| | Energy Use |
| | Total (non-transportation) energy use |
| | All |
| | Energy reduction is a challenging objective in the manufacturing environment. To achieve this goal, KCD already has two projects underway that will achieve non-transportation energy reductions. First, KCD is replacing the ceramic media in one of the three regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) used on-site for air emissions abatement. Replacing this media will result in a decreased change in pressure (or delta P) across the bed, which will produce a noticeable decrease in the energy used to drive airflow by the main fan. The second major project involves combining a lithographic plate coating line and a finishing cut-to-length machine into a single unit. This second project will eliminate double handling of materials that are coated and then directly cut-to-length. In addition to these two projects currently underway, KCD process engineers will evaluate energy saving projects that have been previously identified against available budget constraints to determine the feasibility of further reductions. Some of the projects identified include:
1. HVAC changes in the finishing complex. This project will rearrange the configuration of certain elements involved in heating, cooling, and dehumidification.
2. Lighting improvements in the finishing complex. This project will replace certain lighting elements to reduce energy consumption.
3. Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Aeration/Mixer activity. This project will optimize the use of the aerators/mixers to reduce energy consumption yet provide the necessary performance in the treatment process.
Site Environmental personnel will be involved in tracking energy reductions against PTrack commitments and site management will be advised of current progress quarterly.
|
| | No
|
| | Yes |
| | |
| | Waste |
| | Non-hazardous waste generation |
| All measurements should represent the performance level for the indicator across the entire facility. For many indicators, however, you may choose to focus your commitment on a specific subset of the indicator, e.g. a specific material, a specific group of toxic air emissions, a particular waste component, a specific VOC, etc. | All |
| | |
| | KCD has made remarkable progress in reducing manufacturing waste and increasing the site landfill diversion rate. Prior to the divestiture, KCD achieved a landfill diversion rate of approximately 80%. Given the changes associated with the divestiture and the incorporation of Kodak Polychrome Graphics, it appears that the remaining KCD operations have also been achieving a diversion rate of approximately 80%. Following the divestiture, the contract with a third party recycler will be reviewed and renewed. KCD would like to drive this diversion rate above 80% by working with the recycler to review individual waste streams and evaluate the feasibility of recycling them. As new streams are identified for recycling, additional “shop-floor” training will take place to ensure that operators are aware of the changes in how those streams should be handled. Continuing manufacturing waste issues include the following:
1. Cores – Dense cardboard cores that end up in a compactor prove problematic in that compaction is not truly accomplished. KCD has been working to recycle these cores wherever possible, but cores with unused product wound on them cannot currently be recycled. This has been an ongoing issue and KCD will continue to work on an appropriate solution.
2. Off-spec Coated Product – Often on cores (as above) partial & full rolls of product that don’t meet quality standards currently have to be landfilled. Of course, the manufacturing goal is to reduce this stream but in the event that this material becomes waste a satisfactory recycling option needs to be available.
Site Environmental personnel will be involved in tracking waste reductions against PTrack commitments and site management will be advised of current progress quarterly.
|
| | No
|
| | Yes |
| | |
| | Alternate Commitment |
| | Currently, NPDES permitted dischargers are assigned permit limits at their discharge point(s) and very little information exists about the ambient water quality in the receiving water body. KCD and other dischargers to Segments 11,12, & 13 of the Cache la Poudre River have come together to form an ambient water quality-monitoring group. This group was formed in cooperation with the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE) to monitor the ambient water quality of the receiving water body. |
| | This is an important environmental issue because the ambient water quality of the river is the true measure of the effectiveness of established permit limits. This group will provide coordinated and accurate data about the water quality along 45 river miles year round, which will be available to members of the monitoring group, regulators, and the public. |
| | KCD will actively monitor and fund the associated biological studies for 2.5 of the 9 currently established river assessment locations (sites). Each of these sites will be sampled at least 4 times per year for water quality, at least twice a year for benthic analysis, and at least once a year for fish. The water quality parameters evaluated and the associated testing methods will be reviewed annually with CDPHE. All ambient water quality results obtained by the group will be provided to regulators and the public through an intermediate database that will subsequently upload the data to the EPA database STORET. |
| | The environmental benefits of this project will become evident as the water quality data is acquired and analyzed by the interested parties. State regulators will apply new or adjust existing effluent limitations in the event that the ambient water quality suggests that additional limitations are warranted. Beyond potential changes to discharger’s permits, the public will have access to the ambient water quality information as its obtained. |
| |
|
| | | |
Participant’s Agreement | June 30, 2007 | Solidify group relationship and ensure continuity of program | Annual commitment to acquire and publish ambient water quality data | Data Sharing Defined | August 31, 2007 | Program in-place to act as a repository for data accessible by dischargers, regulators, and the general public. | Ambient water quality data readily available. | Annual Participant’s Agreement Renewal | May 31, 2008 | Solidify group relationship and ensure continuity of the program. | Annual commitment to acquire and publish ambient water quality data | Annual Review of Water Quality Parameters with CDPHE | July 31, 2008 | Ensure that the data acquired is relevant to potential water quality concerns in the segments | Accurate and Relevant water quality data will be available | Annual Participant’s Agreement Renewal | May 31, 2009 | Solidify group relationship and ensure continuity of the program. | Annual commitment to acquire and publish ambient water quality data | Annual Review of Water Quality Parameters with CDPHE | July 31, 2009 | Ensure that the data acquired is relevant to potential water quality concerns in the segments | Accurate and Relevant water quality data will be available | | | | |
|
| | City of Fort Collins (Committed)
South Fort Collins Sanitation District (Committed)
Boxelder Sanitation District (Committed)
Town of Windsor Sanitation District (Committed)
City of Greeley Sanitation District (Committed)
North Front Range Water Quality Planning Association (Collaborator, 208 Committee Subgroup)
Colorado State University (Collaborator, Conduct Fish and Benthic studies at each of the sampling loctions)
Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment - Water Quality Control Division (Collaborator) |
Facility Identification Information
|
| (A RCRA number is used in the RCRAInfo database for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) programs). |
| Yes |
| COD078341658
|
| (A TRI number is used in the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) for Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). |
| Yes |
| 80551KDKCLCOUNT
|
| (An AFS number is used in the AIRS Facility Subsystem of the Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) for Clean Air Act programs). |
| Yes |
| 0812300003
|
| (A PCS/NPDES number is used in the Permit Compliance System (PCS) for Clean Water Act programs monitoring National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits). |
| Yes |
| CO0032158 – Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit, COG600373 – Minimal Discharge Permit, COR020116 - Heavy Industrial Storm Water Discharge Permit, COG380009 - Treated Water Discharge Permit
|
| (A FIFRA number is given to facilities regulated by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)). |
| Yes |
| 059441-CO-001
|
Air Characteristics
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| No
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| Yes
|
| Subpart TT - Metal Coil Surface Coating
|
| |
| No
|
| |
| Yes |
| Printing & Publishing MACT (Subpart KK), Paper & Other Webs Coating MACT (Subpart JJJJ), Boiler MACT (Subpart DDDDD), Metal Coil Coating MACT (Subpart SSSS), Miscellaneous Coatings Manufacturing MACT (Subpart HHHHH), Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing MACT (Subpart FFFF), Organic Liquids Distribution MACT (Subpart EEEE), Wood Furniture Surface Coating MACT (Subpart JJ)
|
| |
| Yes |
| As a permitted facility in a delegated state, Kodak Colorado Division is subject to all the requirements of the Colorado SIP.
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| No
|
| |
| Yes |
| All of them in so far as the Colorado SIP determines Title V and APEN requirements for criteria pollutants in terms of attainment / non-attainment status with respect to NAAQS. Kodak Colorado is located in an attainment area for all criteria pollutants.
|
| |
| n/a
|
Water Characteristics
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| No
|
| |
| No
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| Yes |
| Separate parts of the facility are subject to 40 CFR Subchapter N Part 459 - Photographic PSC, and Part 414 - Organic Chemicals, Plastics, and Synthetic Fibers
|
| |
| n/a
|
Hazardous Waste Characteristics
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| No
|
| |
| No
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| n/a
|
Environmental Clean-Up, Restoration, and Corrective Action Characteristics
|
| |
| No |
|
|
| |
| Yes |
| Action Memorandum PRP Lead Notification for Non-Time Critical Removal, September 25, 2000
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| No
|
| |
| n/a
|
Other Environmental Characteristics
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| No
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| n/a
|