Home About ATSDR Press Room A-Z Index Glossary Employment Training Contact Us CDC  
ATSDR/DHHS Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Department of Health and Human Services ATSDR en Español

Search:

Toxic Substances and Health
 
Primer Contents
En español
 
Preface
About the Primer
 
Principles & Techniques
 
Why Evaluate?
Types of Evaluation
Evaluation Design
Measure of Effectiveness
Barriers to Evaluation
 
Evaluation & Research
 
Review and Pretesting
Pretest Methods
Print Materials
Sample Survey
Group Case Study
Pretest Results
Using Pretest Results
Special Populations
Risk Message Checklist
 
Outcomes & Impacts
 
Assessment Questions
Evaluation Options
Midcourse Reviews
Have We Succeeded?
Evaluation Case Example
Evaluation Action Plan
Effective Program
 
Selected References
 
Risk Documents
 
Cancer Policy
Risk Assessment
Communication Primer
Methyl Parathion
Psychologial Responses
 
ATSDR Resources
 
Case Studies (CSEM)
Exposure Pathways
GATHER (GIS)
HazDat Database
Health Assessments
Health Statements
Interaction Profiles
Interactive Learning
Managing Incidents
Medical Guidelines
Minimal Risk Levels
Priority List
ToxFAQs™
ToxFAQs™ CABS
Toxicological Profiles
Toxicology Curriculum
 
External Resources
 
CDC
eLCOSH
EPA
Healthfinder®
Medline Plus
NCEH
NIEHS
NIOSH
OSHA
 

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
Evaluation Primer on Health Risk Communication Programs

Designing and Testing the Message


(AED, JHU, and PN 1993)

A crucial step in creating and assessing the effectiveness of health risk communication activities is determining what message ideas or concepts have the best chance of "connecting" with the target audience and influencing them to change behavior if behavior change is the stated objective. This process begins with using formative research and evaluation, a combination of techniques designed to help develop effective messages.

Literature reviews, in-depth interviews, and focus groups are examples of formative research tools that can be used to help determine if one concept is more salient to an audience segment than another, and which concepts should eventually be developed into specific messages. The general approach to pretesting concepts is to share them with members of the target audience and gauge their reactions.

Pretesting is conducted while materials are in draft form, to allow changes to be made without great expense if testing reveals ways to improve the messages or materials. Methods of pretesting include intercept interviews with members of the target audience and focus groups. Pretesting helps determine whether the messages and formats are appropriate, understandable, clear, attention-getting, credible, relevant, and have the desired effect (e.g., to raise awareness about an issue).

[Top of Page]