Home About ATSDR Press Room A-Z Index Glossary Employment Training Contact Us CDC  
ATSDR/DHHS Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Department of Health and Human Services ATSDR en Español

Search:

Toxic Substances and Health
 
Report Contents
 
Charge to the Panel
Panel Members
 
Fate & Biomonitoring
 
Sampling Methodologies
Health Endpoints
Susceptible Populations
Exposure Evaluation
Biomonitoring
 
Correlation of Data
 
Risk Management
 
Relocation Criteria
 
Reference Doses
 
Decontamination
 
Recommendations
 
Clinical Evaluation
 
Appropriate Triggers
Health Status
Environmental Medicine
 
Evaluation Protocol
 
Standardizing Lab Data
Treatment
Neurobehavioral Effects
Acute Poisoning
Suggested Evaluation
 
Overarching Issues
 
Recommendations
Field Survey
7-day Study
Dermal Absorption
Subchronic Toxicity
Pilot Study
Cohort Study
 
Selected References
 
Risk Communication
 
Workgroup
Recommendations
Operating Procedures
Management & Planning
Limitations of Strategies
Planning Steps
Identifying Populations
Preventing Exposures
Research Needs
Conclusions
 
Risk Documents
 
Cancer Policy
Risk Assessment
Communication Primer
Evaluation Primer
Psychologial Responses
 
ATSDR Resources
 
Case Studies (CSEM)
Exposure Pathways
GATHER (GIS)
HazDat Database
Health Assessments
Health Statements
Interaction Profiles
Interactive Learning
Managing Incidents
Medical Guidelines
Minimal Risk Levels
Priority List
ToxFAQs™
ToxFAQs™ CABS
Toxicological Profiles
Toxicology Curriculum
 
External Resources
 
CDC
eLCOSH
EPA
Healthfinder®
Medline Plus
NCEH
NIEHS
NIOSH
OSHA
 

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
Methyl Parathion Expert Panel Report
Health Education and Risk Communication Strategies


Identifying Exposed Populations

Similar questions to the nine posed above should shape the strategy for identifying exposed populations.

The agency representatives who provided information to this panel have expressed a concern that the cases identified are merely the "tip of the iceberg." This possibility should not deter the agencies involved from continuing or expanding efforts to identify other populations that have been exposed. We believe that before these identification efforts, agencies need to devise a standard protocol to deal with newly exposed individuals and new areas of contamination. This protocol should then be communicated effectively to the newly identified populations so that follow-up expectations from the community can be met.

Impact of media campaigns

It is not known whether the media campaign used thus far has reached the populations at risk or what message they have received and understood. Therefore, there is a need to assess what the people who have been reached from the campaign already implemented have understood from the information, what they expect will be done in their cases, and what other general expectations they have regarding the agency's responsibilities. To address these questions within the exposed population that have already been identified, it is recommended that the agencies take an individualized approach to case management. (See section on communicating with exposed populations.)

Impact on rural populations

There is a concern that rural populations are not being reached by the bulletins being issued for the identification of possibly exposed individuals. There is a need to assess whether the populations at risk are being reached effectively. This can be done by direct sampling (such as telephone interviews) of the target populations to assess awareness of the campaign.

Top of Page