Page Options
Media:
Contact Us
- 800–CDC–INFO
- (800-232-4636)
- 888–232–6348 (TTY)
- cdcinfo@cdc.gov
Rapid Diagnostic Testing for Influenza
Information for Clinical Laboratory Directors
On this page:
Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Influenza
The availability and use of commercial influenza rapid diagnostic tests by laboratories and clinics have substantially increased in recent years.
- Influenza rapid diagnostic tests are screening tests for influenza virus infection.
- They can provide results within 30 minutes.
- More than 10 rapid influenza tests have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (see Influenza Diagnostic Table).
- Rapid tests differ in some important respects:
- Some can identify influenza A and B viruses and distinguish between them.
- Some can identify influenza A and B viruses but cannot distinguish between them.
- Some tests are waived from requirements under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA).
- Most tests can be used with a variety of specimen types (see Influenza Diagnostic Table), but the accuracy of the tests can vary based on the type of specimen collected (for example throat swab versus nasal swab).
- FDA approval is based upon specific specimen types.
- The rapid tests vary in terms of sensitivity and specificity when compared with viral culture. Product insert information and research publications indicate that:
- Median sensitivities are approximately 70-75%
- Median specificities are approximately 90-95%
- Specimens to be used with rapid tests generally should be collected as close as is possible to the start of symptoms and usually no more than 4-5 days later in adults. In very young children, influenza viruses can be shed for longer periods; therefore, in some instances, testing for a few days after this period may still be useful.
Accuracy Depends Upon Prevalence
The positive and negative predictive values vary considerably depending upon the prevalence of influenza in the community.
- False-positive (and true-negative) influenza test results are more likely to occur when disease prevalence is low, which is generally at the beginning and end of the influenza season.
- False-negative (and true-positive) influenza test results are more likely to occur when disease prevalence is high, which is typically at the height of the influenza season.
Clinical Considerations of Testing When Influenza Prevalence is Low
When disease prevalence is relatively low, the positive predictive value (PPV) is low and false-positive test results are more likely. By contrast, when disease prevalence is low, the negative predictive value (NPV) is high, and negative results are more likely to be true.
| If Flu Prevalence is… | And Specificity is… | Then PPV is… | False Pos. rate is… |
|---|---|---|---|
| VERY LOW (2.5%) | POOR (80%) | V. POOR (6-12%) | V. HIGH (88-94%) |
| VERY LOW (2.5%) | GOOD (98%) | POOR (39-56%) | HIGH (44-61%) |
| MODERATE (20%) | POOR (80%) | POOR (38-56%) | HIGH (44-62%) |
| MODERATE (20%) | GOOD (98%) | GOOD (86-93%) | LOW (7-14%) |
The interpretation of positive results should take into account the clinical characteristics of the case. If an important clinical decision is affected by the test result, the rapid test result should be confirmed by another test, such as viral culture or polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Clinical Considerations of Testing When Influenza Prevalence Is High
When disease prevalence is relatively high, the NPV is low and false-negative test results are more likely. When disease prevalence is high, the PPV is high and positive results are more likely to be true.
| If Flu Prevalence is… | And Sensitivity is… | Then NPV is… | False Neg. rate is… |
|---|---|---|---|
| MODERATE (20%) | POOR (50%) | MODERATE (86-89%) | MODERATE (11-14%) |
| MODERATE (20%) | HIGH (90%) | V. GOOD (97-99%) | V. LOW (2-3%) |
| HIGH (40%) | POOR (50%) | MODERATE (70-75%) | MODERATE (25-30%) |
| HIGH (40%) | HIGH (90%) | V. GOOD (93-94%) | LOW (6-7%) |
The interpretation of negative results should take into account the clinical characteristics of the patient. If an important clinical decision is affected by the test result, then the rapid test result should be confirmed by another test, such as viral culture or PCR.
Selecting Tests
Many factors should be considered when selecting a test, including the following:
- Tests with high sensitivity and specificity will provide better positive and negative predictive values.
- Types of specimens that provide the most accurate results.
Information about these characteristics can be found in product inserts and scientific articles, and by contacting the manufacturer.
Changes in Recommended Procedures Can Affect Test Results
Modification by the user can affect test performances and increase false-positive and/or false-negative rates. Such modifications include
- Using specimens for which the test is not optimized
- Using swabs that did not come with the rapid test kits [unless recommended (see table)].
When Is Use of Rapid Diagnostic Tests Beneficial?
- Testing during an outbreak of acute respiratory disease can determine if influenza is the cause.
- During influenza season, testing of selected patients presenting with respiratory illnesses compatible with influenza can help establish whether influenza is present in a specific patient population and help health-care providers determine how to use their clinical judgment for diagnosing and treating respiratory illness. (Testing need not be done for all patients.)
- Otherwise, rapid tests do not address the public health need for influenza virus isolated that can only be obtained through the collection of specimens for viral culture. Influenza virus isolates are essential for determining the match between circulating influenza viruses and those viruses contained in the vaccine and for aiding in the selection of new vaccine strains.
Additional Information
- Page last updated September 18, 2008
