[Federal Register: January 8, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 5)] [Notices] [Page 1198-1199] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr08ja99-66] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER-FRL-5498-6] Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments Availability of EPA comments prepared December 21, 1998 Through December 25, 1998 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at (202) 564-7167. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 10, 1998 (62 FR 17856). Draft EISs ERP No. D-DOE-E09802-00 Rating EC2, Commercial Light Water Reactor for the Production of Tritium at one or more Facilities: Watts Bar 1. Spring City, TN; Sequoyah 1 and 2 Soddy Daisy, TN; Bellefonte Units 1 and 2, Hollywood, AL, Approval of Permits and Licenses, TN and AL. Summary: EPA had environmental concerns about the project; and requested more information about the comparative costs of the Tritium production alternatives, processes, and potential environmental impacts. ERP No. D-SFW-K65115-CA Rating EO2, Headwaters Forest Acquisition and the Palco Sustained Yield Plan and Habitat Conservation Plan, Implementation, Humboldt, Del Norte and Mendocino Counties, CA. Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections and has identified key issues which need to be better addressed to fashion a more environmentally beneficial package. EPA key issues primarily focus on improvements EPA would like to see in the aquatics section of the HCP: cumulative watershed effects analysis process, Mass Wasting Strategy, wider riparian buffer zones consistent with recent State legislation, road storm-proofing program and wet weather road use, herbicide/forest chemical use, implementation, compliance, and monitoring. ERP No. D-USA-K11092-AZ Rating EC2, Yuma Proving Ground Multipurpose Installation, Diversification of Mission and Changes to Land Use, NPDES General Permit and COE Section 404 Permit, Yuma and La Pas Counties, AZ. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns due to the lack of detailed analyses pertaining to actions associated with implementing the preferred alternative. ERP No. D-USA-K26001-HI Rating LO, Schofield Barracks Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), Effluent Treatment and Disposal, NPDES Permit and COE Section 404 Permit, City of County of Honolulu, Oahu, HI. Summary: EPA expressed a lack of objection to the proposed project. ERP No. D-USN-K11094-00 Rating EC2, Developing Home Port Facilities For Three NIMITZ-Class Aircraft Carriers in Support of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, Construction and Operation, Coronado, CA; Bremerton and Everett, WA, Pearl Harbor, HI. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns at the three alternative sites in California and Washington State that were identified as part of the Proposed Action regarding dredging and dredged material disposal; impacts to marine water quality and aquatic biological resources; air quality; pollution prevention; and cumulative impacts. EPA noted that are dredging and dredged material disposal issues that need to be examined by EPA should the Navy decide to homeport a Nimitz-class carrier at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. ERP No. DS-NOA-K90020-CA Rating EC2, Coastal Pelagic Species Fishery Management Plan Amendment 8, (Formerly Known as Northern Anchovy Fishery Management Plan), Approval and Implementation, WA, CA and OR. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern with potential impacts to endangered marine mammals and birds, the minimal development of stock recovery plans (rebuilding program, pg B-81), and scarcity of firm data upon which to base management decisions. Additional information and clarification were requested regarding EPA above concerns. ERP No. DS-UMC-K24018-CA Rating EO2, Sewage Effluent Compliance Project, Updated and Additional Information, Implementation, Lower Santa Margarita Basin, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, San Diego County, CA. Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections to the proposed project based on potential adverse impacts to waters of the United States, and special aquatic sites. EPA requested additional data and assurances of mitigation, to avoid potential degradation of a riparian habitat mitigation area and a coastal salt marsh, from disposal of sewage effluent. Final EISs ERP No. F-DOE-J22005-CO Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Management of Certain Plutonium Residues and Srub Alloy Stored, Golden, CO. Summary: EPA had no comments on the final document. ERP No. F-FAA-E51045-FL Miami International Airport Master Plan Update for the Proposed New Runway, Funding and COE Section 404 Permit, Miami-Dade County, FL. [[Page 1199]] Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about a number of noise related issues raised in the DEIS were not adequately addressed in the FEIS. Concern was also expressed that, in spite of significant noise to residents near the airport, adequate mitigation is lacking. ERP No. F-NOA-L90027-AK Kachemak Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (KBNERR) Management Plan, Operations and Development, Southcentral, AK. Summary: Review of the final EIS was not deemed necessary. No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency. ERP No. F-USN-E11039-FL Cecil Field Naval Air Station Disposal and Reuse, Implementation, City of Jacksonville, Duval and Clay Counties, FL. Summary: EPA had a lack of objection to the proposed project. Dated: January 5, 1999. William D. Dickerson, Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities. [FR Doc. 99-430 Filed 1-7-99; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-U