GAO REPORT ON FERC
Regulatory Agency Has Failed to Keep up with Changing Markets
Chairman Joe Lieberman
June 18, 2002
As Prepared for Delivery
Good morning. I’m glad to be here today with
Senator Carnahan. Ever since last year’s energy crisis in
California and other Western states, the Governmental Affairs
Committee has been keeping close watch over the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, the agency responsible for oversight of
America’s energy markets.
Part of FERC’s core responsibility is to
ensure that wholesale electricity and natural gas prices, in the
words of its statute, are "just and reasonable." In the past,
FERC did this by setting the rates electric and pipeline
companies could charge. Now, in deregulated markets, FERC
generally allows the energy companies to charge whatever the
market will bear, based on the premise that fair, competitive
markets will deliver fair, "just and reasonable" prices.
But FERC still retains the statutory
obligation to oversee these new markets to make sure that they
are, in fact, just and reasonable and that market participants
are not manipulating or abusing them. While FERC has been very
aggressive in transforming America’s energy markets from ones
based on FERC-determined rates to ones based on competitive
markets, the agency has failed to fulfill its obligation to
police the markets its created to make sure the participants are
acting fairly.
Today, Senator Carnahan and I are releasing a
General Accounting Office report which documents FERC’s
irresponsibility. In April 2001, Senator Carnahan and I asked
the GAO to investigate whether FERC was carrying out its
obligations to ensure that prices in wholesale electric and
natural gas markets were "just and reasonable." The report
concludes, as we suspected, that FERC is not adequately
upholding its responsibility to protect electricity consumers
from unjust and unreasonable rates.
For nearly a decade, FERC has recognized that
it needed to do a better job overseeing the deregulated markets
it was creating. Yet, despite multiple attempts and the
expenditure of millions and millions of dollars, FERC still
lacks that basic capability which means that our electricity and
natural gas markets are not only deregulated, they may also be
uncompetitive.
There is no more egregious example of what
happens when FERC doesn’t do its job than the energy crisis that
struck California and the Western United States in 2000 and
2001. We now know that Enron and other energy companies took
advantage of both an energy shortage and the absence of a FERC
cop on the beat, to force electricity consumers out West to pay
billions of dollars more than they should have paid. It is
unconscionable that – two years after the Western electricity
markets began to melt down and over seven months after Enron’s
collapse – FERC is just now uncovering these abuses such as
exporting power from California and then reselling that same
power back to the state at higher prices.
GAO calls the California energy crisis FERC’s
wake up call. I’d say the California energy crisis should not
only have woke FERC up - it should have grabbed the Commission
by the neck and shook it up. But, how many times did FERC hit
the snooze button before opening its eyes? It shouldn’t have
taken the nightmare of sky-high rates and rolling blackouts to
shake FERC out of its slumber. Aggressive oversight of emerging
energy markets should have gone hand-in-hand with the changes
that created the new deregulated markets - instead of being an
afterthought. And even if FERC is now awake, the GAO tells us
that the agency simply doesn’t have the capability to oversee
our energy markets properly.
The GAO reports that FERC lacks the skilled
personnel, the computer and software capability, the
organizational structure, and even the plans needed to monitor
energy trading and transmission activities to determine if
abuses are occurring. Attracting and keeping skilled employees
is a significant challenge throughout the Federal Government; in
this case that means individuals with detailed knowledge and
experience in how energy commodity markets operate. But the GAO
found that FERC never even requested some of the hiring and
retention authorities available to it to solve these problems -
authorities such as seeking approval from the Office of
Personnel Management to offer higher salaries to workers with
critical skills.
Furthermore, the GAO’s report recommends that
Congress take another look at FERC’s statutory authority to
oversee energy markets. The Senate version of the energy bill,
which is now in conference, would expand both civil and criminal
enforcement authority under the Federal Power Act. So the
Congress is already working to address this issue. Maybe more
needs to be done to strengthen FERC’s authority. We will be
providing a copy of this report to Senator Bingaman and to
Senator Murkowski – the Chairman and Ranking Member on the
Energy Committee, and consulting with the Committee about
possible changes.
To his credit, FERC Chairman Pat Wood agrees
with GAO that FERC’s past efforts have failed and that it needs
to try again, and try harder. In January, Wood announced that
FERC was initiating yet another reorganization of the agency and
the creation of yet another new market oversight office – the
Office of Market Oversight and Investigations. This one must
work. American consumers cannot afford another FERC failure.
Senator Carnahan and I will ask the GAO to monitor FERC’s
efforts to set up this new office and report back to us within a
year.
We are hopeful, but given the record of the
Commission, it’s hard to be optimistic. An affordable, reliable
supply of electricity and natural gas is too important to the
quality of life of the American people and to the quality of
health of our economy for us accept anything less than bold
reform. To restore consumers’ and investors’ badly-shaken
confidence in our energy markets, FERC must first restore their
confidence that our regulatory system is still out there
protecting them.
Thank you. Senator Carnahan? |