[Federal Register: December 30, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 250)]
[Notices]               
[Page 73578-73579]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr30de99-133]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-414]

 
Certain Semiconductor Memory Devices and Products Containing 
Same; Notice of Decision To Extend the Deadline for Determining Whether 
to Review an Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337 
of the Tariff Act of 1930

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 73579]]

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to extend by fourteen (14) days, or until 
January 27, 2000, the deadline for determining whether to review an 
initial determination (ID) finding no violation of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended in the above-captioned investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clara Kuehn, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone (202) 205-3012. Hearing-impaired 
persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by 
contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. General 
information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing 
its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission ordered the institution of 
this investigation on September 18, 1998, based on a complaint filed on 
behalf of Micron Technology, Inc., 8000 South Federal Way, Boise, Idaho 
83707-0006 (``complainant''). The notice of investigation was published 
in the Federal Register on September 25, 1998. 63 Fed. Reg. 51372 
(1998).
    The presiding administrative law judge (ALJ) issued his final ID on 
November 29, 1999, concluding that there was no violation of section 
337. He found that: (a) Complainant failed to establish the requisite 
domestic industry showing for any of the three patents at issue; (b) 
all asserted claims of the patents are invalid; (c) none of the 
asserted claims of the patents are infringed; and (d) all of the 
patents are unenforceable for inequitable conduct.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42(h)(2) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (19 C.F.R. 210.42(h)(2)).
    Copies of the public version of the ALJ's ID and all other 
nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation 
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
20436, telephone 202-205-2000.

    Issued: December 21, 1999.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 99-33906 Filed 12-29-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P