hearings designed to take a closer look at
the homeland security reorganization plan proposed by President
Bush and how best to merge it with legislation co-authored by
Senators Specter, Graham, and myself, and voted out of this
committee a little over a month ago.
As we
create this new Department of Homeland Security, one of our
priorities must be to address what clearly was the single
biggest security shortcoming of our government before September
11th: The highly unintelligent way our government
coordinated - or failed to coordinate - intelligence.
Suffice to
say that a few infamous memos and warnings, and the picture they
may have painted if they had been understood in relation to one
another and in a broader context, are now a painful part of
American history.
And so, our
challenge is to build a more intelligent intelligence system
that synthesizes and synchronizes information from the field,
then converts it, through analysis, into action that better
protects American security here at home.
Last week, the Committee heard from Governor Ridge on how the
administration’s plan would coordinate intelligence. Today, we
will hear from distinguished alumnae from the intelligence
community on their assessment of the best solution. And
tomorrow we will hear from FBI Director Mueller, Central
Intelligence Director Tenet, former FBI and CIA Director
William Webster, as well as the Chairman and ranking member of
the Senate Intelligence Committee, Senators Graham and Shelby.
Their expertise and candor will help us craft this legislation.
Our fourth
hearing on Friday will explore the President’s proposal to
address the problem of weapons of mass destruction, and the
relevant science, technology, and public health issues
associated with detecting, protecting against, and combating
these weapons.
With all
that in mind, clearly the part of this reorganization that has
drawn most public attention and thoughtful concern from members
of the Committee is how to bring the intelligence establishment
together with law enforcement to avoid the information breakdown
that appears to have occurred prior to September 11th.
The
president’s proposal to establish an intelligence analysis
clearing house within the new department is a step in the right
direction, although I think we still want to understand what was
intended and to see if there is a way to strengthen the
proposal.
Under the
President’s plan, as I understand it, the Department of Homeland
Security would provide competing analysis. But the FBI, the
CIA, and a handful of other intelligence agencies would still
have primary responsibility to uncover and prevent specific
threats or conspiracies against Americans. In other words, no
one office would be designated to pull the threads together.
Our
Committee proposal takes a different approach, which I don’t
argue is adequate to the threat at this point. Primarily at
Senator Graham’s urging, we established an anti-terrorism
coordinator in the White House with the statutory and budget
authority to pull all the various elements of the anti-terrorism
effort together. That would include not just the new Department
of Homeland Security but the intelligence community, law
enforcement, the State Department and the Defense Department, as
well.
In short,
the coordinator would be in a position to forge the kinds of
relationships that would be necessary to get the information
needed to connect the dots and have a chance to see a clear
picture.
Today, we
will hear other ideas. Several noted experts - Senator Rudman,
former CIA Director Woolsey, and others - have suggested the
creation of a Domestic Intelligence Agency along the lines of
Britain’s famed MI-5 - which works closely with Scotland Yard
and the foreign intelligence agency, MI-6 and reports to the
home secretary. Their view is that the FBI’s law enforcement
mission conflicts with intelligence-related tasks, and thus the
counter-terrorism functions of the FBI and CIA should be merged
into the new department. This domestic intelligence agency
approach, however, raises important civil liberties questions
that speak to our core democratic values. We must tackle these
questions head on.
Our
colleague from Pennsylvania, Senator Specter, has presented
another proposal that builds on the President’s plan. It would
create of a National Terrorism Assessment Center within the new
Department that would have the authority to direct the CIA, the
FBI and other intelligence agencies to provide it with all
information relating to terrorist threats. The center would
pull experienced intelligence analysts from across government to
analyze, synthesize and disseminate information to law
enforcement agencies.
We will hear
other ideas today from a superb group of witnesses. What struck
me last week at the first hearing we held with Governor Ridge
and Senators Hart and Rudman is the intense desire of members of
the Committee, across party lines, to figure out the best way to
get this job done. This is not only a moment of challenge but a
moment of opportunity and I think most of us haven’t yet found a
comfortable place to conclude our quest, particularly with
regard to intelligence and law enforcement coordination.
I look
forward to today’s testimony with confidence that this
distinguished panel of witnesses will help us in that effort. |