![]() |
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Information and Privacy |
|
|
Telephone: (202) 514-3642 |
Washington, D.C. 20530 May 10, 1996 |
MEMORANDUM FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
THROUGH: | The Deputy Attorney General |
FROM: | Richard L. Huff Daniel J. Metcalfe Co-Directors Office of Information and Privacy |
SUBJECT: | Third-Party Requests for INS File Information |
INS's Past Practices.
(a) where disclosure would reflect agency performance, or
(b) where the request concerns whether a noncitizen/nonLPR was unlawfully employed by a high-level public official or a candidate for high office; (1) and
[the FOIA's] basic policy of "'full agency disclosure unless information is exempted under clearly delineated statutory language,'" indeed focuses on the citizens' right to be informed about what their government is up to. Official information that sheds light on an agency's performance of its statutory duties falls squarely within that statutory purpose. That purpose, however, is not fostered by disclosure of information about private citizens that is accumulated in various government files but reveals little or nothing about an agency's own conduct.
The Privacy Act's Requirements.
Approve Janet Reno
Date: June 21, 1996
Disapprove _______________
Other_____________
Attachment
____________________
1. Disclosures in such cases, while not required by the FOIA, are not prohibited by the Privacy Act, which covers only citizens and LPRs, and we would disclose the information in such cases as a matter of discretion. Unlike all of the other determinations, which would be made by INS, this discretionary disclosure action would be taken by OIP on administrative appeal, with a provision for prompt transmittal and consideration of time-sensitive appeals from the news media.
2. In the context of INS's A-Files, such an unusual case would be one in which there is an objectively reasonable concern that INS has improperly handled a matter -- including a case involving an allegation of improper preferential agency treatment of the employee of a high-level public official.
3. INS stresses that having its district office FOIA personnel make a new threshold determination of citizen/LPR/noncitizen status at the initial level would be problematic.
4. OLA advises that the Department's authorizing committees likely will support this proposed policy.
Go to: OIP's FOIA Page // DOJ FOIA Page // DOJ Home Page