[Federal Register: April 25, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 80)]
[Notices]
[Page 20795]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr25ap01-40]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP01-154-000]
Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.; Notice of Application
April 19, 2001.
On April 13, 2001, Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.
(Maritimes), 1284 Soldiers Field Road, Boston, Massachusetts 02135,
filed in Docket No. CP01-154-000, an abbreviated application pursuant
to section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and the Commission's Rules
and Regulations for a certificate of public convenience and necessity
authorizing Maritimes: (i) To place in service, on a full-time basis, a
compressor unit which is currently installed for use on a stand-by
basis at Maritimes' existing compressor station site in Richmond,
Maine; (ii) to connect, place in service and operate a second
compressor unit currently on site and stored within an existing
compressor station building in Baileyville, Maine; and (iii) to
construct, install, and operate any auxiliary facilities at these
compressor stations necessary to place these compressor units in
service. The application is on file with the Commission and open to
public inspection. The filing may be viewed at http://www.ferc.fed.us/
online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
Maritimes, along with its Canadian pipeline affiliate, operates a
high pressure natural gas delivery system that transports natural gas
in international commerce from a point near Goldboro, Nova Scotia to
the Canadian-United States border and through the northeastern states
of Maine and New Hampshire, with a terminus in Dracut, Massachusetts.
Maritimes states that the proposed facilities will provide additional
system flexibility and reliability and eliminate system bottlenecks for
Maritimes' existing shippers. It also will enable Maritimes to
accommodate additional flows of gas from the existing production fields
located offshore Nova Scotia. The proposed compressor units have a
nominal rating of 8,311 (HP) (NEMA) each. The new compressor units will
increase the design capacity of 360,575 Dekatherms per day (Dth/d) to
440,000 Dth/d. Maritimes states that there are no additional land
requirements associated with the proposed project. All project
components are located on lands, and within compressor station
buildings, currently owned and used by Maritimes.
The estimated cost of Maritimes' proposed project is approximately
$11.7 million. Maritimes states that there is no subsidy issue with
respect to this application because: (i) The cost of the unit at
Richmond is already reflected in rate base, (ii) Maritimes' rates are
currently capped and will continue to be capped until at least November
30, 2004, at $0.715 per dth on a 100 percent load factor basis, and
(iii) the rate on a rolled-in basis, giving consideration to the costs
associated with the proposed facilities, will not increase above
current levels.
Questions regarding the details of this proposed project should be
directed to Joseph F. McHugh, Director, Rates and Regulatory Affairs,
M&N Management Company, 1284 Soldiers Field Road, Boston, Massachusetts
02135.
There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before May 10, 2001, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to
intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary
of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the
applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of
filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant
and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the
proceeding.
However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to their comments to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental
commenters will be placed on the Commission's environmental mailing
list, will receive copies of the environmental documents, and will be
notified of meetings associated with the Commission's environmental
review process. Environmental commenters will not be required to serve
copies of filed documents on all other parties. However, the non-party
commenters will not receive copies of all documents filed by other
parties or issued by the Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the Commission) and will not have the
right to seek court review of the Commission's final order.
The Commission may issue a preliminary determination on non-
environmental issues prior to the completion of its review of the
environmental aspects of the project. This preliminary determination
typically considers such issues as the need for the project and its
economic effect on existing customers of the applicant, on other
pipelines in the area, and on landowners and communities. For example,
the Commission considers the extent to which the applicant may need to
exercise eminent domain to obtain rights-of-way for the proposed
project and balances that against the non-environmental benefits to be
provided by the project. Therefore, if a person has comments on
community and landowner impacts from this proposal, it is important
either to file comments or to intervene as early in the process as
possible.
Comments, protests, and intervention may be filed electronically
via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.
fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.
If the Commission decides to set the application for a formal
hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, the Commission will issue
another notice describing that process. At the end of the Commission's
review process, a final Commission order approving or denying a
certificate will be issued.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10191 Filed 4-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M