King County Navigation Bar (text navigation at bottom)
 
DANIEL T. SATTERBERG
King County Prosecuting Attorney


Juvenile Court Terms

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

Arraignment
A hearing at which an offender is formally notified of his or her charge(s). This is the point at which the offender enters his or her first plea (almost always “not guilty” at this early stage of the proceedings), and the hearing is the initial trigger for the beginning of the “speedy trial” calculation.

Capacity
A mandatory hearing for a respondent under the age of 12. The State must show that the respondent had the “capacity” to understand that his or her actions were wrong before the child can be arraigned.

Case Setting
In King County Juvenile Court, the hearing that follows arraignment, where a respondent usually decides to plead guilty, choose an alternative program or disposition (e.g., enter drug court or petition the court for a deferred disposition), or set the matter for a fact finding. This first case setting hearing usually occurs one to two weeks after arraignment.

Chemical Dependency Disposition Alternative or CDDA
A sentencing mechanism under RCW 13.40.165* whereby the court can suspend detention time and place a juvenile offender in an intense program to address drug or alcohol abuse problems.

Top of Page ^

Decline
When a juvenile is removed from Juvenile Court and tried as an adult. Depending on the seriousness of the charge and the juvenile’s age, this is either “automatic” or done after a court hearing. When the decision is within the discretion of the trial court, the court makes its conclusion, in part, by considering the eight “Kent Factors” (see below).

Deferred Disposition
A “deferred disposition” is a one-time sentencing alternative available to juveniles. The juvenile must plead guilty to an offense or stipulate to the police reports and allow the court to enter a finding of guilt. The court will then impose a period of probation and obligations for the respondent to fulfill. If the respondent successfully completes all the obligations imposed by the court by the end of probation, the court will withdraw the finding of guilty and dismiss the case. If the respondent fails to complete the conditions or violates the conditions that the court has imposed, the court can revoke the deferred disposition and immediately sentence the respondent. A juvenile is not eligible for a deferred disposition alternative if he or she has two prior “adjudications” (i.e., juvenile convictions) on his or her record, or if the offense with which the juvenile is charged is a sex offense or violent offense. The statute controlling deferred dispositions is found at RCW 13.40.127*.

Disposition
The juvenile equivalent of adult “sentencing” or a sentencing hearing. A disposition order is the court document that sets forth the sentencing conditions. The standard range for juvenile dispositions can be found in the Juvenile Justice Act at RCW 13.40.0357*.

Diversion
An opportunity for a respondent with little or no criminal history to appear before a community committee rather than have his or her case filed in juvenile court. Successfully completed diversions result in charges being dismissed. Failed diversions are returned to the prosecutor and the charges are filed in court.

Drug Court
An intensive program for juvenile offenders with substance abuse problems that keeps them accountable to the court for an extended period of time while they attempt to overcome substance abuse. If a juvenile offender successfully completes the program, the charge is dismissed. A similar program in King County has been established for adults, and more information on the adult program can be found at http://www.metrokc.gov/kcscc/drugcourt/.

Top of Page ^

Fact Finding
The term for a juvenile trial under the Juvenile Justice Act. This proceeding is also referred to as an “adjudicatory hearing” because it is the time when a juvenile’s case is decided or “adjudicated.” Unlike an adult criminal trial, a juvenile fact finding takes place in a fairly small court without a jury. The judge is the “trier of fact” and rules not only on legal issues, but also makes the ultimate decision on guilt. As in an adult trial, parties at the juvenile fact finding may make opening statements and closing arguments, the parties may call witnesses to testify, and the parties may offer exhibits. As with an adult defendant, a juvenile respondent is presumed innocent and may choose not to testify. The State bears the burden of proof at a juvenile fact finding—just as with an adult trial—and the prosecutor must prove all the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

First Appearance Hearing
The hearing within 48 hours of a juvenile’s arrest at which time the court will determine whether probable cause exists for the juvenile to be held in custody. This is also called the “investigation” or “probable cause” hearing. If a juvenile is held in custody, charges must be filed within 72 hours or the juvenile is released. If the youth is held in custody and charges are, in fact, filed, the youth will be arraigned shortly after the expiration of the 72 hours.

Insufficient Finding
A case returned by the prosecuting attorney to the referring police agency because it has been found insufficient for the filing of a charge in court. This may be because of legal or factual challenges that cannot be overcome, missing witnesses, because the offense is best handled through school disciplinary matters, or simply because the person has turned 18 and must now be filed on as an adult. An adult case that is not filed is called a “decline”—however, in juvenile court the term “decline” has a different meaning (see above), and thus the term “insufficient” is used.

JJA
Abbreviation commonly used for the Juvenile Justice Act, found in RCW 13.40.*

JRA
The Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration*, part of the Washington Department of Social and Health Services. JRA is responsible for long-term juvenile commitment beyond “local sanctions.” The difference between “detention” in a local juvenile facility and a commitment to JRA would be similar to the difference between the King County Jail and a prison commitment for an adult. Echo Glenn and Greenhill would be examples of JRA facilities.

Juvenile Probation Counselor or JPC
Juvenile Probation Counselors, or JPC’s, work for the King County Superior Court and supervise youth who are charged with, or who have been found guilty of, an offense. Unlike with adult offenders, JPC’s enter the process while charges are still pending. The juvenile will likely have one JPC while charges are pending and a different JPC after his or her conviction.

Juvie
Slang term for the Juvenile Department of the King County Superior Court or the Juvenile Division of the King County Prosecutor’s Office. It’s also used to refer to the Youth Service Center or the King County Juvenile Detention Center on 12th Avenue and Alder Street in Seattle.

Top of Page ^

Kent Factors
The eight guiding factors a court weighs during a decline hearing to determine whether a respondent should be tried as a juvenile or an adult (from the United States Supreme Court case of Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541, 17 L.Ed.2d 84, 86 S.Ct. 1045 (1966)). These factors include (1) the seriousness of the alleged offense and the need to protect the community; (2) whether the alleged offense was committed in an aggressive, violent, premeditated or willful manner; (3) whether the alleged offense was against persons or against property; (4) the prosecutive merit of the complaint; (5) whether there are adult co-defendants that should be tried with the juvenile in a single proceeding; (6) the sophistication and maturity of the juvenile; (7) the record and previous criminal history of the juvenile; and (8) the prospects for adequate protection of the public and the likelihood of reasonable rehabilitation of the juvenile by the use of procedures, services and facilities currently available to the Juvenile Court.

Local Sanction Offense
An offense for which the standard sentencing range--based on the seriousness of the crime and the juvenile’s criminal history—is no greater than a commitment to the local detention facility for 30 days. When a juvenile offense is a local sanction offense, the court can impose a disposition anywhere within a range on four different categories: community supervision, or probation (0-12 months); community service hours (0-150 hours); a monetary fine (0-$500); and/or detention (0-30 days). “Detention” can mean secured detention in the local juvenile facility, or may mean an alternative to secured detention (ASD), such as work crew, day reporting, electronic home monitoring, etc. A disposition over 30 days would require a commitment to the Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration (JRA), and places the respondent under the authority of the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS).

Manifest Injustice
A disposition above or below the standard sentencing range for the offense as established by the Legislature. To impose such a sentence, the court must find from the record that substantial and compelling reasons support the conclusion that the standard range would effect a “manifest injustice,” i.e., that the standard range would be too harsh or too lenient in the context of all the circumstances.

Mental Health Disposition Alternative or MHDA
A disposition alternative under RCW 13.40.167*that allows the court to suspend the sentence for juveniles who have a qualifying dual diagnosis that involves both mental health and substance abuse issues. In King County, this disposition is sometimes part of “treatment court” (see below).

M.I.
These initials are used in two different ways: when a referral is first reviewed by a prosecutor, the case is sometimes returned to the referring police agency for “more information.” When used in a disposition context, “M.I.” also can mean a “manifest injustice” sentence above or below the standard range for the offense (see above).

Top of Page ^

Respondent
The term for a juvenile charged with an offense under the Juvenile Justice Act. Similar to the adult term “defendant.”

School Police Officer
A School Police Officer is an employee of the school district, but has been commissioned by the local authority with the power of arrest and other authorities similar to a commissioned law enforcement officer. School Police typically have law enforcement academy training. For purposes of search and seizure they are considered school employees; during custodial interrogation, however, School Police Officers should provide Miranda warnings. While this security model is popular in many large school districts around the nation, only one district in the State of Washington employs School Police Officers (the Auburn School District).

School Resource Officer or SRO (also School Liaison Officer)
A School Resource Officer, or SRO, is a law enforcement officer from a local department who is assigned full-time or part-time to work at a specific school or schools. Some SRO’s also participate in school staff functions, such as teaching classes or helping to formulate individual education plans.

School Security Officer or SSO
A School Security Officer, or SSO, is an employee of the school or school district, and is considered a school official for purposes of search and seizure. The School Security Officer is not usually a commissioned law enforcement officer. The training and qualifications for a School Security Officer vary greatly from district to district and range from individuals who have no security background and little formal training to districts that require law enforcement academy training and require their security officers to carry firearms.

Speedy Trial
The time period during which an offender must be brought to trial by the State. While “speedy trial” is a constitutional right, that precise time period is not defined in the Constitution and varies from state to state. For juvenile offenders in Washington, the speedy trial for an offender in custody is 30 days after arraignment; for a juvenile offender out of custody, the speedy trial for an offender is 60 days after arraignment. Continuance requests by the defense, “good cause” found by the court, and other factors often delay this period beyond the 30/60 day period.

Treatment Court
Similar to Drug Court (see above), treatment court is an intensive program for juvenile offenders with a qualifying mental health diagnosis and substance abuse problem. Treatment court keeps the juvenile accountable to the court for an extended period of time while they attempt to overcome substance abuse and work through the mental health problems faced by the youth. If a juvenile offender successfully completes the program, the charge is dismissed.


Please feel free to contact the School Violence Program with questions or comments through the coordinating Deputy Prosecutor information listed below:

LEAH TAGUBA
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
School Violence Program Coordinator
1211 E. Alder Street
Seattle, Washington 98122
206-296-8859
FAX: 206-296-8869
Leah.Taguba@kingcounty.gov

Top of Page ^

* External Link

Dated: January 18, 2008


Contact Us:

Phone:  206-296-9000
FAX:  206-296-9013
TDD:  206-296-0100

DANIEL T. SATTERBERG
King County Prosecuting Attorney
W554 King County Courthouse
516 Third Avenue
Seattle, WA  98104

E-Mail:  Prosecuting Attorney

Usual Office Hours:
8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.
Monday - Friday


King County | News | Services | Comments | Search

Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County.
By visiting this and other King County web pages,
you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site.
The details.