[Federal Register: July 29, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 145)] [Notices] [Page 41107-41108] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr29jy99-57] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project Nos. 2364-000; 2365-000] Madison Paper Industries Maine; Madison Paper Industies' Request To use Alternative Procedures in Filing Hydroelectric License Applications July 23, 1999. By letter dated July 12, 1999, Madison Paper Industries (Madison), asked for Commission approved to use an alternative procedures in a filing application for the 9-megawatt (MW) Anson Project, No. 2365, and the 17-MW Abenaki Project, No. 2364.\1\ Madison has demonstrated that it made a reasonable effort to contact the resource agencies, Indian tribes, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and others who may be affected by their proposal, and has submitted a communication protocol governing how participants in the proposed process communicate with each other. Madison believes there is a consensus on using the alternative process, and it appears that the use of an alternative procedure may be appropriate in this case. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The projects are located on the Kennebec River in the towns of Anson and Madison, Somerset County, Maine. The Anson impoundment encompasses about 7 miles of the Kennebec River and 0.5 mile of the Carrabassett River. The Abenaki impoundment encompasses about 0.5 mile of the Kennebec River immediately below the Anson Project. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The purpose of this notice is to invited comments on Madison's request to use the alternative procedure, as required by section 4.34(i)(5) of the Commission's regulations. Additional notices seeking comments on specific project proposals, interventions and protests, and recommended terms and conditions will be issued at a later date. The alternative procedure combines the prefiling consultation process with the environmental review process and allows the applicant to file an Applicant-Prepared Environmental Assessment (APEA) in lieu of Exhibit E of the license applications. This differs from the traditional process, in which the applicant consults with agencies, Indian tribes, and NGOs during preparation of the application for the license and before filing it, but the Commission staff performs the environmental review after the application is filed. The alternative procedure is intended to simplify and expedite the licensing process by combining the prefiling consultation and environmental review processes into a single process, to facilitate greater participation, and to improve communication and cooperation among the participants. The alternative procedure can be tailored to the project under consideration. Alternative Process and the Anson and Abenaki Projects Madison intends on preparing an APEA for the projects to: consolidate and streamline the licensing process; provide for the early identification of environmental impacts; take into account cumulative project impacts and evaluate alternatives for addressing those impacts; and promote early, comprehensive settlement discussions. On February 12, 1999, Madison distributed an Initial Stage Consultation Document for the projects to state and federal resource agencies, Indian tribes, and NGOs. Madison scheduled a meeting for all interested parties on Feburary 24 and 25, 1999, respectively. During spring 1999, Madison developed and consulted on survey plans for ambient water quality, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fisheries. These surveys are being conducted during summer and early fall, 1999. Public [[Page 41108]] scoping meetings and a site visit are planned for Fall 1999, when additional study requests will be requested. The applications, including the applicant-prepared EA, would be filed with the Commission before May 1, 2002, the expiration date of Madison's current licenses. Each application would include a common multi-project APEA, adapted, as necessary, to the individual application. Comments Interested parties have 30 days from the date of this notice to file with the Commission, any comments on Madison's proposal to use the altenative procedures to file applications for the Anson and Abenaki Projects. Filing Requirements The comments must be filed by providing an original and 8 copies as required by the Commission's regulations to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of the Secretary, Dockets--Room 1A, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426. All comments filings must bear the heading ``Comments on the Alternative Procedure,'' and include the names and numbers of the projects: Abenaki Hydro Project, No. 2364 Anson Hydro Project, No. 2365 For further information, please contact Nan Allen of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at 202-219-2938, or E-mail at Nan.Allen@ferc.fed.us. Lindwood A. Watson, Jr., Acting Secretary. [FR Doc. 99-19389 Filed 7-28-99; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-M