[Federal Register: April 16, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 73)] [Notices] [Page 18901-18902] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr16ap99-70] [[Page 18901]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER-FRL-6241-8] Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments Availability of EPA comments prepared March 22, 1999 Through March 26, 1999 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at (202) 564-7167. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 10, 1998 (63 FR 17856). Draft EISs ERP No. D-AFS-J65288-CO Rating EC2, Uncompahgre National Forest Travel Plans Revision, Implementation, Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests, Garrison, Hinsdale Mesa, Montrose, Ouray and San Juan Counties, CO. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about potential adverse impacts to wetlands and water quality. EPA requested that the final EIS include additional measures and information regarding Forest Plan implementation. ERP No. D-AFS-J65295-MT Rating EC2, Clancy-Unionville Vegetation Manipulation and Travel Management Project, Implementation, Helene National Forest, Helena Ranger District, Lewis and Clark and Jefferson Counties, MT. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about adverse impacts to water and air quality and fisheries and wildlife habitat. ERP No. D-AFS-J65296-MT Rating EC2, Swamp Timber Sales Project, Implementation, Kootenai National Forest, Fortine Ranger District, Lincoln County, MT. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about potential short-term risks to Swamp and Edna Creeks, listed as threatened or impaired by the State of Montana and from proposed timber harvest and road construction. ERP No. D-BLM-K65213-NV Rating EC2, Sonoma-Gerlach and Paradise- Denio Management Framework Plans Amendment, Implementation of Management of the Black Rock Desert, Humboldt, Pershing and Washoe Counties, NV. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns with the proposed ``common pool'' system for permitting large-scale events. Cumulative impacts to the playa surface, and other sensitive resources should be addressed in the final EIS. ERP No. D-DOA-K36126-HI Rating EC2, Lower Hamakua Ditch Watershed Plan, To Provide a Stable and Affordable Supply of Agricultural Water to Farmer and Other, COE Section 404 Permit, Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention, Hawaii County, HI. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns with minimal in- stream base flows and the dewatering of sources. EPA suggests that evaluations of water rights; equitable water allocations as well as environmental consequences of the other, non-selected alternatives. ERP No. D-NPS-G61039-TX Rating LO, Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park, Package 227, General Management Plan, Implementation, Blanco and Gillespie Counties, TX. Summary: EPA expressed lack of objections. ERP No. D-NPS-G65068-LA Rating LO, New Orleans Jazz National Historical Park, General Management Plan, Implementation, City of New Orleans, Parish of Orleans, LA. Summary: EPA expressed lack of objections. ERP No. D-NPS-K65212-CA Rating LO, Mojave National Preserve General Management Plan, Implementation, San Bernardino County, CA. Summary: EPA expressed lack of objections. ERP No. DR-NPS-L61160-AK Rating LO, Legislative--Lower Sheejek River, Revised/Updated Information, Designation and Non-Designation for inclusion in the National Wild and Scencic River System, Tributary of the Porcupine River, Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge, AK. Summary: EPA expressed lack of objections. ERP No. DS-NPS-K61123-CA Rating LO, Backcounty and Wilderness Management Plan, Additional Information, General Management Plan Amendment, Joshua Tree National Park, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, CA. Summary: EPA expressed lack of objections. Final EISs ERP No. F-AFS-K65195-CA Desolation Wilderness Management Guidelines Revisions for the Eldorado National Forest and the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit (LTBMU), Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC), Eldorado County, CA. Summary: Review of the Final EIS was not deemed necessary. No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency. ERP No. F-AFS-L65202-AK Crystal Creek Timber Harvest, Implementation the 1997 Tongass Land Management Plan, Stikine Area, Tongass National Forest, AK. Summary: Review of the Final EIS was not deemed necessary. No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency. ERP No. F-BLM-K65204-AZ Hualapai Mountain Land Exchange/Plan Amendment, Implementation, Kingman and Dutch Flat, Mohave County, AZ. Summary: Review of the Final EIS has been completed and the project found to be satisfactory. ERP No. F-COE-K39051-CA Los Angeles County Drainage Area (LACDA) Water Conservation and Supply and Santa Fe--Whittier Narrows Dams Feasibility Study, Implementation, Los Angeles County, CA. Summary: Review of the Final EIS was not deemed necessary. No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency. ERP No. F-DOE-G06010-NM Los Alamos National Laboratory Continued Operation Site-Wide, Implementation, Los Alamos County, NM. Summary: Review of the FEIS was not deemed necessary. No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency. ERP No. F-NPS-J61099-UT Capitol Reef National Park, Implementation, General Management Plan, Development Concept Plan, Emery, Garfield, Sevier and Wayne Counties, UT. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns due to potential adverse impacts of non-point source pollution from herbicides used to control noxious weeds. ERP No. FS-AFS-K65193-NV Griffon Mining Project, Implementation, Updated Information, Revision for Expanding Gold Mining, Plan of Operations, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forests, Ely Ranger District, White Pine County, NV. Summary: EPA expressed continuing objections about potential adverse impacts to water quality and requested that modifications to the ROD or stipulations in Supplement Plan of Operations be implemented to ensure the proposed water quality mitigation measures, especially stream fencing contingency mitigation, occur prior to project initiation. ERP No. FS-COE-L36011-00 Columbia and Lower Willamette River [[Page 18902]] Federal Navigation Channel, Integrated Dredge Material Management Study, OR and WA. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns that the EIS lacks information regarding dredged disposal sites, EPA expressed environmental concerns that the EIS lacks information regarding dredged disposal sites, impacts of the new channel and sediment regimes, cumulative impacts, commitments to implement Ecosystem Restoration measures, and evaluation of relationship between proposed dredging activities and future decision on draw down on the Columbia and Snake Rivers. Dated: April 13, 1999. Ken Mittelholtz, Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of Federal Activities. [FR Doc. 99-9592 Filed 4-15-99; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P