From: ROB SEGAL [vze3hc2e@verizon.net] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:54 AM To: rule-comments@sec.gov Subject: File No.: S7-36-02 File No.: S7-36-02 Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Proxy Voting Records by Registered Management Investment Companies I write as an investor to express my strong support for this new rule. 1. Proxy Voting Policies should be posted on the Investment Companies Website. 2. Voting records should be posted on each investment company's website. This should be done at the same time that the vote is cast. There is no reason to wait for quarterly or less frequent disclosure. The voting record should remain available on the website for at least 5 years after each vote. Investment companies should be encouraged (but not required) to explain why they cast each vote as they did. I don't feel that additional forms to file with the SEC are required for either Voting Policies or Voting Records. Companies should be encouraged (but not required) to make this information available in printed form to their investors on an annual basis. Note: I am much more concerned with disclosure of voting records than I am with voting policies. Policies are subject to interpretation. Votes are not. I understand that some investment companies argue that by disclosing their voting records, they may alienate the managers of companies whose proposals they vote against, and thus make access to information from these managers more difficult to obtain. I don't find this argument at all compelling. I am far more concerned with the real conflict of interests that can arise when investment companies don't disclose their voting records. Basically, I want to know that my investment company is taking a good hard look at management proposals and voting in a way that best serves shareholder interests. Full disclosure will go a long way to providing this. Sincerely, Robert M. Segal No professional association. I am an independent investor from the Bronx, NY. email: stravon@prodigy.net