[Federal Register: May 14, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 93)]
[Notices]               
[Page 34436-34437]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr14my02-31]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

[CPSC Docket No. 02-2]

 
In the Matter of DAISY MANUFACTURING COMPANY Inc.; 
d/b/a/ Daisy Outdoor Products, 400 West Stribling Drive, Rogers, 
Arkansas 72756; Prehearing Conference

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Notice of first prehearing conference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: This notice announces a prehearing conference to be held in the 
matter of Daisy Manufacturing Company, Inc. on June 7, 2002 at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The prehearing conference will be in hearing room 420 of the 
East-West Towers Building, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 
20814.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, U.S. 
Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC; telephone (301) 
504-0800; telefax (301) 504-0127.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This public notice is issued pursuant to 16 
CFR 1025.21(b) of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission's Rules 
of Practice for Adjudicative Proceedings to inform the public that a 
prehearing conference will be held in administrative proceeding under 
section 15 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (``CPSA''), 15 U.S.C. 
2064 and section 15 of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (``FHSA''), 
15 U.S.C. 1274, captioned CPSC Docket No. 02-2, In the Matter of DAISY 
MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Inc. doing business as Daisy Outdoor Products. 
The Presiding Officer in the proceeding is United States Administrative 
Law Judge William B. Moran. The Presiding Officer has determined that, 
for good and sufficient cause, the time period for holding the first 
prehearing conference had to be extended to the date announced above, 
which date is beyond the fifty (50) day period referenced in 16 CFR 
1025.21(a).
    The public is referred to the Code of Regulations citation listed 
above for identification of the issues to be raised at the conference 
and is advised that the date, time and place of the hearing also will 
be established at the conference.
    Substantively, the issues being litigated in this proceeding are 
described by the Presiding Officer to include: Whether certain 
identified models of the Daisy Powerline Airgun, designed to shoot BBs 
or pellets, contain defects which create a substantial product hazard 
defect in that, allegedly, BBs can become lodged within a ``virtual 
magazine,'' or fail to feet into the firing chamber, with the 
consequences that one may fire or shake the gun without receiving any 
visual or audible indication that is still loaded. Consequently, the 
complaint asserts that these alleged problems can lead consumers to 
erroneously believe that the gun is empty and that such phenomena means 
that the gun is ``defective'' within the meaning of section 15 of the 
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064 and section 15 of the FHSA, 15 U.S.C. 1274. The 
Complaint further alleges that the gun's design, by making it difficult 
to determine when looking into the loading port whether a BB is 
present, constitutes a ``defect'' under the CPSA and the FHSA and 
presents a ``substantial product hazard,'' creating a substantial risk 
of injury to consumers, within the meaning of section 15(a)(2), of the 
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(a)(12), and presents a substantial risk of injury 
of children under section 15(c)(1) and (c)(2) of the FHSA, 15 U.S.C. 
1274(c)(1) and (c)(2). The public should be mindful that these are 
allegations only and the CPSC bears the burden of proof in establishing 
any violations. Should these allegations be proven, Complaint Counsel 
for the Office of Compliance of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety 
Commission seeks a finding that these products present a substantial 
product hazard and present a substantial risk of injury to children and 
that public notification of such hazard and risk of injury be made 
pursuant to section 15(c) of the CPSA and that other appropriate relief 
be directed, as set forth in the Complaint.


[[Page 34437]]


    Dated: May 9, 2002.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 02-12044 Filed 5-13-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M