USDA Forest ServiceSkip navigational links

   

 

 

Invasive Plant Environmental Impact Statement

 

Background and Scoping


 

Until recently, invasive plant management was not addressed as a separate subject in our regional planning documents.  Invasive plants were discussed in general terms within management plans addressing broader vegetation management issues.  Following is a synopsis of this management history.

What is the history of vegetation management direction in the Pacific Northwest?

On June 2, 1981 the Forest Service issued a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and Record of Decision (ROD) on the “Methods of Managing Competing Vegetation”.  Analysis for that FEIS considered all vegetation management activities, excluding only tree harvest and tree nursery operations.  The management decision was to implement “full use of all methods of vegetation management, with reduced use of chemicals”.

A lawsuit was filed against the FEIS in US District Court of Oregon on July 13, 1983.  The lawsuit was filed by the Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides (NCAP), the Oregon Environmental Council, and the Audubon Society of Portland against the Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and the Environmental Protection Agency.  Oregonians for Food and Shelter, an organization representing the business community, were intervenors on behalf of the government agencies.

A judgment was entered on March 14, 1984, finding that, “The defend[a]nts have not prepared an adequate Worst Case Analysis, pursuant to their NEPA obligations.”  An injunction against the use of herbicides in the Pacific Northwest Region of the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management Districts in the State of Oregon was issued, to be in effect until the agency obligations were fulfilled.

Responding to the Court’s directive, the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management prepared a comprehensive human health risk assessment for the use of herbicides, including a worst-case analysis.  This was intended to be part of a supplement to the 1981 FEIS.  After the preparation of the risk assessment, the Forest Service determined that a new EIS on the vegetation management program in the Pacific Northwest was needed.  Work on a new EIS began in July of 1986.

In December 1988 the Pacific Northwest Region of the Forest Service issued a new Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and accompanying Record of Decision (ROD) titled  Managing Competing and Unwanted Vegetation”. The purpose of those documents was to identify methods of managing competing and unwanted vegetation within the forest environment and to select a preferred alternative.  Competing and unwanted vegetation occur in all ecological systems.  Unwanted vegetation may include logging slash, roadside brush, or plants that compete for nutrients and sunlight with more desirable species.  In respect to the EIS, most of the emphasis was focused on treatment of unwanted vegetation within forest plantations following regeneration harvests and plantings.  Invasive plants were addressed in the document, but only in a limited manner.

Following release of the FEIS and ROD, the defendants asked the court to dissolve its previous order enjoining the Secretary of Agriculture from using herbicides within the Pacific Northwest Region of the Forest Service.  Oregonians for Food and Shelter subsequently joined in the motion.  After a status conference by telephone, plaintiffs filed a statement of opposition to lifting the court ordered injunction.  Paul Merrell filed a motion to intervene, as he had an interest in the matter stemming from a previous lawsuit (Merrell v. Block).  Thereafter the parties, plus Mr. Merrell engaged in court-approved and arranged mediation.  They succeeded.  Their outcome was a written agreement (Mediated Agreement) detailing resolution on several points, including several compliance details on the part of the Forest Service.  District Court Judge James M. Burns signed the Mediated Agreement on May 8, 1989.  The court ordered injunction prohibiting Forest Service use of herbicides was lifted.

Why do you need new management direction?

The 1988 Vegetation Management EIS and Record of Decision, and the 1989 Mediated Agreement focused on competing vegetation in forest plantations. The ROD identifies prevention as the preferred strategy for vegetation management, and provides direction for analyzing prevention strategies for projects.  However, neither the ROD, nor the Mediated Agreement, thoroughly addressed the numerous issues specific to prevention and treatment of invasive plants, nor do they identify standards or practices that could be applied to prevent invasive plants from becoming established.

The 1988 ROD specified and specifically limited the type and range of tools available for the treatment of competing and unwanted vegetation.  Neither the ROD nor the Mediated Agreement provides a mechanism for adapting its requirements and adopting new technologies.  The use of biological agents and prescribed fire as control mechanisms were not fully examined.  Herbicides approved for use in the ROD were developed before 1980.  Today, new herbicides are available that appear to be more effective on target plants, and potentially less hazardous to humans and wildlife.

Given the seriousness of the current invasive species situation, National Forest managers need more operational flexibility with reduced process, greater cost-effectiveness and timely responsiveness, without increasing environmental risks.  A new roadmap for prevention and site restoration, as well as a new and expanded toolbox, including; biological, fire, mechanical, manual, cultural, and chemical tools, are critical to successfully managing our invasive plant problem.  New Forest Plan standards and guidelines will significantly enhance our ability to deal effectively with this threat to the integrity and productivity of the National Forests in the Pacific Northwest Region

What is the situation with invasive plants at this time?

Approximately 400,000 acres of National Forests and Grasslands are degraded in the Pacific Northwest Region by infestations of invasive, non-native plants.  This infestation has a high potential to expand and further degrade forest and grasslands.  Invasive plants spread across landscapes, unimpeded by ownership boundaries.  Infested areas represent potential seed sources for continuation of the invasion on neighboring lands. Infestations can be eliminated, controlled or exacerbated through utilization of specific management practices.  Invasive species create a host of environmental and other effects, most of which are harmful to native ecosystem biodiversity and processes, including:

§         Displacement of native plants

§         Reduction in functionality of habitat and forage for wildlife and livestock

§         Threats to populations of threatened, endangered and sensitive species

§         Alteration of physical and biological properties of soil, including productivity

§         Changes to the intensity and frequency of fires

§         High monetary cost of controlling/managing invasive plants

§         Loss of recreational opportunities

What is the state of current management direction?

Current regional management direction addressing invasive plant prevention, early detection, treatment, inventory and monitoring, and subsequent site restoration needs to be expanded and clarified. There is a critical need for the development of clear, and comprehensive Forest Plan standards and guidelines that allow more timely and more effective management and prevention practices for projects and programs in the Pacific Northwest Region.  Current noxious weed/invasive plant strategy can be found at the attached links.

Forest Service Noxious Weed Strategy

Forest Service Strategy for Noxious Weeds and Non Native Invasive Plants

Pacific Northwest Noxious Weed Strategy

Executive Order 13112 Invasive Species (Feb. 1999) provides direction that Federal agencies shall: (1) prevent the introduction of invasive species; (2) detect and respond rapidly to and control populations of such species in a cost-effective and environmentally sound manner;  (3) monitor invasive species populations accurately and reliably;  (4) provide for restoration of native species and habitat conditions in ecosystems that have been invaded.  This EIS and subsequent site-specific NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) analysis will implement this Executive Order.  See the attached link for Executive Order 13112.

Executive Order 13112 - Invasive Species

 

 

 

 

Disclaimers | Privacy Policy

 Last Modified: 01/14/04