[Federal Register: May 20, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 97)] [Notices] [Page 27784-27785] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr20my98-107] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [Docket No. NHTSA-98-3782; Notice 1] Laforza Automobiles, Inc.; Receipt of Application for Temporary Exemption From Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208 Laforza Automobiles, Inc., of Escondido, California, (``Laforza'') has applied for a temporary exemption from the automatic restraint requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection, as described below. The basis of the application is that compliance would cause substantial economic hardship to a manufacturer that has tried in good faith to comply with the standard. This notice of receipt of an application is published in accordance with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 30113(b)(2) and does not represent any judgment of the agency on the merits of the application. Laforza is a Nevada corporation established in August 1997. To date it has produced no motor vehicles. It intends to purchase chassis from Magnum Industriales s.r.l., an Italian company, ``where it will undergo the necessary modifications for the US market.'' A Ford engine, transmission, and associated emission control systems will be installed, and the end result will be a multipurpose passenger vehicle (sport utility) called the Prima 4X4. Laforza estimates a total production of 400 units between the date of the exemption and December 31, 2000. This is the date that its requested temporary exemption would expire. Laforza seeks an exemption from S4.2.6.1.1 and S4.2.6.2 of Standard No. 208. Paragraph S4.2.6.1.1, in pertinent part, would require Laforza to provide a driver side airbag on not less than 80 percent of all Primas manufactured before September 1, 1998. Paragraph S4.2.6.2 would require all Primas manufactured on and after September 1, 1998, to be equipped with both driver and right front passenger airbags. Although the passenger side airbag is not required until September 1 of this year, ``the airbag development program has to include both the passenger and driver side airbags since the development duration for a driver's side airbag would overlap the time when a passenger's side airbag will be required.'' Laforza continues, ``If the development is not combined, many of these tests would have to be repeated with a significant increase in test and material costs.'' In the first 6 months after its agreement with Magnum, Laforza spent ``an estimated total of 200 manhours and $15,000'' on airbag compliance issues. Lacking the resources to independently develop an airbag system, it ``has contacted airbag development companies in the US to assist with the project.'' Laforza has concluded that it will take 2 years to develop and certify the system. If immediate compliance were required, the cost would be $4,000,000. An exemption would permit Laforza to generate revenues ``to meet the costs mandated by the airbag development program'' and spread these costs over a period of time. Because the company is less than a year old, it could not submit corporate balance sheets and income statements for the three years immediately preceding the filing of its application, as specified by NHTSA's regulation. Its stockholder equity is $900,000. Laforza argues that ``production of the Laforza Prima 4X4 is in the best interest of the public and the US economy,'' pointing to the uniqueness of the vehicle, and the American components that it incorporates, the powertrain from Ford Motor Company and the purchase of ``other parts * * * from approximately five different US companies.'' The company currently employs 15 people full-time and three people part time, which will grow as production increases. Further, ``in addition, * * * at least 50 employees from other companies are involved in the Laforza project.'' During the exemption period, the Prima will be ``equipped with a conventional retractor type, three-point driver and passenger seatbelt system that meets all requirements of FMVSS No. 208,'' and the vehicle otherwise complies with all Federal motor vehicle safety standards that apply to it. Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the application described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and the notice number, and be submitted to: Central Docket Management Facility, room Pl-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590. It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted. All comments received before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated below will be considered, and will be available for examination in the docket (from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.) at the above address both before and after that date. Comments may also be viewed on the internet at web site dms.dot.gov. To the extent possible, comments filed after the [[Page 27785]] closing date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the application will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority indicated below. Comment closing date: June 9, 1998. (49 U.S.C. 30113; delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50. and 501.8) Issued: May 15, 1998. L. Robert Shelton, Associate Administrator for Safety Performance Standards. [FR Doc. 98-13437 Filed 5-19-98; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P