[Code of Federal Regulations] [Title 48, Volume 1] [Revised as of October 1, 2002] From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access [CITE: 48CFR15.403-1] [Page 259-260] TITLE 48--FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM CHAPTER 1--FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION PART 15--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION--Table of Contents Subpart 15.4--Contract Pricing Sec. 15.403-1 Prohibition on obtaining cost or pricing data (10 U.S.C. 2306a and 41 U.S.C. 254b). (a) Cost or pricing data shall not be obtained for acquisitions at or below the simplified acquisition threshold. (b) Exceptions to cost or pricing data requirements. The contracting officer shall not require submission of cost or pricing data to support any action (contracts, subcontracts, or modifications) (but may require information other than cost or pricing data to support a determination of price reasonableness or cost realism)-- (1) When the contracting officer determines that prices agreed upon are based on adequate price competition (see standards in paragraph (c)(1) of this subsection); (2) When the contracting officer determines that prices agreed upon are based on prices set by law or regulation (see standards in paragraph (c)(2) of this subsection); (3) When a commercial item is being acquired (see standards in paragraph (c)(3) of this subsection); (4) When a waiver has been granted (see standards in paragraph (c)(4) of this subsection); or (5) When modifying a contract or subcontract for commercial items (see standards in paragraph (c)(3) of this subsection). (c) Standards for exceptions from cost or pricing data requirements- -(1) Adequate price competition. A price is based on adequate price competition if-- (i) Two or more responsible offerors, competing independently, submit priced offers that satisfy the Government's expressed requirement and if-- (A) Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal represents the best value (see 2.101) where price is a substantial factor in source selection; and (B) There is no finding that the price of the otherwise successful offeror is unreasonable. Any finding that the [[Page 260]] price is unreasonable must be supported by a statement of the facts and approved at a level above the contracting officer; (ii) There was a reasonable expectation, based on market research or other assessment, that two or more responsible offerors, competing independently, would submit priced offers in response to the solicitation's expressed requirement, even though only one offer is received from a responsible offeror and if-- (A) Based on the offer received, the contracting officer can reasonably conclude that the offer was submitted with the expectation of competition, e.g., circumstances indicate that-- (1) The offeror believed that at least one other offeror was capable of submitting a meaningful offer; and (2) The offeror had no reason to believe that other potential offerors did not intend to submit an offer; and (B) The determination that the proposed price is based on adequate price competition, is reasonable, and is approved at a level above the contracting officer; or (iii) Price analysis clearly demonstrates that the proposed price is reasonable in comparison with current or recent prices for the same or similar items, adjusted to reflect changes in market conditions, economic conditions, quantities, or terms and conditions under contracts that resulted from adequate price competition. (2) Prices set by law or regulation. Pronouncements in the form of periodic rulings, reviews, or similar actions of a governmental body, or embodied in the laws, are sufficient to set a price. (3) Commercial items. Any acquisition for an item that meets the commercial item definition in 2.101, or any modification, as defined in paragraph (3)(i) or (ii) of that definition, that does not change the item from a commercial item to a noncommercial item, is exempt from the requirement for cost or pricing data. If the contracting officer determines that an item claimed to be commercial is, in fact, not commercial and that no other exception or waiver applies, the contracting officer must require submission of cost or pricing data. (4) Waivers. The head of the contracting activity (HCA) may, without power of delegation, waive the requirement for submission of cost or pricing data in exceptional cases. The authorization for the waiver and the supporting rationale shall be in writing. The HCA may consider waiving the requirement if the price can be determined to be fair and reasonable without submission of cost or pricing data. For example, if cost or pricing data were furnished on previous production buys and the contracting officer determines such data are sufficient, when combined with updated information, a waiver may be granted. If the HCA has waived the requirement for submission of cost or pricing data, the contractor or higher-tier subcontractor to whom the waiver relates shall be considered as having been required to provide cost or pricing data. Consequently, award of any lower-tier subcontract expected to exceed the cost or pricing data threshold requires the submission of cost or pricing data unless-- (i) An exception otherwise applies to the subcontract; or (ii) The waiver specifically includes the subcontract and the rationale supporting the waiver for that subcontract. [62 FR 51230, Sept. 30, 1997, as amended at 64 FR 10545, Mar. 4, 1999; 64 FR 51836, Sept. 24, 1999; 66 FR 2129, Jan. 10, 2001]