[Federal Register: September 1, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 169)] [Notices] [Page 47765-47766] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr01se99-66] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-588-046] Continuation of Antidumping Finding: Polychloroprene Rubber From Japan AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of continuation of antidumping finding: polychloroprene rubber from Japan. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: On December 8, 1998, the Department of Commerce (``the Department''), pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), determined that revocation of the antidumping finding on polychloroprene rubber from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping (63 FR 67656 (December 8, 1998)). On July 30, 1999, the International Trade Commission (``the Commission''), pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, determined that revocation of the antidumping finding on polychloroprene rubber from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time (64 FR 41458 (July 30, 1999)). Therefore, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4), the Department is publishing notice of the continuation of the antidumping finding on polychloroprene rubber from Japan. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott E. Smith or Melissa G. Skinner, Office of Policy for Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6397 or (202) 482- 1560, respectively. EFFECTIVE DATE: August 6, 1999. Background On August 3, 1998, the Department initiated, and the Commission instituted, a sunset review (63 FR 41227 and 63 FR 41284, respectively) of the antidumping finding on polychloroprene rubber from Japan pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. As a result of its review, the Department found that revocation of the antidumping finding would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and notified the Commission of the magnitude of the margin likely to prevail were the finding to be revoked. (See Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review: Polychloroprene Rubber from Japan, 63 FR 67656 (December 8, 1998)). On July 30, 1999, the Commission determined, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, that revocation of the antidumping finding on polychloroprene rubber from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. (See Polychloroprene Rubber from Japan, 64 FR 41458 (July 30, 1999) and USITC Pub. 3212, Inv. No. AA1921-129 (Review) (July 1999)). Scope The merchandise covered by this antidumping finding is imports of polychloroprene rubber from Japan, an oil resistant synthetic rubber also known as polymerized chlorobutadiene or neoprene, currently classifiable under items 4002.42.00, 4002.49.00, 4003.00.00, 4462.15.21 and 4462.00.00. HTS item numbers are provided for convenience and for customs purposes. The written descriptions remain dispositive. Determination As a result of the determinations by the Department and the Commission that revocation of this antidumping finding would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of the antidumping finding on polychloroprene rubber from Japan. The Department will instruct the U.S. Customs Service to continue to collect antidumping duty deposits at the rate in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. Pursuant to section 751(c)(6)(A)(iii) of the Act, any subsequent five-year review of this finding will be initiated not later than the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation of this finding. [[Page 47766]] Normally, the effective date of continuation of a finding, order, or suspension agreement will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of the Notice of Continuation. As provided in 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4), the Department will issue its determination to continue a finding, order, or suspended investigation not later than seven days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of the Commission's determination concluding the sunset review and immediately thereafter will publish its notice of continuation in the Federal Register. In the instant case, however, the Department's publication of the Notice of Continuation was delayed. The Department has explicitly indicated that the effective date of continuation of this finding is August 6, 1999, seven days after the publication in the Federal Register of the Commission's determination. As a result, pursuant to sections 751(c)(2) and 751(c)(6)(A) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of this finding not later than July 2004. Dated: August 26, 1999. Bernard T. Carreau, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 99-22792 Filed 8-31-99; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P