[Federal Register: September 29, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 188)] [Notices] [Page 52538] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr29se99-102] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration By Notice dated February 23, 1999, and published in the Federal Register on March 5, 1999 (64 FR 10725), Sigma Aldrich Research Biochemicals, Inc., Attn: Richard Miliius, 1-3 Strathmore Road, Natick, Massachusetts 01760 made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) by letter to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of fentanyl (9801). A registered bulk manufacturer of fentanyl filed written comments and an objection in response to the notice of application. Review of the APA's definitions of license and licensing reveals that the granting or denial of a manufacturer's registration is a licensing action, not a rulemaking. Courts have frequently distinguished between agency licensing actions and rulemaking proceedings. See, e.g. Gateway Transp. Co. v. United States, 173 F. Supp. 822, 828 (D.C. Wis. 1959); Underwater Exotics, Ltd. v. Secretary of the Interior, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2262 (1994). Courts have interpreted agency action relating to licensing as not falling within the APA's rulemaking provisions. The objector argues that Sigma Aldrich Research Biochemicals, Inc. cannot prove its registration as a bulk manufacturer of fentanyl is in the public interest, that Sigma Aldrich Research Biochemicals, Inc.'s registration is not required to produce an adequate and uninterrupted supply of fentanyl, that there is sufficient competition with the present bulk manufacturers. The arguments of the objector were considered, however, DEA has reviewed the firm's safeguards to prevent that theft and diversion of fentanyl and found that the firm has met the regulatory requirements and public interest factors of the Controlled Substances Act. Sigma Aldrich Research Biochemicals, Inc. has been and is currently registered with DEA as a manufacturer of other Schedule II controlled substances. Sigma Aldrich Research Biochemicals, Inc.'s application is based on the firm's request to add fentanyl to its existing registration as a bulk manufacturer. The firm has been investigated by DEA on a regular basis to determine if the firm maintains effective controls against diversion and if its continued registration is consistent with the public interest. These investigations have included, in part, inspection and testing of the firm's physical security, audits of the firm's records, verification of compliance with state and local law and a review of the firm's background and history. These investigations have found Sigma Aldrich Research Biochemicals, Inc. to be in compliance with the Controlled Substances Act (C.S.A.) and its implementing regulations in recent years. Under Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Sec. 1301.43(b), DEA is not required to limit the number of manufacturers solely because a smaller number is capable of producing an adequate supply provided effective controls against diversion are maintained. DEA has determined that effective controls against diversion will be maintained by Sigma Aldrich Research Biochemicals, Inc. After reviewing all the evidence, DEA has determined, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), that it is consistent with the public interest to grant Sigma Aldrich Research Biochemicals, Inc.'s application to manufacture fentanyl at this time. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed above is granted. Dated: September 16, 1999. John H. King, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration. [FR Doc. 99-25358 Filed 9-28-99; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-M