[Federal Register: September 2, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 170)]
[Proposed Rules]               
[Page 46732]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02se98-36]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION

39 CFR 3001

[Docket No. RM98-3; Order No. 1218]

 
Revisions to Rules of Practice

AGENCY: Postal Rate Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission seeks suggestions, especially from those who 
have taken part in recent rate, classification, and complaint dockets, 
on ways to improve the efficiency of proceedings conducted pursuant to 
39 U.S.C. sec. 3624. Commenters are encouraged to address topics 
covered in 39 CFR 3001.1-92, with the exception of library references 
and confidential information. These two matters will be addressed in 
separate rulemakings. Commenters' suggestions will be considered in 
developing amendments that will improve the efficiency of Commission 
proceedings.

DATES: Comments should be filed on or before October 28, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 
202-789-6820.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Following each major proceeding, the 
Commission reviews the effectiveness of its rules of practice and 
invites participants to offer suggestions for changes or improvements. 
The Commission's initial assessment of the operation of its rules in 
the recently-completed omnibus rate and classification case (Docket No. 
R97-1) leads to several preliminary conclusions. First, it appears that 
two recently-adopted revisions--addressing the use of surveys and the 
Service's filing of ``pro forma'' financial data and information--
worked reasonably well. Second, it appears that consideration should be 
given to incorporating all (or most) of the special rules of practice 
into the general, or standing, rules. Third, an assessment of ways to 
reduce the costs inherent in service of documents, including 
consideration of the extent to which electronic filing requirements (or 
options) can be added should be undertaken.
    A serious evidentiary dispute over library references indicates 
that clarification of this longstanding practice is essential. However, 
the Commission intends to address this matter, and the potential need 
for changes in its rules on confidential information, in separate 
rulemakings. Thus, commenters are requested not to include suggestions 
on these topics in response to this rulemaking.

    Dated: August 27, 1998.
Margaret P. Crenshaw,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-23636 Filed 9-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P