[Federal Register: May 1, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 84)] [Notices] [Page 24209] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr01my98-138] [[Page 24209]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Customs Service Harbor Maintenance Fee No Longer To Be Collected on Cargo Loaded for Export AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury. ACTION: General notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This document announces that as of April 25, 1998, Customs will no longer be collecting the Harbor Maintenance Fee for cargo loaded on board a vessel for export at a port subject to the Harbor Maintenance Fee. Further, this document announces that protest procedures are inapplicable to refund claims for export-related Harbor Maintenance Fees. EFFECTIVE DATE: April 25, 1998. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Barbare, Operations Management Specialist, Budget Division, (202) 927-0034. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Harbor maintenance Fee was created by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 4461 et seq.) (the Act) and is implemented by Sec. 24.24 of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 24.24). The fee, pursuant to the Act and as implemented by the regulations was to be assessed on port use associated with imports, exports, and movements of cargo and passengers between identified ports and paid to the U.S. Customs Service. On March 31, 1998, the Supreme Curt in United States, Petitioner v. United States Shoe Corporation ______US______, No. 97-372 declared that the Harbor Maintenance Fee is unconstitutional as applied to exports. Consequently, as of April 25, 1998, the United States Customs Service will no longer be collecting the Harbor Maintenance Fee for port use associated with exports. The Supreme Court also affirmed the decision of the lower courts that protest procedures are inapplicable to refund claims for export- related Harbor Maintenance Fees. The public is hereby advised that the Customs Service will not decide or respond to any protest alleging that the export-related Harbor Maintenance Fees are prohibited by the Export Clause of the United States Constitution. Any person who previously received correspondence from Customs concerning any such protests should disregard such correspondence and will not receive further communications regarding such protests. Pursuant to a court order issued by the United States Court of International Trade in the case United States Shoe Corp. v. The United States (Court No. 94-11-0068), dated April 6, 1998, the government will design a claim form for refund claims and the claim form process will apply to all claims filed within the 2-year statute of limitations applicable to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1581(i) cases. Dated: April 28, 1998. Samuel H. Banks, Acting Commissioner of Customs. [FR Doc. 98-11644 Filed 4-30-98; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4820-02-P