Home > Nuclear > Tennessee Nuclear

Tennessee Nuclear Industry
                                         
Report Updated: August 18, 2006

Nuclear Power Plants in Tennessee Net Generation and Capacity, 2005
Plant Name/
Total Reactors
Capacity Net
MW(e)
Net Generation
Million kwh
Share of
Tennessee Nuclear Generation
(percent)
Operator/Owner
Sequoyah
Unit 1, Unit 2
2,227
18,999
68.3
Tennessee Valley Authority/Same
Watts Bar
Unit 1
1,121
8,804
31.7
Tennessee Valley Authority/Same
Total 2 Plants,
3 Reactors
3,348
27,803
100
 
Source: . Form EIA-860, "Annual Electric Generator Report," and Form EIA-906, "Power Plant Report."

According to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the two reactors at the Sequoyah plant are pressurized light water reactors (PWR). A second reactor planned for the Watts Bar plant is listed in appendix B, "Cancelled U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors," of the NRC Information Digest, with the notation that (as of the publication date) the reactor has not been formally cancelled. Watts Bar I is also a PWR.

Permanently Shutdown Commercial Reactors: Not applicable. As noted, there is one cancelled reactor: Watts Bar II.

Nuclear Research and Test Reactors Regulated by NRC: Not applicable.

Nuclear Power Generation in Tennessee, 1980 through 2005
Million kilowatthours
Sources: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-906, Power Plant Report, and predecessor forms.

Nuclear Generation

Electricity generation by nuclear power plants is available for each reactor and each State for each of the following years:

Contribution of Nuclear Power

As of January 1, 2005, Tennessee ranked 15th among the 31 States with nuclear capacity.

Electricity Market in Tennessee
(Percent Generated by Fuel)
Year Coal Natural
Gas
Hydro Nuclear Other
2004
60
*
11
29
*
2003
60
*
12
26
2
2002
62
1
8
29
*
*Less than one percent.
Source: EIA-906, "Power Plant Report."

A quick glance at the U.S. coal reserves map reveals coal fields nearly encircling Tennessee.  Kentucky's coal data are split by EIA into two regions: western and eastern Kentucky.  Tennessee’s electric utilities imported 3.1 million short tons of coal from western Kentucky, the largest market for western Kentucky mines outside Kentucky itself. Combined with 2.5 million short tons from eastern Kentucky, 6.9 million short tons from Colorado and Wyoming, 3 million short tons from Illinois, and sundry amounts from various States, the total distribution to Tennessee power plants is 19 million short tons of coal.

Tennessee also uses hydroelectric power. During the Depression, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) began harnessing the power of mighty rivers in one of the Nation's greatest engineering feats. By 1942, TVA had 12 hydroelectric projects and a steam plant under construction simultaneously.

Tennessee’s three nuclear reactors provide nearly triple the power of all the dams in the State. 

Tennessee Nuclear Highlights

  • In January 1943, General Leslie R. Groves persuades DuPont Company to build the pilot facilities at X-10 in Oak Ridge for the Manhattan Project, and eventually the reactors at Hanford, Washington. (The X-10 facility was to supply plutonium for the atom bomb.) The contract stipulated that DuPont would receive no payment other than costs plus $1 profit. (General Groves later reported that DuPont received only 66 cents in profit because the project was finished ahead of schedule). {Excerpted from Oak Ridge National Laboratory web site}
  • On May 27, 1996, Watts Bar 1 began commercial operation. As of this publication, it remains the last new reactor to go on line in the United States.
  • According to TVA, in September 2000, Watts Bar 1 operated continuously for 512 days, eclipsing the record of 468 days set at Sequoyah 1 in February of the same year.

The Computer and Nuclear Power

ORNL's work helped industry produce semiconductor
chips for computers economically.

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in Tennessee, a pioneer in atomic research, is also a pioneer in developing information and technology for the semiconductor industry (see photo). The two roles are not unrelated. "In the 1960's, using the Bulk Shielding Reactor, John Cleland and other ORNL scientists devised a neutral transmutation doping (NTD) method for uniformly distributing phosphorous ions in silicon."[1] NTD silicon is used in electronic components.

Although a 1991 World Technology (WTEC) study revealed that "all European countries that operate nuclear power plants, as well as Canada, Japan, and the U.S., are moving toward the use of digital computers.,"[2] it was probably not until the Y2K that the public developed a sense of their impact and potential impact. The WTEC study concluded that, at that time, U.S. nuclear plants were lagging behind other countries in using digital systems, although "the hardware for digital systems comes mostly from U.S. computer companies."[3]

But if there was a "computer gap," it appears to have closed as U.S. plants come to increasingly rely on them. Vermont Yankee used a computer model to analyze the impact of its 20 percent uprate of capacity, incorporating new data as the changes were being implemented. A student at the University of Wisconsin, College of Engineering, developed a model to study Kewaunee's cooling system. But the computer's relationship to nuclear power extends far beyond the perimeters of its nuclear power plants. Computers play an essential role in monitoring nuclear stockpiles.

License Renewal

All Tennessee reactors are fairly new, and no renewal applications are currently on file.  The first license to expire will be for Sequoyah 1 in September 2020.    To learn the current status of license applications for other U.S. reactors, consult the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) web site.

Air Quality in Tennessee

Of the 50 States plus the District of Columbia, the electric industry of the State of Tennessee ranked 15th highest in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in 2004. The State’s electric industry ranks 13th  highest in sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions and 14th  highest in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions.
Tennessee Airborne Emissions, Electricity Sector, 1990-2004
Metric Tons
Year Carbon Dioxide
CO2
Sulfur Dioxide
SO2
Nitrogen Oxides
NOX
1990 52,387,071 763,794 238,960
1991 49,837,278 726,663 221,711
1992 52,284,359 768,960 227,860
1993 60,592,010 816,030 264,565
1994 54,640,936 775,207 230,582
1995 58,678,739 499,714 242,599
1996 57,821,929 518,983 254,621
1997 60,531,990 501,302 271,540
1998 59,371,498 438,951 227,174
1999 58,748,956 447,194 185,191
2000 63,311,260 435,780 159,730
2001 60,971,644 379,114 164,995
2002 59,112,908 329,924 153,818
2003 55,820,373 344,471 129,206
2004 58,491,040 317,780 105,170
Source: EIA-767 and EIA-906 Survey, Energy Information Administration

Tennessee Airborne Emissions,
Electricity Sector, 1990-2004 (CO2)*
*Carbon Dioxide

Tennessee Airborne Emissions,
Electricity Sector, 1990-2004 (SO2)*
*Sulfur Dioxide

Tennessee Airborne Emissions,
Electricity Sector, 1990-2004 (NOX)*
*Nitrogen Oxide

More Information on Tennessee and Nuclear Power

University of Tennessee Nuclear Engineering Department. The Department will celebrate its 50th anniversary in 2007.



_______________________________________________
[1]"SemiConductors: Shaping the Digital Future," on line http://www.ornl.gov , Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee.
[2]"European Nuclear Instrumentation and Controls," Panel Discussion co-chaired by James D. White, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and David D. Lanning, MIT, published by World Technology (WTEC) Division of Loyola College, December 1991.
[3]Ibid.






Contact:



U.S. Nuclear Power Plants by Tennessee Plants
Alabama Browns Ferry
  Farley (Joseph M. Farley)
Arizona Palo Verde
Arkansas Arkansas Nuclear One
California Diablo Canyon
  San Onofre
Connecticut Millstone
Florida Crystal River 3
  St Lucie
  Turkey Point
Georgia Hatch (Edwin I. Hatch)
  Vogtle
Illinois Braidwood
  Byron
  Clinton
  Dresden
  LaSalle County
  Quad Cities
Iowa Duane Arnold
Kansas Wolf Creek
Louisiana River Bend
  Waterford
Maryland CalvertCliff
Massachusetts Pilgrim
Michigan Donald C. Cook
  Enrico Fermi (Fermi)
  Palisades
Minnesota Monticello
  Prairie Island
Mississippi Grand Gulf
Missouri Callaway
Nebraska Cooper
  Fort Calhoun
New Hampshire Seabrook
New Jersey Hope Creek
  Oyster Creek
  Salem Creek
New York Fitzpatrick (James A. Fitzpatrick)
  Indian Point
  Nile Mile Point
  R.E. Ginna (Ginna, or Robert E. Ginna)
North Carolina Brunswick
  McGuire
  Shearon-Harris(Harris)
Ohio Davis-Besse
  Perry
Pennsylvania Beaver Valley
  Limerick
  Peach Bottom
  Susquehanna
  Three Mile Island
South Carolina Catawba
  H.B. Robinson
  Oconee
  Virgil C. Summer (Summer)
Tennessee Sequoyah
  Watts Bar
Texas Comanche Peak
  South Texas
Vermont Vermont Yankee
Virginia North Anna
  Surry
Washington Columbia Generating Station
Wisconsin Kewaunee
  Point Beach


see also:
annual nuclear statistics back to 1953
projected electricity capacity to 2025
international electricity statistics